Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073600C070403
Original file (2002073600C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 27 August 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002073600


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Edmund P. Mercanti Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. Irene N. Wheelwright Chairperson
Mr. Arthur A. Omartian Member
Mr. Thomas Lanyi Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
                  records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
                  advisory opinion, if any)

APPLICANT REQUESTS: Reconsideration of his earlier appeal to correct his military records by awarding him the Purple Heart (PH).

APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that when a soldier is a prisoner of war (POW) for many months as he was, and was placed in solitary confinement more than once, it is reasonable to believe that there would be beatings of that prisoner.

NEW EVIDENCE OR INFORMATION: Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in a memorandum prepared to reflect the Board's previous consideration of the case (AR2001064458) on 28 February 2002.

In support of his request for reconsideration the applicant submits a Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) medical assessment, dated 25 August 1987, which indicates that the applicant suffered a "Blow to right side of neck and right shoulder from rifle butt World War II in prisoner of war camp Germany." He was said to suffer from osteoarthrosis of his right shoulder and cervical spine secondary to trauma of rifle butt blow in WWII.

Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for wounds sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by a medical officer, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

During World War II, the Purple Heart was not awarded to soldiers who had been injured while in captivity as a result of enemy maltreatment or brutality. These injuries were considered to be the result of war crimes and not the result of a legal action of war. War Department policy, at that time, required that wounds must have been received in action against the enemy or, in other words, incurred in actual combat. Executive Order 11016, dated 25 April 1962, provided more latitude with respect to award of the Purple Heart to prisoners of war, as well as the authority to award the decoration to wounded soldiers even in the absence of a formal declaration of war. The issue as to whether this change in policy would be implemented retroactively to prisoners of war from World War I, World War II, and the Korean War has been considered several times. However, it was decided that the change in policy would not be retroactively implemented. It was concluded that it would be inappropriate for the Department of Defense to retroactively change the standards and, in effect, countermand the decisions of the past leadership. However, as part of the National Defense Authorization Act of 1996 Congress authorized award of the Purple Heart to any former POW who was wounded before 25 April 1962 while held as a POW, or while being taken captive, in the same manner as a former POW who was wounded on or after that date.

The DVA assessment is new evidence that requires Board consideration.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, and applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. While the DVA had recorded that it had received information that the applicant was hit by a rifle butt in his neck and shoulder while a POW, the DVA did not state where it derived that information. That information very well may have been based solely on a history provided by the applicant, himself.

2. Without documentary evidence to show that the applicant was wounded while a POW, he is not entitled to the PH.

3. The applicant's contention that a soldier who is a POW for a prolonged period must be presumed to have been wounded by his captors is not in keeping with the regulatory requirements for award of the PH or the National Defense Authorization Act of 1996.

4. The overall merits of the case, including the latest submissions and arguments are insufficient as a basis for the Board to reverse its previous decision.

5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.


BOARD VOTE
:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__inw____ ___aao _ ___tl____ DENY APPLICATION



         Carl W. S. Chun

Director, Army Board for Correction
         of Military Records



INDEX

CASE ID AR2002073600
SUFFIX
RECON AR2001064458
DATE BOARDED 20020827
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 107.00
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.



Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057598C070420

    Original file (2001057598C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, as part of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) of 1996 Congress authorized award of the Purple Heart to any former prisoner of war who was wounded before 25 April 1962 while held as a prisoner of war, or while being taken captive, in the same manner as a former prisoner of war who was wounded on or after that date. There is no available evidence of record to show that the applicant was wounded at the time of his capture or while he was in captivity. Therefore, correction...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011580

    Original file (20090011580.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant's military records are not available to the Board for review. The WD AGO Form 38, dated 27 November 1945, is the only available evidence of record that discusses the applicant’s medical condition at the time.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012880C071029

    Original file (20060012880C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. The applicant's National Personnel Records Center (NPRC) file contains no documents indicating the applicant was wounded at the time he was taken as a POW, or evidence that he was wounded or injured while a POW. The evidence of record confirms that as a result of the 1996 NDAA, POWs during World War II were authorized to receive the PH if they had been wounded while being taken prisoner or while in captivity.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 040006358C070208

    Original file (040006358C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. Although legislation did authorize award of the Purple Heart to former prisoners of war, as indicated above, there must be substantiating evidence to show that a POW was wounded as a result of hostile action. The evidence shows that the applicant’s record contains administrative error that does not require action by the Board.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00533

    Original file (BC-2003-00533.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The AFPC/DPPPR evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He did suffer the atrocity of beatings to his lower back while a POW at Stalag Luft IV and the DVA has determined his lower back condition is service-connected for the injury received while a POW. _________________________________________________________________ RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD: A majority of the Board finds...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003165

    Original file (20090003165.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 33 (Decorations and Citations) of the applicant's WD AGO Form 53-55 shows he earned the following awards during his active duty tenure: EAME Campaign Medal, Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM), WWII Victory Medal, and American Theater Ribbon. The evidence also confirms that based on being held as a POW during WWII from 16 December 1944 through 2 April 1945, the applicant is eligible for the POW Medal, which should also be awarded and added to his reconstructed record and WD AGO Form 53-55...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084695C070212

    Original file (2003084695C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The FSM’s military records were not available to the Board for review. However, the Board does find the information provided in the OTSG admission record, coupled with the VA medical documents provided by counsel are sufficiently credible to support the FSM’s entitlement to the PH, when coupled with the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025445

    Original file (20100025445.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A Medical Board Proceedings, dated 14 December 1943, shows the applicant was admitted to the 3rd General Hospital on 24 November 1943 from the 118th Station Hospital. The commander didn't come and he was taken to an Italian hospital. Therefore, it would appropriate to correct his records to show he was a POW from 10 to 16 July 1943 in Italy and award him the POW Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040000162C070208

    Original file (20040000162C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 27 (Decorations, Medal, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized), of the applicant's DD Form 214, with an effective date of 8 December 1953, shows that he was awarded the Army of Occupation Medal, with Japan Clasp; the Korean Service Medal, with one bronze service star; and the United Nations Service Medal. Once the Department of the Air Force has authorized the Korean War Service Medal, the applicant may apply to the Army Board for Correction of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001054674C070420

    Original file (2001054674C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his military records be corrected to reflect award of the Purple Heart and POW (Prisoner of War) Medal. While the evidence clearly confirms the applicant was a POW and as such is entitled to the POW Medal there is insufficient evidence to confirm the applicant was wounded as a result of hostile action during the Korean War. The applicant admits that there is no medical evidence to substantiate his shrapnel wound and the statements submitted in support of his...