| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Nancy L. Amos | Analyst |
| Mr. Arthur A. Omartian | Chairperson | ||
| Mr. Kenneth W. Lapin | Member | ||
| Mr. Donald P. Hupman, Jr. | Member |
2. The applicant requests, in effect, promotion reconsideration to captain.
3. The applicant states that his educational institution sent a letter to the 2001 captain promotion board stating he completed the requirements for his bachelor of science degree; however, the block for educationally qualified was never checked and therefore the promotion board never saw the letter or the transcript.
4. The applicant’s military records show that, after having had prior enlisted service, he was commissioned a second lieutenant in the Army National Guard on 27 September 1994. He was promoted to first lieutenant on 3 December 1996.
5. On 26 April 2001, the applicant was notified that he was considered but not selected for promotion to captain because his records indicated he had not completed the required civilian and/or military education by the day the board convened.
6. On 2 November 2001, the Office of Admissions and Records, Cameron University, Lawton, OK faxed a letter to the attention of the president of the captain promotion board stating the applicant had met the requirements for a Bachelor of Science degree. (A copy of this letter, sans letterhead and fax indicator, contained an additional phrase indicating he would be awarded his degree with a date of 15 December 2001.) The applicant was considered for promotion to captain by the promotion selection board which convened on 12 November 2001. The applicant's degree certificate is dated 15 December 2001.
7. Army Regulation 135-155 prescribes policy and procedures used in the selection and promotion of commissioned officers of the Army National Guard of the United States and of commissioned and warrant officers of the U. S. Army Reserve. Paragraph 2-9 states that, effective 1 October 1995, no person may be selected for promotion to the Reserve grade of captain unless, not later than the day before the selection board convene date, that person has been awarded a baccalaureate degree from an accredited institution. It also states that promotion reconsideration by a standby advisory board (STAB) may only be based on erroneous non-consideration or material error which existed in the records at the time of consideration. Material error in this context is one or more errors of such a nature that, in the judgment of the reviewing official (or body) it caused an individual's non-selection by a promotion board and, had such error(s) been corrected at the time the individual was considered, a reasonable chance would have resulted that the individual would have been recommended for promotion.
8. Title 10, U. S. Code, section 12205 provides that no person may be appointed to a grade above the grade of first lieutenant in the Army Reserve or be federally recognized in a grade above the grade of first lieutenant as a member of the Army National Guard unless that person has been awarded a baccalaureate degree by a qualifying educational institution.
9. In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, U. S. Total Army Personnel Command. That office noted that when the applicant's file was considered by the 2001 Department of the Army Reserve Components Selection Board, he was not educationally qualified. It noted the Board has the authority to grant him a waiver for the date that the degree was awarded or he could contact the university and request that the date the degree was awarded be changed to a date prior to 12 November 2001. (Conversation between the Office of Admissions and Records and the analyst on 18 September 2002 elicited the information that they would not do this. They only issue degrees three times a year.) If he is granted a waiver for the date of the degree, he would have a basis to be considered by a special board under the 2001 criteria. That office recommended that the applicant's request be disapproved.
10. A copy of the advisory opinion was provided to the applicant for comment or rebuttal. He did not respond within the given time frame.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. Notwithstanding the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, U. S. Total Army Personnel Command recommendation in its advisory opinion, it appears that it would be equitable to reconsider the applicant for promotion to captain under the 2001 criteria.
2. Regulatory and statutory guidance is that, in order to be selected for promotion to the Reserve grade of captain, a person must be awarded a baccalaureate degree from an accredited institution not later than the day before the selection board convene date. In this case, the selection board convened on 12 November 2001. Because the university's policy was to award degrees only on three specific dates a year, the applicant was not awarded his baccalaureate degree until 15 December 2001. However, he had completed the requirements for the degree on 2 November 2001 and it was only because of the university's administrative policy that he was not awarded the degree prior to the convene date of the selection board.
3. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by:
a. showing that the applicant was awarded his baccalaureate degree on 2 November 2001 (but ceremoniously presented his degree on 15 December 2001); and
b. submitting his records to a duly constituted STAB under 2001 criteria for promotion reconsideration to captain.
2. That, if selected, the applicant's records be further corrected by showing he was promoted to captain on his date of eligibility as determined by appropriate officials provided he was otherwise qualified for promotion.
3. That, if not selected, the applicant be so notified.
BOARD VOTE:
__AAO__ __KWL__ __DPH__ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
___Arthur A. Omartian___
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2002074232 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 2002/09/24 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 131.11 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003083693C070212
In his advisory opinion, the Chief, Special Actions Branch, stated that the Board has the authority to grant a waiver or exception to policy for the date the degree was conferred, and since the applicant completed all requirements prior to the board, he recommended that the applicant be granted a waiver for the educational requirement. Paragraph 2-9, of the above regulations states, "Effective 1 October 1995, no person may be selected for promotion to the Reserve grade of CPT unless, not...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004105003C070208
The applicant was apparently considered but not selected for promotion to captain for the first time in 2001. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing that he was awarded his baccalaureate degree on 21 October 2002 (but ceremoniously presented his degree on 30 November 2002); and b. submitting his...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060004124C070205
In an advisory opinion, dated 4 April 2006, the Chief, Promotions Branch, Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, HRC, St. Louis, Missouri, stated that the applicant's transcript for his baccalaureate degree from Buxton University was viewed by the 2005 RCSB. The HRC, Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, has recommended the applicant be granted a civilian education waiver since he did not know at the time the degree was conferred that Buxton University was not an accredited...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040009866C070208
On 17 April 2003, the applicant was notified he was considered but not selected for promotion to captain because his records indicated he had not completed the required civilian and/or military education by the day the board convened. The advisory opinion noted the applicant was considered and not selected for promotion by the 2002 and 2003 promotion boards. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing he...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010577
On 14 September 2007, the National Guard Bureau, Arlington, Virginia, published Orders 257-5, honorably discharging the applicant from the ARNG, effective 9 July 2007, and terminating her Reserve of the Army and Army of the United States appointments. On 13 May 2008, by memorandum, the applicant requested a waiver of the statutory education requirements for promotion to CPT. However, there is no evidence in the applicant's records and the applicant did not provide any evidence that shows...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087572C070212
In this reply, he was advised that he had been nonselected for promotion because he had not met the civilian education requirement, a baccalaureate degree, and in addition, two missing officer evaluation reports (OERs) (OERs with ending dates of 31 May 1999 and 7 January 2000) were not seen by the boards. The applicant was considered for promotion by the 2000 and 2001 DA Reserve Components Major, Selection Board, and was not selected based on his not having completed the required civilian...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070013267
In an advisory opinion from the Chief, Special Actions Branch, Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, USAHRC, dated 3 October 2007, it stated that the applicant's record was considered, but not selected by the 2004, 2005, and 2006 Captain Department of the Army Reserve Component Selection Board because the applicant did not meet the required civilian education prior to the convening date of the board. The applicant requested consideration for a Special Selection Board; however, Special...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120014844
The applicant provides: * a DA Form 2B (Personnel Qualification Record) * a Reserve Status Statement and Election of Options * eleven emails * three memoranda for record * two memoranda * one All Army Activities (ALARACT) message * one military personnel (MILPER) message * a page from the U.S Army Human Resources Command (HRC) Website * a letter of completion request * an application for diploma * a 3-page worksheet CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. He submitted three memoranda, dated 19...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020845
The regulation further specifies that the Chief, Office of Promotions, is the approval authority for all current year criteria requests for exception to non-statutory promotion requirements (i.e., civilian education), and that requests must contain complete justification and be received prior to the board convening date. The evidence of record shows the applicant was twice considered for promotion to CPT but he was not selected by reason of not being educationally qualified. As a result,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086330C070212
He was considered and not selected for promotion to captain by the 1999 and 2000 Reserve Components Selection Boards (RCSB’s), which convened on 9 November 1999 and 13 November 2000, respectively. The Board concludes that it would be unjust to deny the applicant promotion reconsideration based on the technicality that his degree was not formally conferred prior to the convening date of the 2000 promotion board given he had completed all the academic requirements for a BA degree prior to the...