Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074730C070403
Original file (2002074730C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 15 April 2003
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002074730

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. W. W. Osborn, Jr. Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. JoAnn H. Langston Chairperson
Mr. Richard T. Dunbar Member
Ms. Yolanda Maldonado Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: The applicant requests that his DD From 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) be corrected to show that he is authorized the Overseas Service Ribbon.

APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that he is retroactively qualified because of his Army status subsequent to the introduction of the award. He submits an 18 October 2001 leave and earnings statement to show that he was serving, in pay grade E-8, as an active participant in the Army Reserve (USAR).

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:


He served on active duty in the Regular Army from 23 February 1971 to 22 February 1974. He attained the rank of specialist (E-4) in MOS 36C20 (field wireman). He served an unaccompanied tour of 13 months in Korea. In 1991 he became an active participant in the USAR.

Army Regulation 600-8-22 states that effective 1 August 1981, all active members of the Army who successfully complete an overseas tour are eligible for the Overseas Service Ribbon. Completion of an overseas tour must be in accordance with Army Regulation 614-30. The ribbon may be awarded retroactively to those who qualified prior to 1 August 1981 only if they had an Active Army status on or after that date.
 
During the processing of this case a telephone conversation was held, on 20 February 2003 with the Total Army Personnel Command, Awards Branch. The Awards Branch advised that the term "Active Army" was intended to mean Active Federal Service. This information was accepted as an advisory opinion and, in accordance with established policy, it was forwarded to the applicant for rebuttal.

The applicant responded by furnishing a copy of his ARPC Form 249-2-E (Chronological Statement of Retirement Points) and contending that his "Active Duty points," as shown in column 8 of the form, demonstrate that he has been on active duty since 1 August 1981.


DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, and advisory opinion(s), it is concluded:

1. The applicant's ARPC Form 249-2-E shows only that he was credited with active duty points. Those active duty points could have been earned by performing Active Duty Training or in an Active Federal Status. In the absence of evidence showing that he served in an Active Federal Status, there is an insufficient basis to conclude that he is eligible for an award of the Overseas Service Ribbon.

2. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

3. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__JHL___ __RTD__ __YM ___ DENY APPLICATION




                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2002074730
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20030415
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 107.00
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009854

    Original file (20100009854.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record confirms the applicant served on active duty from 31 January 1964 through 20 January 1967 and there is no derogatory information in the available record that would have disqualified him for award of the AGCM (1st Award). The evidence of record shows the applicant had active status in the Active Army, USAR, or ARNG during the period 21 January 1967 through 19 February 1988 and he completed an overseas tour in Germany. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003818C070206

    Original file (20050003818C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that his National Guard service was from March 1981 to December 1992 with a few breaks in active Army Reserve. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the National Defense Service Medal is awarded for honorable active service for any period between 2 August 1990 to 25 November 1995. Therefore, the evidence does not justify correcting his records to show this award.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018286

    Original file (20110018286.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The ARCOTR may be awarded retroactively to those personnel who successfully completed AT or ADT on foreign soil in a Reserve status prior to 11 July 1984 provided they had an active status on or after 11 July 1984. c. the AFRM require that a minimum of 50 retirement points be earned for each of the 10 qualifying years and that the qualifying service be completed within 12 consecutive years. The evidence of record shows the applicant served in Korea during a qualifying period of service for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021824

    Original file (20120021824.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His records contain a Chronological Record of Military Service, dated 18 October 1989, wherein it shows, he had 13 years, 10 months, and 5 days of qualifying service for retirement as of 2 November 1989 and a total of 2,396 retirement points. The applicant provides, and his records contain, a Chronological Statement of Retirement Points, dated 13 July 2011, wherein it shows he had 19 years, 6 months, and 18 days of qualifying service for retirement as of 20 July 1991 and a total of 2,676...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062721C070421

    Original file (2001062721C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that she be granted entitlement to annuity benefits from the Reserve Component-Survivor Benefit Program (RC-SBP) based upon her deceased husband’s, the former service member (FSM), years of service in the Army National Guard (ARNG) and Army Reserve (USAR). A subsequent Chronological Record of Military Service (ARPC Form 249-3), dated 29 July 1994, indicates only one qualifying year between the retirement year ending (RYE) 30 June 1958 and the 12 August...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001432

    Original file (20110001432.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show awards of the: * Overseas Service Ribbon * Army Reserve Components Achievement Medal * Army Good Conduct Medal * Army Achievement Medal 2. He adds: * He deployed to Landstuhl, Germany, for 15 months * He completed many outstanding drills and annual training as an officer from 1991 to 2006 * He was an enlisted combat medic in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) from 1986...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020039

    Original file (20100020039.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the AFEM is authorized for participants in military operations within a specific geographic area during a specified time period. The regulation states that effective 1 August 1981, all members of the Active Army, Army National Guard, and Army Reserve in an active Reserve status are eligible for the award upon successful completion of initial entry training. The award may be awarded retroactively to those personnel who completed the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067568C070402

    Original file (2002067568C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    As supporting evidence he provides the 22 September 1988 letter from his doctor, an ARPC Form 249-2-E dated 2 March 2000, a 4 December 2001 letter from the U. S. Army Reserve Personnel Command (AR-PERSCOM) denying his application for retired pay, a Retirement Points Accounting System Summary Points Inquiry dated 4 December 2001, and his discharge orders dated 28 September 1988. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010861

    Original file (20130010861.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he completed 8 years of qualifying Reserve service, that he transferred to the Retired Reserve, and he is entitled to retired pay retroactive to July 2007. Chapter 2 provides in: a. paragraph 2-1 that to be eligible for retired pay, an individual need not have a military status at the time of application, but must have attained age 60, completed a minimum of 20 years of qualifying service, and served the last 8 years of his/her...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022056

    Original file (20100022056.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 13 April 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100022056 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. She provided LESs and documentation which show active duty periods while she served in the USAR (drill weekends, annual training, and additional active duty service) during the period 1981 to 1984. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. directing the U.S. Army Human Resources Command to...