| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. G. E. Vandenberg | Analyst |
| Mr. Samuel A. Crumpler | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Ted S. Kanamine | Member | |
| Ms. Shirley L. Powell | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his second discharge be upgraded.
APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that he had been a good service member until he got tired and fed up and then made some stupid mistakes. He states that the problems started after his return from Vietnam when he again got mixed up with drugs.
He contends that the letters of reference that he submits show that he has gotten his life together and warrants an upgrade.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
The applicant entered active duty on 7 August 1969 on a three-year active duty service obligation. He completed basic combat training, advanced individual training and was awarded the military occupational specialty (MOS) 55B (Ammunition Storage Specialist). He reenlisted on 15 May 1970 after 9 months and 8 days of service.
The applicant served in Vietnam in the military occupational specialty (MOS) 55B (Ammunition Storage Specialist) with the 46th Ordnance Company from 4 September 1970 through 28 November 1970; the 504th Ordnance Detachment from 29 November 1970 trough 30 July 1971; and the 611th Ordnance Company from 31 July 1971 through 31 August 1971.
The applicant received non-judicial punishment (NJP) under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) on 4 February 1971, for twice sleeping on his guard post, and on 28 July 1971, for breaking restriction.
On 29 May 1971, a special court-martial found the applicant guilty of possession of narcotics paraphernalia and possession of marijuana. His sentence included reduction in grade and 3 months confinement. The confinement was suspended for 6 months.
The applicant is reported to have been absent without leave or in confinement for the following periods, 20 March 1972 through 9 April 1972, 13 April 1972 through 2 July 1973, 4 July 1972 through 31 January 1973, 12 through 14 March 1973, 4 February 1973, and 5 February 1973 through 31 October 1973.
While in an AWOL status the applicant was arrested on drug charges by civilian authorities. On 9 February 1973, he was found guilty of being an accessory to the selling of dangerous drugs. He was placed on probation and returned to military control.
On 3 August 1973, the applicant’s company commander recommended that the applicant be discharged based upon the civilian conviction and his subsequent misconduct.
On 25 September 1973, after consulting with counsel, the applicant acknowledged he had been advised of and understood his rights under the Uniform Code of Military Justice. He acknowledged that he could receive an undesirable discharge (UD) which would deprive him of many or all of his benefits as a veteran and that he could expect to experience substantial prejudice in civilian life if he received a discharge under other than honorable conditions.
The discharge authority approved the applicant’s discharge, and directed that he be reduced to the lowest enlisted grade and discharged with the issuance of an Undesirable Discharge Certificate.
The applicant was discharged on 19 November 1973, with an under conditions other than honorable characterization of service. He was shown to have had 3 years, 4 months, and 9 days of creditable service with 604 days of lost time.
The applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) in 1975. At that time he stated at he had been using illegal drugs since his sophomore year of high school and was still using them when he enlisted. He states that he kicked the habit until he was sent to Vietnam when he got back into using drugs because he felt his job was insignificant. He stated that he started selling drugs and became addicted to heroin. He tested positive on a random urinalysis and was sent to a drug dependence program at Fort Hood, Texas. Upon release from the program he was transferred to Fort Carson but not allowed to work in his MOS. This caused him to revert to drug use and sales again. He was arrested and convicted by civilian authorities for a felony offense and released to the Army on probation. Because he was not able work in his MOS he again went AWOL. On 21 July 1976, the ADRB denied relief.
The applicant submits a statement from the Burns Police Department indicating they had no record of negative police involvement from 1974 to 1995.
He also submits three letters of reference from employers who describe him as a valuable employee, with an excellent job attitude. He is described as well liked and respected by his co-workers.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record and applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The discharge proceedings were conducted in accordance with law and regulations applicable at the time. The character of the discharge is commensurate with the applicant's overall record of military service.
2. While the Board notes the applicant’s admission of a drug problem and the positive actions he has taken to overcome that problem, it finds these efforts are not so meritorious as to outweigh the offense that led to his discharge.
3. The letters attesting to the applicant’s good character and post-service adjustment and conduct are also noted, but they are insufficient as the sole basis for relief because they do not outweigh the repeated misconduct that led to the applicant’s separation.
4. The applicant's misconduct, 604 days lost due to incarceration or AWOL, outweighs his 30 months of honorable service and tour in Vietnam. Therefore, the Board concludes that there is insufficient evidence to grant the requested relief.
5. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
6. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
INDEX
| CASE ID | AR2002074479 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20030311 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 144. |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150004493
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 2 June 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20150004493 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant provides * self-authored statement * Standard Form (SF) 601 (Immunization Record) * page 4 of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) * DD Form 214 * letter, dated 3 April 2015, to the applicant from the Army Review Boards Agency * letter, dated 23 April 2015, to the applicant from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) with enclosure (Patient Inquiry) *...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004494
The DD Form 214 he was issued does not show the Bronze Star Medal or the Combat Infantryman Badge. Additionally, appendix V of U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) provides that during the Vietnam era, the Combat Infantryman Badge was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11D, 11F, 11G, or 11H. The evidence of record is void of orders showing the applicant was awarded the Bronze Star Medal.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060014928
The punishment included a reduction to sergeant, pay grade E5, forfeiture of $100.00 pay per month for 2 months (suspended), and 14 days extra duty. He stated that upon his arrival to Fort Carson he received $220.00 in July 1972; no pay in August or September 1972; $9.00 in October; and about $25.00 in the months of November and December 1972. On 31 October 1973, the board of officers recommended that the applicant be discharged from the service and issued an Undesirable Discharge Certificate.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000892
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 30 April 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090000892 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a general under honorable conditions discharge. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060014734
There are no orders in the applicants military service records which show that he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge. Records show the applicant served in 3 campaigns in Vietnam. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned to show award of the Vietnam Service Medal with 3 bronze service stars, Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, and 1 Overseas Service Bar.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020312
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant's military service records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 19 January 1971 for 2 years. However, the evidence of record shows the applicant enlisted for the 55B, Ammunition Specialty course.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005608
DA Pamphlet 672-3 shows during his assignment to the 15th Supply and Service Company, 1st Cavalry Division (from on or about 12 October 1969 to 12 December 1970) this unit was cited for awards of the: * Valorous Unit Award for the period 1 May to 29 June 1970 based on DAGO Number 43, dated 1972 * Meritorious Unit Commendation for service from 1 June 1968 to 30 November 1969, based on DAGO Number 2, dated 1972 * Meritorious Unit Commendation for service from 1 January to 31 December 1970...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074877C070403
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. He apparently served in Vietnam during his first term of service because his DD Form 214 for the period ending 28 April 1969 shows he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Parachutist Badge, the Vietnam Service Medal, the Vietnam Campaign Medal with device 1960, the Army Commendation Medal, and the Bronze Star Medal. Without his DA Form 20 or other records...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070005537C071029
There are no orders in the applicant's military personnel records awarding him the Army Commendation Medal, the Good Conduct Medal, and the Combat Infantryman Badge. In the absence of a proper award authority for this decoration, the applicant may request award of the Army Commendation Medal under the provisions of Section 1130 of Title 10, United States Code. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002103
c. Item 24 shows he was authorized one overseas service bar; however, he served in Vietnam for three 6-month periods during this period of service. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show he was authorized three overseas service bars. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of this DD Form 214 to show he was authorized three overseas service bars.