Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073824C070403
Original file (2002073824C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 22 October 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002073824


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Jessie B. Strickland Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Fred N. Eichorn Chairperson
Ms. Shirley L. Powell Member
Mr. Elzey J. Arledge, Jr. Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)

FINDINGS :

1. The applicant has exhausted or the Board has waived the requirement for exhaustion of all administrative remedies afforded by existing law or regulations.


2. The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to show that he possessed the additional skill identifier (ASI) of R3 and that he be awarded the Good Conduct Medal (GCMDL).

3. The applicant states, in effect, that his report of separation (DD Form 214) incorrectly shows his military occupational specialty (MOS) as 13A10M5 and should show it as 13A10M5R3 and he should have received a GCMDL.

4. The applicant’s military records show that he was inducted on 11 February 1971. He successfully completed his training as a field artillery cannon crewman and was awarded the MOS 13A10. He was transferred to Germany on 7 July 1971 and was assigned to a nuclear duty position in an artillery unit using 8-inch howitzers.

5. His records also show that he was promoted to the pay grade of E-4 on 9 March 1972 in the MOS of 13A10M5, that he was in the Personnel Reliability Program (PRP) for nuclear surety, and that he was placed on travel and assignment restrictions due to the sensitive nature of his assignment as a special weapons assembler.

6. On 1 December 1972, he was honorably released from active duty for the purpose of attending school. He had served 1 year, 9 months and 21 days of total active service and was transferred to the United States Army Reserve Control Group (Annual Training). His DD Form 214 shows that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal and that he attended the 8-inch Pre-Fire course for a period of 1 week. His records also show that he had excellent conduct and efficiency ratings and contain no information of a derogatory nature.

7. Army Regulation 611-201 provides the enlisted MOS structure for the Army and provides the qualifications and training necessary for award of the applicable ASI for each MOS. It provides, in pertinent part, that ASI “M5” denotes nuclear operations with the 8 inch howitzer and involves assembly, disassembly and pre-fire procedures for the 8-inch nuclear projectile. ASI “R3” denotes nuclear security and involves physical security, including accident/incident control, firefighting, emergency destruction of nuclear weapons during movement, in storage and in tactical situations. On the job training (OJT) is the prerequisite for award of ASI “R3.”

8. Army Regulation 672-5-1, in effect at the time, also established the criteria for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM). It states, in pertinent part, that the AGCM was established by Executive Order 8809, 28 June 1941 and was amended by Executive Order 9323, 1943 and by Executive Order 10444, 10 April 1953 and is awarded for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and fidelity in active Federal military service. The regulation also states, in pertinent part, that for first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950, a period of service of less than 3 years but more than 1 year qualifies for award of the AGCM. The regulation outlines the criteria for award of the Good Conduct Medal (GCMDL) and provides, in pertinent part, that the GCMDL is awarded for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and fidelity in active Federal military service. It is awarded on a selective basis to each soldier who distinguishes him or herself from among their fellow soldiers by their exemplary conduct, efficiency, and fidelity throughout their service. There is no right or entitlement to the medal until the immediate commander has approved the award and the award has been announced in permanent orders. Separation transfer points will review records of enlisted personnel being separated to determine whether they qualify for award of the GCMDL. Where possible, a reasonable effort will be made to contact the unit commander prior to awarding the medal to qualified members.

CONCLUSIONS:

1. Although there is no evidence in the available records to show that he was awarded the ASI of “R3” for nuclear security, it is reasonable to presume that he completed the necessary OJT for nuclear security, given his assignment as a special weapons assembler, his participation in the Nuclear Surety Program (PRP) and his being placed on travel and assignment restrictions.

2. Accordingly, it would be in the interest of justice to correct his records to add the ASI of “R3” to his MOS at this time.

3. The Board also notes that the applicant had excellent conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his service and his records contain no derogatory information that would serve to disqualify him for award of the GCMDL. Therefore, it must be presumed that the failure to award him the GCMDL was the result of an administrative error. Accordingly, it would be in the interest of justice to award him the GCMDL for the period of 11 February 1971 to 1 December 1972.

4. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.









RECOMMENDATION: That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned possessed the MOS of 13A10M5R3 and by awarding him the GCMDL for the period of 11 February 1971 to 1 December 1972.

BOARD VOTE:

___fe ___ __slp____ ___eja __ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION




                  _____Fred N. Eichorn_______
                  CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID AR2002073824
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 2002/10/22
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION GRANT
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 6 100.0500/ADD ASI
2. 102 107.0056/GCMDL
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082331C070215

    Original file (2002082331C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    He had served 2 years of total active service and his DD Form 214 indicates that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Combat Infantryman Badge, the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal. The regulation outlines the criteria for award of the Good Conduct Medal (GCMDL) and provides, in pertinent part, that the GCMDL is awarded for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and fidelity in active Federal military service. RECOMMENDATION : That all of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074769C070403

    Original file (2002074769C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s military records show that he enlisted in Newark, New Jersey, on 22 August 1966, for a period of 3 years and training as a clerk typist. The regulation outlines the criteria for award of the Good Conduct Medal (GCMDL) and provides, in pertinent part, that the GCMDL is awarded for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and fidelity in active Federal military service. Additionally, there is no evidence in the available records to show that he was recommended for or is entitled to an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002105C070206

    Original file (20050002105C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, absent more conclusive and specific evidence to show that he was wounded as a result of enemy action and that the treatment was made a matter of record, there appears to be no basis to award him the Purple Heart at this time. The applicant has also failed to show through evidence submitted with his application or the evidence of record that he ever held the MOS of an infantryman or that he was ever assigned to an infantry unit that engaged the enemy in combat in that capacity. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004100604C070208

    Original file (2004100604C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    He had served 1 year and 14 days of total active service and his DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD shows that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal and the CIB. The evidence also shows that the applicant had excellent conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his service and his records contain no derogatory information that would serve to disqualify him for award of the GCMDL. As a result, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050011209C070206

    Original file (20050011209C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that he was awarded the Purple Heart for wounds received in Vietnam and he is receiving 10% disability from the Department of Veterans Affairs; however, the award of the Purple Heart is not listed on his Report of Transfer or Discharge (DD Form 214). The regulation also states, in pertinent part, that for first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950, a period of service of less than 3 years but more than 1 year qualifies for award of the GCMDL....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004100203C070208

    Original file (2004100203C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error which occurred on 19 February 1971. The evidence of record as well as the evidence submitted by the applicant with his application fails to show that the applicant was wounded in action against the enemy on or about 10 July 1970. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the GCMDL for the period of 20 February 1969 to 19 February 1971, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018776

    Original file (20100018776.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states a bronze service star is worn on the appropriate service medal, to include the Vietnam Service Medal, for each credited campaign participation. After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, it appears that the applicant should have received the AGCM for his service from 7 May 1969 through 4 April 1971. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005103

    Original file (20080005103.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    While the applicant was an infantryman assigned to an infantry company in Vietnam, that alone does not entitle him to award of the CIB. However, after carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, it was determined that the applicant should have received the GCMDL for his service from 28 August 1969 through 3 April 1971. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the GCMDL for the period of 28...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072881C070403

    Original file (2002072881C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board considered the following evidence: It states, in pertinent part, that the Enlistment Bonus is an enlistment incentive offered to those enlisting in the Regular Army for duty in a specific MOS. Army Regulation 601-280 sets forth the basic authority for the Army Enlistment Program for all military personnel of the Active Army.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090955C070212

    Original file (2003090955C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his report of separation (DD Form 214) be corrected to show his awards of the Purple Heart, the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB), the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM), and two bronze service stars to denote his campaign participation. The applicant states, in effect, that he was awarded the Purple Heart, the CIB, the AGCM and two bronze service stars; however, they were not included on his DD Form 214 at the time of his release from active duty (REFRAD). There is...