Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
Mr. G. E. Vandenberg | Analyst |
Mr. Thomas A. Pagan | Chairperson | |
Mr. Roger W. Able | Member | |
Mr. John A. Kelly | Member |
2. The applicant requests that his discharge be upgraded.
3. The applicant states, in effect, that he was young and immature at the time of the offenses. He states that he has matured and realizes that his conduct was inappropriate.
CASE ID | AR2002073389 |
SUFFIX | |
RECON | |
DATE BOARDED | 20030311 |
TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
DISCHARGE REASON | |
BOARD DECISION | GRANT |
REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
ISSUES 1. | 144.26 |
2. | 144.42 Current standards - Nelson/Brotzman |
3. | 144.9301 |
4. | |
5. | |
6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007534
The examiner determined the applicant's condition did not warrant separation from service under the provisions of current medical discharge regulations. The examiner recommended the applicant be separated from the service for unsuitability. The applicant stated that he was not submitting statements in his own behalf and that he waived counsel.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009044
On 10 February 1961, the applicant's commander recommended that the applicant be separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-209, due to unsuitability with a General Discharge Certificate. His service record does not indicate he applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations. His military personnel record does not show he was convicted by a general court-martial or by more than one special court-martial.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005185
The applicant requests his general discharge for the period ending 28 September 1962 be upgraded to an honorable discharge and correction of his records to show he was awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM). Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, required that throughout a qualifying period of service for award of the AGCM the enlisted person must have had all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings and no convictions by a court-martial. As a result, the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000645
The applicant requests an upgrade of his general discharge under honorable conditions to an honorable discharge. The Brotzman Memorandum required that the revised provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 be applied retroactively when reviewing applications for discharge upgrades based on personality disorders. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140000645 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140000645 2 ARMY BOARD...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001108
On 29 November 1957, a psychiatric evaluation was conducted on the applicant and the psychiatrist who performed this examination essentially opined that the applicant was extremely poorly motivated for further military service, that he was not a suitable candidate for rehabilitative efforts, and that he should be presented to a Board of Officers for consideration for separation from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208 (Unfitness - Frequent Incidents of a Discreditable...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004100267C070208
Department of the Army BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 1901 SOUTH BELL STREET 2ND FLOOR ARLINGTON, VA 22202-4508 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: JUNE 29, 2004 DOCKET NUMBER : AR2004100267 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001247
His service record does not indicate he applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations. The Brotzman Memorandum required that the revised provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 be applied retroactively when reviewing applications for upgrade of discharges based on personality disorders. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. issuing him an...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006803
The applicant requests that his general discharge, under honorable conditions be upgraded to an honorable discharge. The applicant provides, in support of his application, three personal references and a copy of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) with an effective date of 25 July 1962. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. voiding the general discharge now...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019153
On 10 April 1965, the separation authority approved the applicant's separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-209 by reason of unsuitability with issuance of a General Discharge Certificate. The applicants service record is void of evidence which supports his contention he was assaulted by a Motor Pool Sergeant while he was on active duty in 1965. The Nelson Memorandum specified that the presence of a personality disorder (character and behavior disorder at the time)...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007358
The ADRB case report also confirms that on 3 August 1964, the unit commander initiated action to discharge the applicant from active duty under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-209 (Personnel Separations - Discharge -Unsuitability), by reason of unsuitability (apathy, defective attitude, and inability to expend effort constructively). However, the Brotzman Memorandum requires that the revised provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 be applied retroactively when reviewing applications for...