| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Joyce A. Wright | Analyst |
| Mr. Roger W. Able | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Bernard P. Ingold | Member | |
| Ms. Karen Y. Fletcher | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that her Reentry (RE) Code of "4" be changed to a more favorable code.
APPLICANT STATES: That she received an honorable discharge with issuance of an RE code of "4"; however, her RE code prevents her from obtaining information in reference to the US Army Reserve or any other related service.
In support of her application, she submits a copy of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty).
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
She enlisted on 4 September 1980 and remained on active duty through a series of reenlistments. She was promoted to the pay grade of E-5 effective 13 May 1986.
On 1 November 1991, the applicant was notified of her Headquarters Department of the Army (HQDA) bar to reenlistment under the Qualitative Management Program (QMP). The basis for the determination was two Noncommissioned Officer Evaluation Reports (NCOER) which indicated that she displayed weaknesses in performance and efficiency
and physical fitness/weight.
The applicant appealed the bar through her chain of command to the DA
Standby Advisory Board (STAB), which was denied on 16 June 1992. The
STAB stated that the past performance and estimated potential of the applicant were not in keeping with the standards expected of the NCO Corps and that
the bar would remain in effect.
The applicant was honorably discharged on 29 July 1992, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 16-8, due to reduction in force. She had completed 12 years, 2 months, and 10 days of creditable service.
Item 27 (Reenlistment Code) of the applicant’s DD Form 214 shows the entry "4" and item 26 (Separation Code) shows the entry "JCC."
Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Paragraph 16-8 of this regulation sets forth the requirements for early separation of enlisted personnel due to reduction in force, strength limitations, or budgetary constraints. The service of personnel separated under this paragraph will be characterized as honorable.
Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. Army Regulation 601-210 covers eligibility criteria,
policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing into the Regular Army (RA) and the US Army Reserve. Chapter 3 of that regulation prescribes basic eligibility for prior service applicants for enlistment. That chapter includes a list of
Armed Forces RE codes, including RA RE codes.
RE–4 applies to persons not qualified for continued service by virtue of being separated from the service with non-waivable disqualifications such as persons with a HQDA bar to reenlistment.
Army Regulation 635-5-1 states that separation program designator (SPD) codes are three-character alphabetic combinations, which identify reasons for, and types of separation from active duty. The primary purpose of SPD codes is to provide statistical accounting of reasons for separation. They are intended exclusively for the internal use of DOD and the military services to assist in the collection and analysis of separation data. It notes that "JCC" is the appropriate SPD for individuals separated upon completion of an enlistment contract but who are "ineligible for, barred from, or otherwise denied reenlistment."
A "cross-reference" chart, provided by officials from the separations branch at the U.S. Total Army Personnel Command, shows that generally an “RE-3” is the appropriate RE code for individuals who receive an SPD code of JCC. However, that same chart shows that individuals discharged under QMP will receive an RE Code of 4.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The Board notes that the RE-4 is consistent with the basis for her separation and in this case finds no basis to correct the existing code.
2. The type of discharge directed and the reasons for that separation were appropriate considering all of the facts of the case.
3. The applicant has failed to show, through the evidence submitted with her application or the evidence of record, that her separation under QMP which resulted in her receiving an RE code of RE "4" was in error or unjust.
4. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show
to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that
the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence
that would satisfy this requirement.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__ra___ ___bi__ __kf____ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2002074689 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20021212 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | HD |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 19910729 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . 635-200, C 16 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 4 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002079217C070215
Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. It notes that "JCC" is the appropriate SPD for individuals separated upon completion of an enlistment contract but who are "ineligible for, barred from, or otherwise denied reenlistment."
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063935C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Certain persons who have received nonjudicial punishment are so disqualified, as are persons with bars to reenlistment, and those discharged under the provisions of chapter 9, 10, 13, 14, and 16 of Army Regulation 635-200.Army Regulation 635-5-1 states that SPD codes are...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013927
Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. The applicant was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), paragraph 16-8, by reason of a reduction in force on 27 December 1995 with a separation program designator (SPD) code of JCC. Further, the record does not contain and the applicant has not...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002148
It further allowed Soldiers who perceived that they will be unable to overcome a Headquarters, Department of the Army (HQDA) bar to reenlistment to be discharged upon their request and stated that these Soldiers could request discharge at any time after receipt of the HQDA bar to reenlistment from unit commanders or upon notification that an appeal of the bar to reenlistment was disapproved. The SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table in effect at the time establishes that RE-2B will normally be...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070005381C071029
Fields | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. On 25 October 1995, the Commander, United States Army Enlisted Records and Evaluation Center (EREC) notified the applicant's command that his QMP appeal had been carefully reviewed by a Department of the Army (DA) Stand- By Advisory Board (STAB) and disapproved. Therefore, the SPD and RE code assignment were appropriate and remain valid based on the authority and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021404
The applicant provides copies of the following: * DA Form 2-1 * DA Form 2166-7 (NCOER) * DA Form 4/1 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document Armed Forces of the United States) * Active Duty Retention Based on Duty Performance memorandum * Three QMP Appeal memoranda * Appeal to DA Bar to Reenlistment memorandum * Orders 024-00255 * DD Form 214 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. A memorandum from the U.S. Army Enlisted Records and Evaluation Center (EREC), Fort Benjamin Harrison, IN, dated 5 April...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013639
BOARD DATE: 2 December 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100013639 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. _______ _ x_______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024728
Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) states that the SPD codes are three-character alphabetic combinations which identify reasons for, and types of, separation from active duty. The evidence of record shows that the applicants records were considered by a QMP and that he was not selected for continued service. The RE code of 4 was the appropriate code for the applicant based on the guidance provided in applicable regulation for Soldiers separating under the QMP.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016249C070206
It also shows the SPD code with a corresponding RE code and states that more than one RE code could apply. The regulation shows that the SPD "JCC", as shown on the applicant's DD Form 214, is appropriate for discharge when the narrative reason for discharge is "reduction in force" due to a HQDA bar to reenlistment. The evidence shows that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 16, paragraph 16-8, due to reduction in force.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050007771C070206
The applicant’s record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army and entered active duty on 24 September 1976. The separation document (DD Form 214) issued to the applicant upon his discharge confirms the applicant was separated under the provisions of paragraph 16-8, Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of reduction in authorized strength-qualitative early transition program. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE...