Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073968C070403
Original file (2002073968C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 29 August 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002073968

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. William Blakely Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. Margaret K. Patterson Chairperson
Mr. Christopher J. Prosser Member
Mr. Harry B. Oberg Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his pay grade be upgraded based on his time served in the Army.

APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that he was reduced in rank as a result of nonjudicial punishment (NJP) he accepted in October 1983, for assault with a deadly weapon. He claims that these charges were later dropped in February of 1984.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

On 27 August 1981, the applicant entered the Army for a period of 3 years. He was trained and served in military occupational specialty (MOS) 31V (Tactical Communications Operator). During his tenure on active duty, he was awarded the Good Conduct Medal, the Army Service Ribbon, and the Overseas Service Ribbon.

The applicant’s Personnel Qualification Record (DA Form 2-1) shows, in
Item 18 (Appointments and Reductions), that the highest rank and pay grade he attained while serving on active duty was private first class/E-3 (PFC/E-3). He was first promoted to PFC/E-3 on 14 March 1983, but was reduced from that rank to private/E-1 (PV1) on 19 May 1983. He was again promoted to
PFC/E-3 on 1 February 1984, but was again reduced to PV1 on 5 March 1984.

The applicant’s disciplinary history includes his acceptance of NJP on three separate occasions. The first on 19 May 1983, for assaulting a noncommissioned officer (NCO) and for being drunk and disorderly. His punishment for these offenses included a reduction to PV1. He accepted the second NJP on 22 November 1983, for being absent without leave from
5 to 8 November 1983. On 5 March 1984, he accepted his third NJP, for disobeying a lawful order by consuming alcohol in the barracks. His punishment for this offense also included a reduction to PV1.

On 20 August 1984, the applicant was honorably discharged in the rank and pay grade of PV1, by reason of expiration term of service, after completing 2 years,
11 months, and 15 days of active military service.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations it is concluded:

1. The Board notes the applicant’s contention that his rank and pay grade should be reinstated to PFC/E-3 because of the time he served on active duty, and because the charges that resulted in his reduction in October 1983 were later dropped in February 1984. However, it finds no evidentiary basis to support these claims or that would warrant granting the requested relief.

2. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant was reduced to PV1 on
5 March 1984, due to his own misconduct, and that this was the rank and pay grade he held on the date of his separation. Therefore, the Board is satisfied that the rank and pay grade recorded in the applicant’s separation document were entered in accordance with the applicable regulation. As a result, the Board concludes that there is no basis for changing the applicant’s rank and pay grade at this time.

3. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__MKP__ __CJP __ _ _HBO __ DENY APPLICATION




                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2002073968
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 2002/08/29
TYPE OF DISCHARGE (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 131.0900
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.



Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002079529C070215

    Original file (2002079529C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 214 issued to and signed by the applicant on the date of his separation, 15 June 1984, confirms that he was honorably separated in the rank and pay grade of PFC/E-3 on that date. Army Regulation 635-5 prescribes the separation documents which are prepared for individuals upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant was reduced to PFC/E-3, effective 11 October 1983.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057616C070420

    Original file (2001057616C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that her Report of Separation and Record of Service (NGB Form 22) be corrected to show her correct rank and pay grade of specialist/E-4 (SPC/E-4). The record also contains Orders Number 113-41, dated 1 June 1984, published by the Military Department of the State of Oklahoma, which authorized the applicant’s discharge from the ARNG, effective 27 May 1984. Army Regulation 135-178, in effect at the time, set forth the basic authority for the administrative...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | AR20080018160

    Original file (AR20080018160.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his 1984 bad conduct discharge be upgraded to general, under honorable conditions. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. The evidence of record failed to establish a basis upon which clemency could be granted and upon which the severity of the punishment imposed could be moderated with an upgrade of the applicant's bad conduct discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003470

    Original file (20130003470.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record shows the applicant received NJP on 23 February 1972 and his punishment was, in part, reduction in pay grade to E-2 suspended for 60 days. The evidence of record shows the applicant was then reduced (by court-martial) to PV1 (E-1) on 20 May 1972. There is no evidence of record that shows the applicant was advanced or promoted in rank/grade at any time after he was reduced to PV1 (E-1) on 20 May 1972.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019450

    Original file (20090019450.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). His DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) shows he was discharged under the provisions of paragraph 13-4c of Army Regulation 635-200 with an under honorable conditions character of service. The evidence of record shows he accepted NJP on 26 March 1979 for various infractions that resulted in his reduction to PVT/E-1.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070000134C071029

    Original file (20070000134C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides an unofficial transcript and a State of Colorado Training Certificate in support of his application. On 12 July 1984, the unit commander notified the applicant that he was initiating action to separate the applicant under the provisions of chapter 13, Army Regulation 635-200, for unsatisfactory performance. On 14 July 1984, the separation authority approved the separation action and directed the applicant receive a GD, and on 24 July 1984, the applicant was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010999C071029

    Original file (20060010999C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his general, under honorable conditions discharge (GD) be upgraded to an honorable discharge (HD). There is no indication that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) for an upgrade of his discharge within the ADRB's 15-year statute of limitations. Further, the applicant's misconduct clearly diminished his overall record of service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003939

    Original file (20140003939.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR) by: a. revoking the DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action), dated 24 February 2012, which erroneously advanced him from the rank/grade of private (PV1)/E-1 to the rank/grade of private (PV2)/E-2 and removing it from his AMHRR; b. amending the DA Form 2627 (Record of Proceedings Under Article 15, Uniform Code for Military Justice (UCMJ)), dated 4 April 2012, to show he held the rank/grade of private first class...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011840

    Original file (20130011840.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 1 August 1989, consistent with the chain of command's recommendations, the separation authority approved the administrative discharge and ordered the applicant discharged under the provisions of paragraph 14-12b of Army Regulation 635-200 by reason of misconduct and directed issuance of a General Discharge Certificate. A discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally appropriate for a Soldier discharged under this chapter. His discharge was appropriate because the quality...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013457

    Original file (20080013457.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no indication in the applicant’s records that he was advanced beyond the rank/grade of PV2/E-2 during his active military service. Item 18 (Appointments and Reductions) of the applicant’s DA Form 2-1 shows the applicant’s ranks and dates of rank as follows: PVT/E-1, 9 May 1977; PV2/E-2, 10 November 1977; PVT/E-1, 7 March 1978; PV2/E-2, 1 March 1979; PVT/E-1, 28 September 1979; and PV2/E-2, 17 March 1980. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show he completed...