| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mrs. Carolyn G. Wade | Analyst |
| Mr. Fred N. Eichorn | Chairperson | |
| Mr. James E. Anderholm | Member | |
| Ms. Charmane Collins | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his undesirable discharge (UD) be upgraded to a general discharge (GD).
APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that he was subjected to racial prejudice and blatant discrimination while he was in the military; that this prejudice impaired his ability to cope with the pressures of military life; and that because of the prejudice and his inability to cope, he started using marijuana. He states that during his period of absence without leave (AWOL), he started to abuse heroin to help him cope with the stress of being AWOL. The applicant states that, if all things were equal in the Army, none of his misconduct would have happened and if he could do it all over, he would certainly do it differently. He concludes that, based upon the pain and suffering he endured, he believes that his UD should be upgraded to a GD.
He submits a two-page statement, dated 30 April 2002, in support of his application.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
He was inducted in the Army of the United States on 10 October 1967 for a period of 2 years. On 23 October 1967, he was assigned to Fort Ord, California, for basic combat training. On 6 February 1968, the applicant accepted nonjudicial punishment (NJP) under the provisions of Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice, for being AWOL from 2-4 February 1968. His punishment consisted of 7 days' correctional custody and forfeiture of $20.00 pay per month for 1 month. Following completion of advanced individual training, the applicant was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 64A, Light Vehicle Driver.
On 1 April 1968, the applicant departed his unit AWOL and remained absent until 13 May 1968. On 22 May 1968, he was convicted by a summary court-martial for this period of AWOL. He was sentenced to confinement at hard labor for 30 days, forfeiture of $40.00 pay per month for 1 month, and reduction to private/E-1. The sentence was approved on 22 May 1968. The applicant was confined from 22 May 1968 to 14 June 1968. On 15 June 1968, the applicant returned to duty.
On 21 October 1968, the applicant was convicted by a special court-martial for one specification of willfully disobeying a lawful command from a superior officer and one specification of sleeping in the cab of his truck during duty hours. He was sentenced to confinement at hard labor for 1 month, forfeiture of $46.00 pay per month for 3 months, and reduction to private/E-1. The sentence was approved on 21 October 1968. The applicant was confined from 21 October to 14 November 1968.
On 20 November 1968, the applicant was assigned to Headquarters Company, United States Army Training Center, Infantry, Fort Ord, California, where he received excellent conduct and efficiency ratings.
The applicant was AWOL from 1-19 January 1969. The applicant was again AWOL from 28 February 1969 to 12 April 1970. The applicant was returned to duty on 13 April 1970 and was assigned to the Special Processing Detachment at Fort Ord.
On 21 June 1970, the unit commander notified the applicant of his intention to recommend him for discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation (AR) 635-206 by reason of misconduct - desertion. He was advised of his rights.
On 23 June 1970, counsel from the Judge Advocate General Corps (JAGC) advised the applicant of his rights. The applicant waived his rights to a board of officers hearing and elected not to submit a statement in his own behalf.
On 6 July 1970, the applicant was referred for psychiatric clearance integral to administrative processing according to AR 635-206. He was found to have a dyssocial personality with drug abuse; however, there was no evidence of mental disease, defect, or derangement. He was psychiatrically cleared for separation from the service under the provisions of the appropriate administrative regulation. On 10 July 1970, a medical examination found the applicant fit for separation.
On 3 August 1970, the appropriate authority approved the applicant's discharge with a UD. Accordingly, on 27 August 1970, the applicant was discharged from the Army after completing 1 year, 4 months, and 3 days of creditable military service and accruing 530 days of lost time.
AR 635-206, then in effect, provided in pertinent part for the administrative separation of enlisted personnel who had committed an act or acts of misconduct by reason of fraudulent entry in the service, conviction by civil court, and absence without leave or desertion.
On 4 April 1985, the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) denied the applicant's request for an upgrade of his discharge.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
2. The evidence of record does not support the applicant’s contention that he was a victim of racial discrimination and that his chain of command did not address it; and he has not provided any evidence to support his contention. Even if the applicant was experiencing racial discrimination, the Board noted that he had many legitimate avenues through which to obtain assistance or relief, without abusing drugs or going AWOL.
3. The Board carefully reviewed the applicant’s record of service and concluded that his discharge was appropriate because the quality of his service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel. Additionally, the applicant provided no independent corroborating evidence demonstrating that either the command's action was erroneous or that his service mitigated his misconduct or poor duty performance. The applicant’s misconduct, to include abusing drugs and going AWOL, diminished the quality of his service below that meriting a fully honorable or general discharge.
4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__fne___ __jea___ __cc____ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2002073674 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20021203 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | UD |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 19700827 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR 635-206 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | A60.00 |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 144.9405 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016054
There is no evidence that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. There is no evidence of record which shows the applicant was a victim of racial discrimination.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001051836C070420
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded: The applicant’s SPCM conviction and the resultant BCD were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations in effect at the time.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077240C070215
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 2 May 1973, the commander at the USARB requested that the applicant be processed for separation under the provisions of chapter 13, Army Regulation 635-200. The USARB was established in 1968 as the U.S. Army Correctional Training Facility (CTF).
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065124C070421
On 18 February 1970, the appropriate authority approved the applicant’s separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-206, by reason of misconduct-civil conviction by a civil court with confinement in excess of 1 year, and he directed that the applicant receive an UD discharge. The Board notes the applicant’s contentions that at the time of his discharge, he believed the Army was separating him for medical reasons, that his difficult childhood and his abuse of alcohol and drugs...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019319
On 6 August 1970, the applicant's company commander recommended the applicant be discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-206 for a civil conviction with an undesirable discharge. The regulation stated in: a. Paragraph 3-7a - an honorable discharge was a separation with honor. The applicant's record shows he was discharged in accordance with Army Regulation 635-206 for misconduct-conviction by civil authorities.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010028
While AWOL from Fort Ord, he was arrested and then convicted of robbery (2nd Class Felony) and sentenced to 5 years confinement. On 4 January 1978, the Army Discharge Review Board, under the Special Discharge Review Program (SDRP), denied the applicant's petition for an upgrade of his discharge. The U.S. Court of Appeals, observing that applicants to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) are by statute allowed 15 years to apply there, and that this Board's exhaustion requirement (Army...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040006868C070208
The applicant requests that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a general, honorable or medical discharge. Army Regulation 635-206, in effect at that time, set forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel for conviction by civil court. Evidence of record shows that during the applicant's military service he received one special court-martial, was confined by military and civilian authorities, was charged and convicted of second degree burglary, and of violating...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000659
The evidence of record shows that punishment was imposed against the applicant under Article 15, UCMJ, on 4 occasions while he was stationed at Fort Ord, California, and on all 4 of those occasions the applicant failed to offer evidence in matters of extenuation, mitigation, or defense. The evidence of record also shows that, during this period, non-judicial punishment was imposed against the applicant under Article 15, UCMJ, on 5 separate occasions. The evidence of record also shows the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078900C070215
EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: On 26 February 1970, the applicant was discharged accordingly. The separation document (DD Form 214) that was issued to the applicant on the date of his discharge, 26 February 1970, shows that he received an UD under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-206 for unfitness, by reason of civil conviction.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009893
On 22 January 1971, the separation authority approved the applicants request for discharge and directed that he be furnished an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. The evidence of record shows the applicant was discharged with an undesirable discharge on 28 January 1971. Evidence of record shows he was awarded a clemency discharge in 1975 pursuant to PP 4313 of 16 September 1974.