| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. William Blakely | Analyst |
| Mr. Elzey J. Arledge, Jr. | Chairperson | ||
| Mr. Thomas B. Redfern, III | Member | ||
| Ms. Karen A. Heinz | Member |
2. The applicant requests, in effect that he be awarded the Purple Heart (PH).
3. The applicant states, in effect, that on 2 March 1991, he was wounded while serving during Operation Desert Storm. In support of his application, he submits a copy of his separation document (DD Form 214), an Inpatient Treatment Record Cover Sheet (DA Form 3647), a Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings (DA Form 199), and two memoranda from members of his chain of command during Operation Desert Strom, dated 18 July 1997 and 17 November 1998.
4. The applicant’s military records show that on 30 January 2002, he was medically retired with a disability rating of 30 percent, after completing a total of 15 years, 5 months, and 25 days of active military service.
5. The DD Form 214, issued to and signed by the applicant on the date of his separation, confirms that at the time of his separation he held the rank of sergeant first class/E-7, and that he was serving in military occupational specialty (MOS) was 12B (Combat Engineer). It also shows that he served in Southwest Asia from 1 October 1990 to 18 March 1991, and that he earned the following awards during his active duty tenure: Army Commendation Medal (2nd Award); Army Achievement Medal (6th Award); Army Good Conduct Medal (5th Award); National Defense Service Medal; Southwest Asia Service Medal with 2 bronze service stars; Kuwait Liberation Medal (SA); and Kuwait Liberation Medal (KU).
6. The applicant provided a DA Form 3647, dated 15 March 1991, which confirms that he received medical treatment for shrapnel wounds to his left leg and back. It also shows that he was injured by a friendly detonator that was being used to clear an artillery section in Iraq on 2 March 1971.
7. The memorandum dated 18 July 1997, was written by a company commander at Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri, who was the applicant’s platoon leader during Operation Desert Storm. It indicates that the applicant was wounded while destroying enemy munitions in support of Operation Desert Storm, and it requested the assistance of the Inspector General in pursuing the award of the PH to the applicant. The 17 November 1998 memorandum provided by the applicant contains the approval recommendation of the applicant’s brigade commander to the Total Army Personnel Commander (PERSCOM) and indicated that the applicant met the criteria for award of the PH.
8. During the processing of this case, an official from the PERSCOM Awards Branch was contacted by a member of the Board staff to ascertain if a recommendation for award of the PH was ever acted upon by PERSCOM. The PERSCOM awards official confirmed that their data base shows an approved award of the PH on the applicant. However, their files contain no documentation to show the award was submitted or approval, and contains no orders awarding the applicant the PH.
9. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes Army policy, criteria, and administrative instructions concerning individual military awards. Paragraph 2-8 contains the regulatory guidance pertaining to awarding the PH. It states, in pertinent part, that the PH is awarded to any member wounded or killed while engaged in action against an armed enemy or hostile force. A wound is defined as an injury to any part of the body from an outside force or agent while engaged in action against the enemy. It further provides for the award of the PH in cases of friendly fire under certain circumstances.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The Board notes the applicant’s contention that he is entitled to receive the PH for wounds he received in action, and it finds sufficient evidence to support this claim.
2. By regulation, the PH is authorized for personnel who are wounded by friendly fire under certain circumstances if there is evidence to show that the wound for which the award was being made was treated by military medical personnel, and that this treatment was made a matter of official record.
3. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant was wounded in action on 2 March 1991, while serving in Iraq during Operation Desert Storm, and as a result, he was treated by military medical personnel for shrapnel wounds to his left leg and back. Further, there is evidence that this award was recommended by the chain of command and approved by PERSCOM; however, the documentation was lost and orders were never published. Therefore, the Board concludes that the applicant is entitled to the PH and it would be appropriate to award it to him and add it to his record at this time.
4. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding the applicant the Purple Heart for being wounded in action on
2 March 1991, while serving as a staff sergeant in Iraq during Operation Desert Storm.
BOARD VOTE:
__EJA__ __TBR___ ___KAH__ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
___Elzey J. Arledge, Jr. _
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2002073619 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 2002/09/17 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 107.0015 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090067C070212
On 3 October 2002, a National Service Officer of the DVA provided a letter that supports the applicant’s claim that he received his back injury while engaged in action against the enemy. However, none of the medical treatment records pertaining to this injury contain any indication that the injury was caused by or related to enemy action. Thus, the Board finds insufficient evidence to support the applicant’s claim of entitlement to the PH, and it is regrettably compelled to deny the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009633
It stated that "division commanders in the grade of major general who had troops committed to the combat operation and hospital commanders receiving casualties could award the Purple Heart to Soldiers who were wounded as the direct result, repeat, direct result of enemy action." There is no evidence in the record and the applicant has provided no evidence to show that a Scud missile actually exploded anywhere near the King Abdul Aziz Hospital. In the absence of conclusive evidence that...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002335
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show in: * Item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) the: * Kuwait Liberation Medal (Saudi Arabia) * Kuwait Liberation Medal (Kuwait) * Combat Infantryman Badge * Army Good Conduct Medal (2nd Award) * Purple Heart * Two awards of the Army Achievement Medal * Two awards of the Overseas Service Ribbon * Item 14 (Military Education) -...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020827
The applicant states: * he was actively engaged in ground combat and met the criteria for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge * his unit was actively engaged in ground warfare against the Iraq forces during Operation Desert Storm in 1991 * he served in an imminent danger pay area which is reflected on his DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record-Part II) * he was assigned to an infantry unit during Operation Desert Storm and he mailed his family letters using this address * a book was...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011887
He argues that the award of the Valorous Unit Award (VUA) is evidence that his unit was in combat and that he should qualify for award of the CIB because he performed infantryman duties in combat. There was no evidence in the applicant's records and he had not provided any evidence showing he was wounded or injured in action. However, there is no evidence showing that the applicant was ever awarded an infantryman MOS, or that he had performed such duties while in Iraq.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005326
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of the Purple Heart. It stated that "division commanders in the grade of major general who had troops committed to the combat operation and hospital commanders receiving casualties could award the Purple Heart to Soldiers who were wounded as the direct result, repeat, direct result of enemy action." In the absence of conclusive evidence that shows he was wounded or...
A complete copy of the Record of Proceedings is at Exhibit F. In a letter to his Senator dated 23 July 1997, the applicant provided a witness' statement from his supervisor at the time and asked that he be awarded the PH. In a combat support role, applicant was wounded as a result of enemy action. On 7 December 1994, the PH Review Board denied his request for the award, stating that the documentation furnished on his behalf, in accordance with established criteria, did not...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019506
There are no general orders that show the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart and there is no evidence in his service personnel records that shows that he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action or treated for such wounds. In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. __________X_____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010906
His unit, the 660th Transportation Company, was awarded an Exceptional Meritorious Citation. They should have gotten an Army Commendation Medal or a Meritorious Service Medal for their actions. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. While the available evidence is insufficient for awarding the applicant another Army Commendation Medal or a Bronze...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020196
It states in order to support award of the PH there must be evidence confirming the wound for which the awards is being made was received as a result of enemy action; that it required treatment by military medical personnel; and a record of this treatment must have made a matter of official record. However, by regulation, in order to support award of the PH there must be evidence that the wound or injury for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action. Further,...