| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Walter Avery, Jr. | Analyst |
| M. Raymond J. Wagner | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Roger W. Able | Member | |
| Mr. John T. Meixell | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his discharge be upgraded to a general discharge under honorable conditions.
APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that at the time of separation he was young and unwise. As a man today this separation is still a burden. He is now a youth pastor.
He submits no evidence to support his request, but notes that his medical records are located in St. Louis, Missouri.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
He enlisted in the Army National Guard on 12 August 1977 and was involuntarily ordered to active duty on 13 February 1978. At the time of the involuntary call to active duty, he was 20 years old and had 11 years of education.
On 14 March 1979, a Charge Sheet was prepared charging the applicant with absent without leave from 18 February 1978 through 6 July 1978 and 15 July 1978 through 2 March 1979.
On 15 March 1979, the applicant underwent a mental status evaluation and was found mentally capable of understanding and participating in separation proceedings.
Also, on 15 March 1979, the applicant completed a separation physical examination for the purpose of a chapter 10 discharge. He was found qualified for separation.
On 16 March 1979, after consulting with legal counsel, the applicant submitted a request for discharge for the good of the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Enlisted Personnel) chapter 10. He indicated in the request that he understood that if his request was accepted he could be discharged under other than honorable conditions and furnished an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. He indicated that he also understood that as a result of the issuance of such a discharge, he might be deprived of many or all Army, Veterans Administration; and Federal and State benefits. He understood that he might encounter substantial prejudice in civilian life because of an Under Other Than Honorable Discharge. He acknowledged by his signature that he had consulted with counsel who had fully advised him in this matter. The applicant declined to submit a statement on his own behalf.
On 27 March 1979, the Personnel Control Facility Commander, where the applicant was then assigned, recommended approval of the applicant's request for separation and further recommended that he be provided an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions Discharge Certificate.
On 29 March 1979, the appropriate authorities approved the request for discharge and directed the applicant be reduced to the lowest enlisted grade and receive an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions Discharge Certificate.
A DD Form 214, Report of Separation From Active Duty, signed by the applicant, reflects that on 6 April 1979, he was discharged in pay grade E-1. On the date of his separation, he had completed 1 month and 18 days active Federal service and had 371 days lost time. His character of service was Under Other Than Honorable Conditions.
A review of the applicant's medical records found no information to cast doubt on the chapter 10 proceedings.
Army Regulation 635-200, in effect at the time, sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individual’s admission of guilt. A discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The applicant states he was young and unwise and implies this led to an inability to perform military service. This contention is not supported by any evidence submitted by him, or contained in records available to the Board.
2. The Board noted that at time the applicant was 20 years of age, that he submitted no statement on his own behalf at the time he underwent the separation board proceedings. The Board found no evidence that the applicant was any less mature than other soldiers of the same age who successfully
completed military service. It is also noted that again the applicant provides no explanation of the circumstances that led to his separation; nor does he provide any evidence of post service achievement. The applicant questions the wisdom of accepting the chapter 10 discharge. The applicant requested and accepted a chapter 10 separation discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial, a possible conviction and imprisonment. In light of the circumstances the acceptance of the chapter 10 separation may have been a wise decision.
3. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
4. The applicant’s voluntary request for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service to avoid trial by court-martial, was administratively correct and in conformance with applicable regulations. There is no indication that the request was made under coercion or duress.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
___rjw____ ____rwa ___jtm __ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
______ __ _______ _________ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2002073812 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20021010 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | UOTHC |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR 625-200, ch 10 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | A70.00 |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 110.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017719
His military records includes a bar to reenlistment certificate that shows he was counseled on several occasions for infractions that include being absent from duty, sleeping on duty, failing to get a haircut, and smoking in the motor pool. The record does contain a DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) that identifies the authority for his separation as Army Regulation 635-200 (Separations Enlisted Personnel), paragraph 14-33b by reason of misconduct-frequent...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012217
On 21 February 1979, the applicant voluntarily requested discharge for the good of the Service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Enlisted Personnel), Chapter 10 (Discharge in Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial). The applicant also understood that if his request for discharge was accepted, he may be discharged under other than honorable conditions and furnished an Under Other Than Honorable Discharge Certificate. This officer stated, in pertinent part, that the applicant stated...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014349
He acknowledged he understood that, if his request for discharge was accepted, he could be discharged under other than honorable conditions and furnished an Under Other Than Honorable Discharge Certificate. The applicant's commander stated the applicant had surrendered to military authorities; however, in view of his personal conduct, his attitude toward military life, and his lack of rehabilitative potential, he recommended the applicant's request for discharge under the provision of Army...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003898
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. His DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) shows he was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service - in lieu of trial by court-martial, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. __________x_____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014931
The applicant requests his under other than honorable conditions discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. He acknowledged he understood that he could request discharge for the good of the Service because court-martial charges had been preferred against him under the UCMJ which authorized the imposition of a bad-conduct or dishonorable discharge. His full separation packet was not available for review in this case; however, his record does contain a DD Form 214 which shows he was...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028346
The applicant requests his under other than honorable conditions discharge be upgraded to a general discharge. On 21 February 1979, court-martial charges were preferred against him for one specification of being AWOL from 2 December 1978 to 15 February 1979. His DD Form 214 shows he was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service - in lieu of a court-martial, with a character of service of under other than honorable conditions.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011809
The applicant requests upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions discharge to an honorable discharge. On 6 March 1979, the separation authority approved the applicant's request for discharge and directed that he receive an under other than honorable conditions discharge. There is no indication that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board's 15-year statute of limitations.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012272
He understood if his request were accepted he could receive a discharge under other than honorable conditions and that by submitting his request he was admitting he was guilty of the charge against him. Although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, a discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate. c. Paragraph 3-7b provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001392
The applicant requests an upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions discharge. In his request for discharge, he acknowledged he understood if the discharge request were approved, he might be discharged under other than honorable conditions and be furnished an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions Discharge Certificate. There is no evidence he applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board's 15-year statute of limitations.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008064
The applicant requests reconsideration of the Board's denial of his previous request for an upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions discharge to an honorable discharge or at least a general discharge. On 9 January 1979, he consulted with legal counsel and he was advised of the basis for the contemplated trial by court-martial; the effects of an under other than honorable conditions discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted...