Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075038C070403
Original file (2002075038C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 7 November 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002075038

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Jessie B. Strickland Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Raymond V. O’Connor, Jr. Chairperson
Mr. Thomas B. Redfern Member
Mr. Donald P. Hupman Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable.

APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that his records were lost three times while he was in the Army and that he worked 7 days a week at the officer’s mess hall without pay, while he was awaiting trial. He goes on to state that he was seen by a psychiatrist at the time who mentioned a medical discharge. He further states that he is currently under a psychiatrist’s care to deal with the problems of being an abused child and that when President Ford offered everyone a pardon, he was ashamed and was still punishing himself. He also states that he loves his country more than anything in the world and now knows what it means to him. In support of his application he submits a letter from his psychiatrist, a letter from his brother and sister and a local criminal records check.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records, though somewhat incomplete, show:

He was born on 12 June 1947 and enlisted in Detroit, Michigan, on 15 August 1968, for a period of 2 years.

The facts and circumstances surrounding his discharge are not present in the available records. However, his records do contain a duly constituted report of separation (DD Form 214) signed by the applicant, which shows that he went absent without leave (AWOL) from 5 January 1969 to 17 March 1971 and from 24 March through 25 March 1971.

The applicant underwent a psychiatric examination at Fort Riley, Kansas, on 8 April 1971. The examining psychiatrist opined that he had a history of faulty judgment, noncommitment to productive goals, an incapacity to respond to rehabilitative efforts, resentment towards authority, and a tendency to go AWOL when stress arises. He indicated that the applicant had no disqualifying mental or physical defects warranting disposition through medical channels, that he was mentally responsible, and that he was able to distinguish right from wrong and adhere to the right.

On 4 June 1971, he was discharged under other than honorable conditions under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-206, for misconduct – prolonged unauthorized absence for more than 1 year (Desertion). He had served 6 months and 26 days of total active service and had 802 days of lost time due to AWOL. He was separated on temporary records and a soldier’s affidavit.

There is no indication in the available records to show that the applicant ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board’s 15-year statute of limitations.

Army Regulation 635-206, in effect at the time, set forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel for misconduct. It provided, in pertinent part, that members would be processed for separation under that regulation for misconduct, AWOL, desertion, fraudulent entry and conviction by civil authorities. An undesirable discharge was normally considered appropriate.

Army Regulation 635-200, currently in effect, sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted. Chapter 14 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct. Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, commission of a serious offense, conviction by civil authorities, desertion or AWOL. A discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, it must be presumed that the applicant’s administrative separation was accomplished in compliance with applicable regulations with no violations or procedural errors, which would tend to jeopardize his rights.

2. Accordingly, the type of discharge directed and the reasons therefore, were appropriate considering all of the available facts of the case.

3. The applicant’s contentions and supporting documents have been noted by the Board, however, they are not sufficiently mitigating to warrant relief when compared to his undistinguished record of service and extensive period of absence.

4. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__tbr____ __rvo ___ ___dh___ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2002075038
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 2002/11/07
TYPE OF DISCHARGE (UD)
DATE OF DISCHARGE 1971/06/04
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR635-206
DISCHARGE REASON MISCONDUCT
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 627 144.6100/A61.00
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040006868C070208

    Original file (20040006868C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a general, honorable or medical discharge. Army Regulation 635-206, in effect at that time, set forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel for conviction by civil court. Evidence of record shows that during the applicant's military service he received one special court-martial, was confined by military and civilian authorities, was charged and convicted of second degree burglary, and of violating...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067631C070402

    Original file (2002067631C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 27 March 1975, the applicant was discharged, in pay grade E-1, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-206 for civil conviction with an undesirable discharge. There is no evidence of record to show he was wounded in action.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089157C070403

    Original file (2003089157C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant's military records also contain a copy of Headquarters, U.S. Army Training Center Special Orders Number 308, dated 4 November 1969, which shows that the applicant was to report to Fort Dix not later than 1700 hours on 24 November 1969. However, the evidence of record clearly shows that he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013813

    Original file (20110013813.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. Although he contends when he returned from Vietnam he was suffering from PTSD and was in a state of mental distress when he went AWOL, there is no evidence that shows he was diagnosed with any mental condition prior to his discharge. _______ _ _X______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059209C070421

    Original file (2001059209C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a more favorable discharge. On 2 May 1961, the applicant’s commander initiated action to separate the applicant from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-206, based on his conviction by civil authorities.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013059

    Original file (20130013059.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The court sentenced him to 4 years of confinement in the State Penitentiary (suspended) and placed him on probation for 4 years. He was sentenced to 4 years of confinement in the State Penitentiary (suspended) and placed on probation for 4 years.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010762C070208

    Original file (20040010762C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was advised by competent authority of his right to have his case considered by a board of officers; to appear in person before a board of officers; to submit statements in his own behalf; to be represented by counsel; to appeal his civil court conviction; to waive any of this rights; and to withdraw any waiver of rights at any time prior to the date the discharge authority directs or approves his discharge and request his case be presented before a board of officers. On 23...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019821

    Original file (20090019821.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 13 January 1972, the applicant appeared in civil court before a judge and was convicted and sentenced to zero to six years confinement at Ossining Correctional Facility, Ossining, New York. The applicant's request to upgrade his under other than honorable discharge to an honorable was carefully considered and found not to be supported by the evidence. Based on his record of indiscipline, which includes 704 days of lost time due to AWOL and civil confinement, the applicant's service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016423

    Original file (20110016423.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    BOARD DATE: 13 March 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110016423 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. On 2 July 1973, his immediate commander submitted a request for authority to discharge the applicant under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-206 based on his conviction by civil authorities of armed robbery, sentence to 12 years of incarceration, and confinement in a state correctional facility. The evidence of record shows the applicant was convicted by a civil court for armed...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064297C070421

    Original file (2001064297C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: Army Regulation 635-206, in effect at the time, set forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel for misconduct (fraudulent entry, conviction by civil court, and absence without leave or desertion).