| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Nancy L. Amos | Analyst |
| Mr. Raymond V. O’Connor, Jr. | Chairperson | ||
| Mr. Thomas B. Redfern, III | Member | ||
| Mr. Donald P. Hupman, Jr. | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable.
APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that his prior good service should have been considered. He provides no supporting evidence.
COUNSEL CONTENDS: Counsel makes no contention.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
He enlisted in the Regular Army on 3 October 1969. He completed basic combat training and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty 12A (Pioneer).
On 2 April 1970, the applicant accepted nonjudicial punishment (NJP) under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) for failing to go to his appointed place of duty. On 20 July 1970, he accepted NJP under Article 15, UCMJ for absenting himself from his appointed place of duty. On 21 January 1971, he accepted NJP under Article 15, UCMJ for absenting himself from his place of duty and disobeying a lawful order. On 19 February 1971, he accepted NJP under Article 15, UCMJ for failing to go to his appointed place of duty and for absenting himself from his unit. On 5 March 1971, he accepted NJP under Article 15, UCMJ for absenting himself from his place of duty and breaking restriction.
On 28 April 1971, the applicant was convicted by a summary court-martial of being absent without leave (AWOL) from 16 to on or about 17 March 1971, from 17 to on or about 29 March 1971, and from 1 April to on or about 5 April 1971. He was sentenced to forfeit $95.00 pay and to be confined at hard labor for 14 days.
On 8 June 1971, the applicant was convicted by a summary court-martial of being AWOL from 21 May to on or about 3 June 1971. He was sentenced to be reduced to pay grade E-1 and to be confined at hard labor for 14 days.
On 23 August 1971, the applicant accepted NJP under Article 15, UCMJ for failing to go to his appointed place of duty.
On 21 January 1972, court-martial charges were preferred against the applicant charging him with AWOL for the periods 22 November to on or about 2 December 1971 and from 7 December 1971 to on or about 20 January 1972.
On 28 January 1972, after consulting with legal counsel, the applicant voluntarily requested a discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10 for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. The applicant was advised of the effects of an undesirable discharge and that he might be deprived of many or all Army and Veterans Administration benefits. He elected not to submit a statement in his own behalf.
On 7 March 1972, the appropriate authority approved the request and directed the applicant receive an undesirable discharge.
On 3 April 1972, the applicant was discharged with an undesirable discharge, in pay grade E-1, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial. He had completed 2 years, 3 months, and 1 day of creditable active service and had 90 days of lost time.
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individual’s admission of guilt. An undesirable discharge was normally considered appropriate.
Army Regulation 635-200 states, in pertinent part, that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor. The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the soldier’s service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel, or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate. A general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. It is issued to a soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
2. The applicant’s voluntary request for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service to avoid trial by court-martial, was administratively correct and in conformance with applicable regulations. There is no indication that the request was made under coercion or duress. Considering the numerous acts of misconduct noted in the applicant's records throughout his service, the type of discharge given was and still is appropriate. An upgrade of his discharge to either general under honorable conditions or to fully honorable is not warranted.
3. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__RVO__ __TBR _ __DPH __ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2002075521 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 2002/11/07 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | UOTHC |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 1972/04/03 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR 65-200, ch 10 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | A70.00 |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 110.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000404
He served in Vietnam from 21 November 1971 to on or about 24 June 1972. On 13 August 1973, consistent with the chain of command recommendations, the separation authority approved the applicant's voluntary request for discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial and directed his reduction to the lowest enlisted grade, if applicable, and issuance of an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. He was discharged accordingly on 21 August 1973.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010930
The Court found him guilty and sentenced him to a reduction to PV1/E-1 and a forfeiture of $25.00 pay. The applicant's records show he submitted a request to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) for an upgrade of his discharge on 17 February 1981 and he was accordingly scheduled for a hearing. The discharge proceedings were conducted in accordance with law and regulations applicable at the time and the character of the discharge is commensurate with the applicant's overall record of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020966
On 22 December 1971, court-martial charges were preferred against him for one specification of being AWOL during the period on or about 23 September 1971 through on or about 29 November 1971. On 29 February 1972, the separation authority approved the applicant's request for discharge for the good of the service - in lieu of court-martial in accordance with Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10. The DD Form 214 he was issued shows he was discharged for the good of the service - in lieu of a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016942
On 12 December 1977, the applicant's discharge was upgraded from an undesirable discharge to a general discharge, under honorable conditions under the DOD SDRP. This program, known as the DOD SDRP, required, in the absence of compelling reasons to the contrary, that a discharge upgrade to either honorable or general be issued in the case of any individual who had either completed a normal tour of duty in Southeast Asia, been wounded in action, been awarded a military decoration other than a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010624
A duly-constituted DD Form 214 that shows he was discharged under other than honorable conditions for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial on 2 October 1972, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10, and issued a DD Form 258A (Undesirable Discharge Certificate). Chapter 10 of the version in effect at the time provided that a member who committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060095C070421
The Board considered the following evidence: On 12 November 1980, the Army Discharge Review Board denied the applicant’s request for an upgraded discharge. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000601
On 18 September 1972, the discharge authority approved his request and directed his reduction to the lowest enlisted grade, his discharge under other than honorable conditions without delay, and the issuance of an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. On 17 April 1979 after careful consideration of his military records and all other available evidence, the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) determined that he was properly discharged and denied his request for a change in the type and nature of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006967
In his request for discharge, he indicated he understood that if his request for discharge was accepted, he may be discharged under other than honorable conditions and be furnished an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. Chapter 10 of the version in effect at the time provided that a member who committed an offense or offenses, for which the authorized punishment included a punitive discharge, could submit a request for discharge for the good of the service at any time after court-martial...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025262
The applicant requests an upgrade of his undesirable discharge to a general under honorable conditions discharge. However, his DD Form 214 for the period ending 13 March 1973 shows he was administratively discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10, separation program number (SPN) 246, discharge for the good of the service - in lieu of trial by court-martial, with issuance of a DD Form 258A (Undesirable Discharge...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013869
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 12 January 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090013869 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a general discharge under honorable conditions. On 29 May 1975, the applicant was accordingly discharged.