| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Wanda L. Waller | Analyst |
| Mr. John N. Slone | Chairperson | |
| Ms. Sherri V. Ward | Member | |
| Mr. Melvin H. Meyer | Member |
2. The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Army Commendation Medal with “V” Device.
3. The applicant states that he received the medal but it is not shown on his DD Form 214. In support of his application, he submits a copy of his DD Form 214 and a photograph of a Army Commendation Medal with “V” Device.
4. The applicant’s military records show that he was inducted on 21 January 1966. He served as a pioneer, a combat construction specialist and heavy truck driver in Vietnam from 19 November 1966 through 3 November 1967. On
7 November 1967, the applicant was honorably released from active duty.
5. The applicant’s DD Form 214, which was authenticated in his own hand, does not show the Army Commendation Medal with “V” Device as an authorized award.
6. In support of his claim for award of the Army Commendation Medal with “V” Device, the applicant provided a photograph of an Army Commendation Medal with “V” Device. However, there are no orders for the Army Commendation Medal with “V” Device in the available records.
7. Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) on the applicant’s DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show entitlement to the Army Commendation Medal with “V” Device.
8. There is no evidence the applicant received the first award of the Good Conduct Medal. There also is no evidence the applicant was disqualified by his chain of command from receiving the Good Conduct Medal. His records do not contain any adverse information and he received conduct and efficiency ratings of “excellent” throughout his service.
9. The applicant’s DD Form 214 shows the Vietnam Service Medal as an authorized award. His records show that he participated in two campaigns during his assignment in Vietnam.
10. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) lists the unit awards received by units serving in Vietnam. This document shows the unit, to which the applicant was assigned, was cited for award of the Meritorious Unit Commendation for actions during the period 1 May 1967 to 31 July 1968 by Department of the Army General Orders Number 17, dated 1969. This award is not shown on his discharge document.
11. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) shows the applicant is entitled to award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation based on Department of the Army General Orders Number 43, dated 1970. This award is not shown on his discharge document.
12. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) also shows the applicant is entitled to award of the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation based on Department of the Army General Orders Number 43, dated 1970. This award is not shown on his discharge document.
13. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Army Commendation Medal may be awarded to any member of the Armed Forces of the United States who, while serving in any capacity with the Army after
6 December 1941, distinguished himself or herself by heroism, meritorious achievement or meritorious service. As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required. The bronze “V” device indicates acts of heroism involving conflict with an armed enemy.
14. Paragraph 1-25 of Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides that awards made by the President, Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of the Army will be announced in Department of the Army General Orders.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The Board considered the photograph of the Army Commendation Medal with “V” Device provided by the applicant. However, this photograph by itself is not sufficient as a basis for award of the Army Commendation Medal with “V” Device, particularly in view of evidence of record which shows the applicant was not awarded the Army Commendation Medal with “V” Device.
2. There are no orders for award of the Army Commendation Medal with “V” Device.
3. The applicant also signed his discharge document on 7 November 1967 attesting to the fact that he was not entitled to award of the Army Commendation Medal with “V” Device. Therefore, the Board determined that there is insufficient evidence on which to base award of the Army Commendation Medal with “V” Device in this case.
4. The applicant is entitled to the first award of the Good Conduct Medal for the period 21 January 1966 through 7 November 1967 based on completion of a period of qualifying service ending with the termination of a period of Federal military service. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show this award.
5. The applicant’s DD Form 214 shows the Vietnam Service Medal as an authorized award. However, evidence of record shows the applicant participated in two campaigns during his assignment in Vietnam which are not correctly shown by award of two bronze service stars for wear on his Vietnam Service Medal. Therefore, in accordance with the governing regulation, the applicant is entitled to the Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze service stars and correction of his DD Form 214 to show these awards.
6. The applicant’s unit received the Meritorious Unit Commendation, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation while he was assigned to it. Therefore, the applicant is entitled correction of his DD Form 214 to show these unit awards.
7. In view of the foregoing findings and conclusions, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s records, but only as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned was awarded the first award of the Good Conduct Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze service stars, the Meritorious Unit Commendation, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation.
2. That so much of the application as is in excess of the foregoing be denied.
BOARD VOTE:
JNS____ SVW___ MHM_____ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
__John N. Slone_________
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2002075889 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20021119 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 107.0020 |
| 2. | 107.0000 |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019026
His DD Form 214 shows award of the Distinguished Flying Cross, the Army Aviator Badge, the Air Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation. The evidence of record shows he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual be corrected by: a. deleting from his DD Form 214, dated 9 April 1972, the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006626
Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the DD Form 214 he was issued shows the National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Campaign Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, Parachutist Badge, and the Combat Infantryman Badge. Therefore, he is entitled to award of four bronze service stars for wear on his already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal and correction of his DD Form 214 accordingly. With respect to the Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device, his...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010861
Furthermore, Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his military service. The evidence of record shows he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that the DD Form 214 of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and fidelity during the period 9 August 1967...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002081323C070215
The applicant’s DD Form 214 and military personnel records show award of the Vietnam Service Medal, but do not show campaign credit for the periods the applicant served in Vietnam. This medal was awarded by the Government of Vietnam to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam during the period 1 March 1961 through 28 March 1973. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080004982
Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. Special Orders show that the applicant was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge which is not shown on his records; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show this award. The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022067
Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. Deleting the Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze service stars; and c. Adding to his DD Form 214 the: * Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device * Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) * Vietnam Service Medal with three bronze service stars * Valorous Unit Award * Meritorious Unit Commendation *...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088958C070403
Since his friend had been seriously wounded, and he had only sustained light wounds, he never thought about it; however, since finding the photograph, he feels that he is entitled to award of the Purple Heart. The applicant's DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) does not show award of the Purple Heart. That form does not reflect award of the Army Commendation Medal with "V" device or award of the Air Medal.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074839C070403
His discharge document shows entitlement to the Army Commendation Medal, but does not show the Army Commendation Medal with "V" Device. There are no orders in the applicant’s service personnel records which show that he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device, and there is no evidence that he was recommended for award of the Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device. Orders show the applicant was awarded the Army Commendation Medal for meritorious service in Vietnam.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014893
Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) on his DD Form 214 reflects the National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, Vietnam Campaign Medal, only one Army Commendation Medal, and one Bronze Star Medal. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provides that the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. As a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082863C070215
16 October 1969 in Vietnam. However, evidence of record shows the applicant participated in six campaigns during his assignments in Vietnam which are not correctly shown by award of one silver service star and one bronze service star for wear on his Vietnam Service Medal. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned was awarded the Bronze Star Medal with Second Oak Leaf Cluster with "V" Device, the Air Medal, the...