Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075755C070403
Original file (2002075755C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 3 December 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002075755

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Nancy L. Amos Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Fred N. Eichorn Chairperson
Mr. James E. Anderholm Member
Ms. Charmane Collins Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his Report of Transfer or Discharge, DD Form 214, be corrected to show his new name.

APPLICANT STATES: That he had a legal name change. He provides a Notification of Change in Service Member's Official Records, DD Form 1343, as supporting evidence.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

He enlisted in the Regular Army on 9 March 1966 under the name Don A. O___. His DD Form 214 shows that he was released from active duty on 7 March 1969 under the name of Don A. O___.

The applicant enlisted in the Army National Guard and in the U. S. Army Reserve under the name Don A. O___. He was transferred to the Retired Reserve effective 15 December 1993 under the name Don A. O___.

On an unknown date, the applicant apparently legally changed his name to Denise A. O___.

Army Regulation 635-5 prescribes the separation documents prepared for soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army. It establishes standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214. In pertinent part it states that the DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the soldier’s most recent period of continuous active duty. It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement or discharge.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. For historical purposes, the Army has an interest in maintaining the accuracy of its records. The data and information contained in those records should actually reflect the conditions and circumstances that existed at the time the records were created. In the absence of a showing of material error or injustice, this Board is reluctant to recommend that those records be changed.

2. The applicant’s appropriately served on and was released from active duty under the name Don A. O___. It appears he did not legally change his name until sometime after he was transferred to the Retired Reserve in 1993. While the Board understands his desire to have the records changed, it finds no basis for compromising the integrity of the Army’s records. This Board action will be filed in his military records, as is the DD Form 1343, so a record of his new name will be on hand.
3. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__ FNE _ __JEA___ ___CC__ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2002075755
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 2002/12/02
TYPE OF DISCHARGE (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.



Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009293

    Original file (20110009293.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He would like to have his records corrected to show his name as it is shown on his birth certificate. Therefore, it is appropriate to correct the applicant's records to show only one name. The applicant's birth certificate shows his legal name as Jose V____ G____ and this is also the manner in which the applicant signed the majority of his official documents.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018034

    Original file (20110018034.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests to be awarded the Iraq Campaign Medal (ICM) and correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to reflect awards of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) and ICM, her service in Iraq, and her name change to reflect the official name change recorded on her DD Form 1343 (Notification of Change in Service Member's Official Records), dated 15 July 2009. Her DD Form 214 issued at the time of her retirement reflects the name she enlisted...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060006196C070205

    Original file (20060006196C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, when her husband was notified in 1991 of his eligibility for retired pay at age 60, he was single and listed his sister as the person to receive his RCSBP annuity. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1448 (Application of Plan), provides, in pertinent part, that a person who is not married and has no dependent child upon becoming eligible to participate in the SBP, but who later marries or acquires a dependent child may elect to participate in the Plan. However,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070990C070402

    Original file (2002070990C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that he be reinstated on active duty and credited with the additional six years of service denied him due to his illegal removal from active duty by the Texas Army National Guard (TXARNG). Since the applicant’s allegations of reprisals occurred prior to the enactment of the Whistleblower Act, he does not qualify as a “whistleblower.” Accordingly, his case was considered by this Board, not as a whistleblower case, but as any other application submitted to the Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070001690

    Original file (20070001690.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, changing his last name and his service entry date on his last DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). The applicant's records contain a DD Form 1343 (Notification of Change in Service Member's Official Records), dated 25 April 2003, that shows his last name was changed; however, this form contains incorrect information in Items 10 through 19. Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or injustice now...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040007798C070208

    Original file (20040007798C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s ARNG records are not available to the Board. That would have placed the applicant 46 pounds over the maximum weight allowed at that time, which indicated a lengthy period of time over which he had a weight problem. Army Regulation 600-9 (The Army Weight Control Program) applies to all members of the Active Army, the ARNG, and the U.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070000385C071029

    Original file (20070000385C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    A U. S. Army Criminal Investigation Command Report of Investigation revealed that the applicant, Specialist O___, and one other Soldier were involved in the theft of live fragmentation grenades while performing duties at the Fort Lewis, WA grenade range. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for discharge for the good of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020438

    Original file (20130020438.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011493

    Original file (20140011493.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his retirement orders to show his last name as "R________lave." His retirement orders show his last name spelled as "R______lve". As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his retirement orders to show his name as "R______lave" as shown on the DD Form 1343.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013745

    Original file (20060013745.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests in effect, that he be granted a medical retirement based on his completion of 15 years of qualifying service and medical disqualification for further service in the United States Army Reserve (USAR). It states, in pertinent part, that in the case of a member of the Selected Reserve of a RC who no longer meets the qualifications for membership in the Selected Reserve solely because the member is unfit because of physical disability, the Secretary concerned may, for the...