Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | ||
Mr. Joseph A. Adriance | Analyst |
Mr. Raymond V. O’Connor, Jr. | Chairperson | ||
Ms. Margaret K. Patterson | Member | ||
Mr. Arthur A. Omartian | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, reinstatement into the Army or full separation pay.
APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that he was told by his defense counsel and a military judge that he would be able to extend his expiration of term of service (ETS) in order to retire as a staff sergeant/E-6 (SSG/E-6). He further claims that according to his supervisors at the time, and under the provisions of the governing regulations, he should have received full separation pay. He states that he was convicted by a special court-martial (SPCM) on 12 October 2001. The presiding Military Judge stated at that time that the applicant would be retained on active duty, that he would be able to extend his ETS date, and that he would be able to retire as a SSG/E-6. However, his unit went against the wishes of the Military Judge and decided to administratively separate him, but instead elected to give him a rehabilitative reassignment to a new unit. He claims that he proved himself and did his job at the new unit, but when the time came for him to request reenlistment or extension, the brigade commander disapproved his request. He claims that the brigade commander was involved in an incident with a female captain around that time, and was facing sexual harassment charges. As a result, the brigade commander was unable to render a clear and level headed decision in regard to his request for reenlistment. He asks that these factors be considered when his case is reviewed. He requests that if his reinstatement is not approved, that consideration be given to providing him full separation pay. He claims this is justified based on his case being extraordinary, and because denial would be unjust given his overall record of service.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
On 25 May 2002, he was honorably discharged from the Regular Army after completing 17 years, 6 months, and 3 days of active military service. The separation document (DD Form 214) issued to him on the date of his separation confirms that he was discharged under the provisions of chapter 4, Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of ETS.
The DD Form 214 also verifies that the applicant held the rank of SSG/E-6 at the time of his discharge, and that he was assigned a Separation Program Designator (SPD) of JBK and a reentry (RE) code of RE-3.
On 12 October 2001, the applicant was convicted of the wrongful use of cocaine by a SPCM. The resultant sentence included a reprimand and a reduction to SSG/E-6. A memorandum from the Military Judge who presided in the case, dated 14 November 2001, indicates that before determining the applicant’s sentence, the Judge reviewed more than 50 evaluation reports, certificates, awards, and commendations, which he found to be compelling evidence of the applicant’s outstanding prior service.
The Military Judge also stated that based on the nature of the offense, the witnesses who testified on his behalf, and the documentary evidence admitted by the defense, he determined that a reduction below the rank of SSG/E-6 or a punitive discharge were not warranted. He presumed that the applicant’s ETS date would subsequently be extended to allow him to retire after 20 years of service as a SSG/E-6.
The SPCM findings were promulgated in SPCM Order Number 2, issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army Air Defense Artillery Center and Fort Bliss, Fort Bliss, Texas, dated 20 February 2002. In this order, the SPCM convening authority approved the sentence and reprimanded the applicant for his conduct.
On 20 May 2002, Orders Number 140-0023, issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army Air Defense Artillery Center and Fort Bliss, Fort Bliss, Texas, reassigned the applicant to the transition point for transition processing and for discharge on
25 May 2002. These orders contained additional instructions that indicated that the applicant was entitled to one half separation pay in accordance with Title 10, United States Code, Section 1174 (10 USC 1174).
Army Regulation 635-5-1 (SPD Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. It states, in pertinent part, that the SPD code of JBK is the appropriate code to assign to Regular Army (RA) soldiers separating under the provisions of chapter 4, Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of ETS, who are ineligible for, barred from, or otherwise denied reenlistment, who are separated at the completion of their enlistment. In addition, the SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table establishes the RE code of RE-3 as the proper reentry code to assign to soldiers separated under this authority and for this reason. RE-3 is the code assigned to soldiers who are disqualified from reenlistment, but whose disqualification is waivable.
10 USC 1174 contains the legal authority for the payment of separation pay. It states that a regular enlisted member of an armed force who is discharged involuntarily or as the result of the denial of the reenlistment of the member and who has completed six or more, but less than 20, years of active service immediately before that discharge is entitled to separation pay computed under subsection (d) unless the Secretary concerned determines that the conditions under which the member is discharged do not warrant payment of such pay. The Secretary of the Army’s policy in regard to the payment of separation pay stipulates that soldiers assigned a SPD code of JBK are authorized to receive one half separation pay.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The Board notes the applicant’s contention that he was unjustly denied reenlistment based on the clouded judgment of his brigade commander who went against the wishes of a military judge when he denied the applicant’s request for reenlistment. However, it finds insufficient evidence to support this allegation.
2. The available evidence does not contain the actual denial of the applicant’s reenlistment or extension of his enlistment or any documentation that contained the reasons or basis for these denials. However, it does contain a properly constituted DD Form 214 which was authenticated by the applicant. This document identifies the reason and characterization of the discharge and the Board presumed government regularity in the discharge process.
3. The evidence of record further shows that the applicant was discharged in accordance with applicable regulations, which includes the assignment of the JBK SPD code and the RE-3 code. The record also shows that the applicant was authorized to receive one half separation pay under the provisions of the existing law and regulation.
4. The Board is satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process. Therefore, it finds insufficient evidence to support the requested relief.
5. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
6. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__RVO__ __MKP _ __AAO __ DENY APPLICATION
CASE ID | AR2002075783 | |
SUFFIX | ||
RECON | ||
DATE BOARDED | 2002/10/01 | |
TYPE OF DISCHARGE | HD | |
DATE OF DISCHARGE | 2002/05/25 | |
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR 635-200 C4 | |
DISCHARGE REASON | ETS | |
BOARD DECISION | DENY | |
REVIEW AUTHORITY | ||
ISSUES 1. 192 | 110.0300 | |
2. | ||
3. | ||
4. | ||
5. | ||
6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069426C070402
APPLICANT STATES : In effect, that based on his assigned SPD code he was only granted one-half separation pay based on 16 years of active duty service. However, the evidence of record clearly establishes, as evidenced by his separation order and other separation documents, that he was separated by reason of ETS, under the provisions of chapter 4, Army Regulation 635-200, which should have been the separation authority entered in his separation document. Lacking independent evidence that...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080003764
Director Analyst The following members, a quorum, were present: Chairperson Member Member The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The regulation shows that the SPD code JBK as shown on the applicants DD Form 214 specifies the narrative reason for separation as involuntary discharge for Completion of Required Active Service and that the authority for separation under this separation program designator is AR 635-200,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002081790C070215
At the time of his discharge, his report of separation (DD Form 214) indicated that he would receive separation pay in the amount of $15,563.10; however, he never received the separation pay and has since been informed that his separation code of "JCP" is incorrect and thus prevents him from receiving separation pay. It provides, in pertinent part, that one-half separation pay is authorized for soldiers who are not fully qualified for retention, are denied reenlistment and separate on the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021749
His DD Form 214 for the period ending 20 May 2013 shows he was honorably discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 4. Effective 20 June 1991, half payment of non-disability separation pay is authorized to service members of the RA and RC, in pertinent part, who involuntarily have separated from active duty and have met each of the following four conditions: * the member is on active duty and has completed at least 6...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084302C070212
The SPD Code of "JBK" is used when the authority for involuntary discharge is Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 4, due to "Completion of Required Active Service" for Regular Army soldiers ineligible for, barred from, or otherwise denied reenlistment, who are separated upon completion of enlistment. It provides, in pertinent part, that full separation pay is authorized for soldiers who are fully qualified for retention but are denied reenlistment under established RCP provisions and are...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016724
The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was authorized separation pay upon his discharge in May 1983. On 4 October 1981, the commander of the Soldier who accidently fired his weapon submitted a report of disciplinary or administrative action and indicated that the aggravated assault was unfounded and that a written reprimand/admonition was rendered to that Soldier for dereliction of duty. With respect to the applicant's contention that the Board should conduct an...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040011586C070208
Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. By regulation, members separated upon the completion of their enlistment who are ineligible for, barred from, or otherwise denied reenlistment will be assigned a SPD code of JBK, and a corresponding RE code of RE-3. The evidence of record in this case confirms the applicant was ineligible for reenlistment...
ARMY | DRB | CY2005 | 20050010639
Larry W. Racster | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The DD Form 214 she was issued at the time confirms she was assigned the SPD code of JBK and a RE-3 code based on the authority and reason for her separation. This list confirms that separation pay is not authorized for members separated with an SPD code of KBK.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060143C070421
Finally, she requests that the decision to grant her half separation pay be reconsidered and she be provided full separation pay in accordance with Title 10 of the United States Code, section 1174 (10 USC 1174) and the Department of Defense (DOD) Financial Management Regulation. It states, in pertinent part, that a member who is discharged involuntarily or as the result of the denial of the reenlistment and who has completed six or more, but less than 20, years of active service immediately...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050013723C070206
On 26 November 1999, the applicant was honorably discharged, in the rank/pay grade, Sergeant/E-5, under the provision of Army Regulation (AR) 635-200, Chapter 4, at the completion of required active service. On his discharge from the Regular Army, the applicant's DD Form 214 was annotated to show he was honorably discharged; his separation was in accordance with AR 635-200, Chapter 4; the separation code applied to his DD Form 214 was "JBK"; RE Code "3" was entered in its appropriate space...