| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Wanda L. Waller | Analyst |
| Ms. Joann Langston | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Raymond V. O’Connor | Member | |
| Ms. Barbara J. Lutz | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that clemency in the form of an honorable discharge be granted.
APPLICANT STATES: The applicant did not provide an explanation. In support of his application, the applicant submits five character reference letters.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 3 August 1960 for a period of
3 years. On 18 August 1961, the applicant was released from military control by virtue of a void enlistment for being underage. He enlisted in the South Carolina Army National Guard on 15 March 1962 for a period of 3 years. The applicant was ordered to active duty for training on 5 April 1962 and was released from active duty on 4 October 1962 to complete his remaining obligation in the South Carolina Army National Guard. On 16 November 1962, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army for a period of 3 years. He was honorably discharged on
1 June 1964 for immediate reenlistment. The applicant reenlisted on 2 June 1964 for a period of 6 years.
On 14 January 1965, the applicant was convicted consistent with his plea by a special court-martial of being absent without leave (AWOL) from 31 July 1964 to 16 November 1964 and from 10 December 1964 to 13 December 1964. He was sentenced to be reduced to E-1 and confined at hard labor for 6 months. On
18 January 1965, the convening authority approved the sentence. On 2 March 1965, the unexecuted portion of the sentence to confinement at hard labor for
6 months was suspended for 5 months. On 20 August 1965, the suspended portion of the sentence to confinement was vacated.
On 9 September 1965, the applicant was convicted consistent with his plea by a general court-martial of one period of AWOL (from 29 March 1965 to 22 July 1965) which was terminated by apprehension. He was sentenced to be dishonorably discharged, to forfeit all pay and allowances and to be confined at hard labor for 6 months. On 23 September 1965, the convening authority approved only so much of the sentence as provides for a bad conduct discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and confinement at hard labor for 6 months.
Headquarters Fort Jackson General Court-Martial Order Number 37, dated
19 October 1976, indicates that the sentence was affirmed, the bad conduct discharge was ordered executed, but the unexecuted portion of the sentence pertaining to confinement at hard labor was remitted effective 27 October 1965.
Accordingly, the applicant was discharged with a Bad Conduct Discharge Certificate on 27 October 1965 under the provisions of Army Regulation
635-204, for conviction by a general court-martial. He had served 2 years,
7 months and 14 days of total active service with 369 days lost due to AWOL and confinement.
Army Regulation 635-204, in effect at that time, set forth the basic authority for separation of enlisted personnel with dishonorable and bad conduct discharges. Paragraph 1b of this regulation states that an enlisted person will be discharged with a bad conduct discharge pursuant only to an approved sentence of a general or special court-martial imposing a bad conduct discharge.
Section 1552(f), Title 10, United States Code states that the ABCMR can only review records of court-martial and related administrative records to correct a record to accurately reflect action taken by reviewing authorities under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) or to take clemency action.
Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7, provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law. The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the member’s service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel (emphasis added), or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The Board considered the character reference letters provided in support of the applicant’s claim. However, good post service conduct alone is not a basis for upgrading a discharge.
2. The applicant’s administrative separation was accomplished in compliance with applicable regulations.
3. The applicant has failed to show through the evidence submitted with his application or the evidence of record that the actions taken in his case were in error or unjust.
4. The Board reviewed the applicant’s record of service which included one special court-martial conviction and one general court-martial conviction for a 115-day AWOL period which was terminated by apprehension and determined that his quality of service did not meet the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel. Therefore, the Board determined that clemency in the form of an honorable discharge was not warranted in this case.
5. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
6. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
JL_____ RVO_____ BJL_____ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2002073427 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20020822 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (BCD) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 19651027 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR 635-204 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | Conviction by a general court-martial |
| BOARD DECISION | (DENY) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 110.0200 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000258C070206
Accordingly, the applicant was discharged with a bad conduct discharge on 14 July 1965 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-204, for conviction by a general court-martial. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged injustice now under consideration on 14 July 1965; therefore, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004100396C070208
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 12 August 2004 DOCKET NUMBER: AR2004100396 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Records show that remission of the sentence of the General Court-Martial resulted in a discharge date effective on or about 8 May 1965. Conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9606163C070209
APPLICANT STATES: That he was not notified of his sisters death and when he later found out about it, he went AWOL. EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show: He was inducted on 15 August 1962 and was discharged with a BCD pursuant to the sentence of a general court-martial (GCM) on 6 February 1965. In March 1963, he was also convicted by a summary court-martial for being AWOL.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015919
On 29 May 1968, the United States Army Board of Review, Office of The Judge Advocate General, reassessed the sentence and approved only so much as provided for a bad conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for 6 months, and forfeiture of $50 pay per month for 6 months. Accordingly, the applicant was discharged with a bad conduct discharge on 16 August 1968 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-204 for conviction by a general court-martial. __William...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007158
On 6 May 1966, the convening authority approved only so much of the sentence as provided for a bad conduct discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, confinement at hard labor for 9 months, and reduction to PV1/E-1; and except for the bad conduct discharge, he ordered the sentence executed and the record of trial be forwarded to The Judge Advocate General of the Army for appellate review. He was discharged from the Army on 28 September 1966. The evidence of record shows he was tried...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018215
The applicant requests, in effect, that his bad conduct discharge be upgraded. Army Regulation 635-204 (Personnel Separations Dishonorable and Bad-Conduct Discharge), in effect at the time, set forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel with dishonorable and bad conduct discharges. Evidence shows that although the applicant enlisted for a 3 year period, he only served 50 days of military service.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002066820C070402
On 28 July 1965, the convening authority approved only so much of the sentence as provides for a dishonorable discharge, confinement at hard labor for 18 months and total forfeitures. Paragraph 1b of this regulation states that an enlisted person will be discharged with a bad conduct discharge pursuant only to an approved sentence of a general or special court-martial imposing a bad conduct discharge. Therefore, the Board determined that there is no basis for upgrading the applicant’s bad...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084737C070212
The convening authority approved the sentence on 28 August; but the execution thereof was suspended until he was released from confinement. This regulation provides that a soldier will be given a dishonorable discharge pursuant only to an approved sentence of a general court-martial empowered to impose a dishonorable discharge. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013106
BOARD DATE: 2 April 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140013106 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. On 4 April 1966, the U.S. Army Court of Military Review affirmed the approved findings of guilty and a modified sentence. His DD Form 214 shows he was discharged as a result of court-martial in accordance with Army Regulation 635-204 (Personnel Separations Dishonorable and Bad Conduct Discharge) with an under other than honorable conditions character of service.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005287
The applicant requests, in effect, upgrade of his bad conduct discharge (BCD) to general, under honorable conditions. The applicants military records show he enlisted in the Regular Army, in pay grade E-1, on 10 August 1964, for 3 years. The Staff Judge Advocate recommended the finding of guilty be approved and found the sentence correct in law.