| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Lee Cates | Analyst |
| Mr. Luther L. Santiful | Chairperson | |
| Ms. Paula Mokulis | Member | |
| Mr. Donald P. Hupman, Jr. | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: Upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions discharge (UOTHC) to fully honorable.
APPLICANT STATES: That he had served honorably for 2 ½ years.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's available military records show:
On 11 May 1971, the applicant enlisted in the Army. He completed his required training and was awarded military occupational specialty 51N (Water Supply Specialist). He was advanced to pay grade E-4.
On 19 July 1972, he was administered non-judicial punishment (NJP) under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice for being absent without leave (AWOL) for the period 1 June to 13 July 1972. His punishment included a reduction to pay grade E-3 and forfeiture of $100 pay per month for 2 months.
On 22 December 1972, he was administered NJP for being AWOL for the period 27 November to 7 December 1972. His punishment included a reduction to pay grade E-2 (suspended for 90 days) and forfeiture of $150 pay.
On 12 November 1974, a physical examination cleared the applicant for separation.
On 13 November 1974, after his apprehension, the unit commander preferred court-martial charges against him for being absent without leave for the period 13 October 1973 to 6 November 1974.
On 14 November 1974, after consulting with legal counsel, the applicant voluntarily submitted a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10. He acknowledged that he could receive a bad conduct or dishonorable discharge; that he was guilty of the charges against him; that he had consulted with legal counsel; and that he had no desire to perform further military service.
On 20 November 1974, the appropriate separation authority approved his request, directed his reduction to pay grade E-1 and directed an Undesirable Discharge Certificate be issued.
On 25 November 1974, the applicant was discharged, in pay grade E-1, with a discharge under other than honorable conditions, under the above-cited regulation. His records indicate he had 2 years, 7 months and 10 days of creditable service and 441 days of lost time.
Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10 (Discharge for the Good of the Service), then in effect, set forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 provided, in pertinent part, that a member who had committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment included a punitive discharge could at any time after the charges had been preferred, submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. At the time of the applicant’s separation, the regulation provided for the issuance of an Undesirable Discharge Certificate.
Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), paragraph 3-7 provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor. The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the member's service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel, or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be inappropriate.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The applicant chose to request an administrative discharge rather than risk the consequences of a court-martial. Although he may now feel that he made the wrong choice, he should not be allowed to change his mind at this late date.
2. The applicant’s voluntary request for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service to avoid trial by court-martial, was administratively correct and in conformance with applicable regulations. There is no indication that the request was made under coercion or duress.
3. The type of discharge directed and the reasons therefore were appropriate considering all the facts of the case.
4. The Board notes is contention of having served honorably for 2 ½ years; however, his AWOL started 1 year after his enlistment, and his overall service does not mitigate his AWOL and UOTHC.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
_LLS____ __PM__ __DPH___ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2002073308 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20020806 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 144 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004101775C070208
The applicant requests that the undesirable discharge of his deceased son, a former service member (FSM) be upgraded to an honorable discharge. The record of nonjudicial punishment (NJP) is unavailable for review by the Board; however, the record does show that he was reduced in pay grade on 21 March 1972. On 18 November 1975, the Army Discharge Review Board denied the FSM’s request for an upgrade of his discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072055C070403
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The Board considered the following evidence: EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show:
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070007318C071029
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. On 21 May 1974, the applicant was discharged, in pay grade E-1, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service with an undesirable discharge and a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. On 12 October 1981, the Army Discharge Review Board denied the applicant’s request for an upgraded discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004752C070206
The applicant requests, in effect, that all of the blocks on his DD Form 214 be completed and that he be provided an explanation of why he received a discharge under other than honorable conditions. The applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge on 11 January 1974 and that board found that his discharge was both proper and equitable and denied his request on 6 February 1974. That regulation also provided that information blocks contained on the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040009653C070208
Kenneth Lapin | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. There is no evidence in the available records to show that he ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board’s 15-year statute of limitations. ____ John Slone______________ CHAIRPERSON INDEX |CASE ID |AR20040009653 | |SUFFIX | | |RECON |YYYYMMDD | |DATE BOARDED |19740516 | |TYPE OF DISCHARGE |(UD) | |DATE OF...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018091
The applicant requests his under other than honorable conditions discharge be upgraded to a general discharge. In his request for discharge, he acknowledged he understood if the discharge request were approved, he might be discharged under other than honorable conditions and be furnished an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. A review of his record shows he repeatedly went AWOL and he had almost 8 months of lost time due to being AWOL or in confinement at the time of his discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001066187C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The ADRB denied his request on 7 November 1974. Chapter 10 of the regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may at any time after charges have been preferred, submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060005918C070205
The applicant requests that her undesirable discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. There is no evidence in the available records to show that she ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of her discharge within that board’s 15-year statute of limitations. Chapter 10 of the regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may at any time after...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063440C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The Board considered the following evidence: APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a general discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067842C070402
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. He had served 1 year, 8 months and 28 days of total active service and had 97 days of lost time due to AWOL and confinement. A condition of submitting such a request is that the individual concerned must admit guilt to the charges against them or of a lesser included offense which authorizes the imposition of a bad conduct or dishonorable discharge and they must indicate...