| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. William Blakely | Analyst |
| Mr. Raymond V. O’Connor, Jr. | Chairperson | ||
| Ms. Margaret K. Patterson | Member | ||
| Mr. Arthur A. Omartian | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that he be promoted and advanced on the Retired List to the rank and pay grade of sergeant first class/E-7 (SFC/E-7).
APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that as a soldier who served his country faithfully for over 20 years, which included during a time of war, he was unfairly denied promotion to the next higher grade. He claims that he performed in the capacity of a SFC/E-7 in numerous positions and believes that based on this service, he should have been promoted along with his peers. He claims that he was made aware that he could appeal this issue by a recent article that appeared in the Army Echoes Newsletter provided to retirees.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
On 31 July 1988, he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD), for the purpose of retirement, after completing 20 years and 8 days of active military service.
The applicant’s Personnel Qualification Record (DA Form 2-1) confirms, in block 18 (Appointments and Reductions), that the highest rank and pay grade he attained while serving on active duty was staff sergeant/E-6 (SSG/E-6). In addition, there are no orders or other documents contained in his Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) that give any indication that he was ever promoted to, held, or served in a higher rank or pay grade while he was serving on active duty.
A Data For Retired Pay (DA Form 3713), prepared on the applicant during his retirement processing, contains the entry SSG/E-6 in Item 2 (Active Duty Grade), Item 3 (Retired Grade), Item 8 (Highest Grade Attained), and Item 10 (Retired Pay), These entries verify that SSG/E-6 was the rank and pay grade he held on the date of his REFRAD, and that it was the highest he held while serving on active duty. This document further confirms that he was placed on the Retired List in the rank and pay grade of SSG/E-6 on 1 August 1988.
The separation document (DD Form 214) issued to and signed by the applicant on the date of his REFRAD confirms that he was promoted to the rank and pay grade of SSG/E-6, effective 1 August 1974, and that he held that rank and pay grade on the date of his separation.
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 12 sets policies and procedures for voluntary retirement of soldiers because of length of service. Paragraph 12-3b states, in pertinent part, that retirement will be in the RA or Reserve grade the soldier holds on the date of retirement as directed in Title 10 of the United States Code, section 3961 (10 USC 3961).
Title 10 of the United States Code, section 3964 provides the legal authority for advancement of warrant officers and enlisted members on the Retired List. It states, in pertinent part, that warrant officer and enlisted members of the Army are entitled, when their active service plus their service on the retired list totals
30 years, to be advanced on the Retired List to the highest grade in which they served on active duty satisfactorily.
Paragraph 12-6 (Advancement on the Retired List) of Army Regulation 635-200, contains regulatory guidance on the advancement of enlisted soldiers on the Retired List. It indicates that advancement on the Retired List is limited to retired soldiers who held a higher grade and successfully served in that higher grade while on active duty. There are no provisions of law or regulation that provide for the advancement of an RA enlisted member, who while serving on active duty in an enlisted status, also served in a dual status as a USAR commissioned officer.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. By law, soldiers retire in the rank and pay grade they hold on the date of their REFRAD for retirement, and in order to be advanced on the Retired List, a soldier must have satisfactorily served on active duty in a higher grade. In order to receive a satisfactory service determination under this statutory provision, a member must have been promoted to, paid as, and satisfactorily served in a higher pay grade while on active duty.
2. The Board notes and certainly recognizes the applicant’s service to this country, and does not dispute his claim that he served in SFC/E-7 positions on numerous occasions during his active duty tenure. However, these factors alone do not provide an evidentiary basis for promotion or advancement on the Retired List. The evidence of record confirms that he was placed on the Retired List in the rank and pay grade of SSG/E-6, which is the highest rank he attained and in which he satisfactorily served while on active duty. Lacking independent evidence to the contrary, the Board finds insufficient evidence to show he was ever promoted to SFC/E-7 while he was on active duty, or to show that he meets the satisfactory service provisions of the advancement law. Thus, the Board finds no error or injustice related to the applicant’s retired rank, and it is compelled to deny the requested relief.
3. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__RVO__ __MKP _ __AAO __ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2002075776 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 2002/10/01 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 129.0400 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076732C070215
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 1 December 1969, the applicant submitted an Application for Voluntary Retirement (DA Form 2339) requesting that he be REFRAD for the purpose of retirement on 30 November 1970, in the rank and pay grade of SSG/E-6. The evidence of record confirms that the highest rank and pay grade the applicant attained while serving on active duty was SSG/E-6.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063318C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT STATES : In effect, that he should be advanced on the Retired List to the highest rank and pay grade in which he served on active duty under the provisions of Title 10 of the United States Code, section 3964 (10 USC 3964), which in his case is SFC/E-7. On 23 January 1968, the applicant submitted an application for voluntary retirement (DA Form 2339) requesting...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059540C070421
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077017C070215
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The DD Form 214 issued to and signed by the applicant on the date of his REFRAD for retirement confirms that he held the rank and pay grade of SSG/E-6 on that date. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001055298C070420
Chapter 7 contained the Army’s enlisted promotion policy and paragraph 7-52 contains guidance on the 2 year service obligation incurred by individuals who were promoted to pay grades E-7, E-8, or E-9, which they were required to serve prior to non-disability retirement. It further stated that any member promoted to such a grade after submitting an application for retirement would be required to submit a written request to withdraw the retirement or to decline the promotion within 15 days...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091703C070212
On 8 January 1990, the applicant submitted an application for voluntary retirement (DA Form 2339) requesting a retirement date of 31 October 1990, in the rank and pay grade of SFC/E-7. It states, in pertinent part, that retired soldiers are entitled to be advanced on the Retired List to the highest grade they held and in which they satisfactorily served on active duty when their active service plus service on the retired list totals 30 years. By law, enlisted soldiers are retired in the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002066460C070402
It further confirms that he held the rank and pay grade of SFC/E-7 on the date of his separation and that on the following day he was placed on the Retired List in that rank and pay grade. By law and regulation, enlisted soldiers are retired in the rank and pay grade they hold on the date of their REFRAD, and retired soldiers are entitled to be advanced on the Retired List to the highest grade in which they satisfactorily served while on active duty, as determined by the Secretary of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007609
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 21 September 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100007609 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to show he was placed on the Retired List as a sergeant first class (SFC)/E-7. The orders show he was placed on the Retired List in the rank of SSG.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064713C070421
On 3 May 1963, the applicant submitted an application for voluntary retirement (DA Form 2339) requesting to be retired, in the rank and pay grade of SFC/E-6. However, this appointment order does not contain an authorization to promote the applicant to a pay grade above E-6. By law and regulation, enlisted soldiers are retired in the rank they hold on the date of their REFRAD and retired soldiers are entitled to be advanced on the Retired List to the highest grade in which they...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062145C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. He also provides documents issued by Department of the Army (DA) that confirm his request for appointment as a warrant officer was denied on two separate occasions, first in 1969 and again in 1972. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant was never actually promoted to or never held the rank and pay grade of WO1/W-1 while he was on active duty.