| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Jessie B. Strickland | Analyst |
| Mr. Raymond V. O’Connor, Jr. | Chairperson | |
| Ms. Margaret K. Patterson | Member | |
| Mr. Arthur A. Omartian | Member |
2. The applicant requests that his award of the Purple Heart be added to his report of separation (DD Form 214).
3. The applicant states, in effect, that he was injured on 9 January 1967 when he sustained a punji stick wound to the right calf and was medically evacuated to a hospital in Vietnam and then to Japan, where he was awarded the Purple Heart. However, the award of the Purple Heart was never added to his DD Form 214.
4. The applicant’s military records show that he was inducted in Knoxville, Tennessee, on 11 October 1965. He successfully completed his training and was transferred to Vietnam on 25 June 1966, for duty as a light weapons infantryman with C Company, 1st Battalion, 327th Infantry. He was advanced to the pay grade of E-4 on 10 November 1966.
5. On 9 January 1967, he sustained a punji stick wound to the right calf and was medically evacuated to an Air Force hospital in the Philippines (Clark) for surgery and then was transferred to a hospital in Japan (249th General Hospital).
6. On 2 March 1967, General Orders Number 24 was published by the 249th General Hospital, which awarded the applicant the Purple Heart for his wound on 9 January 1967. He remained in Japan until 22 March 1967, when he was transferred to Fort Bragg, North Carolina.
7. He remained at Fort Bragg until he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) on 10 October 1967, due to the expiration of his term of service (ETS). He had served 2 years of total active service and was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge, the Parachutist Badge, the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal, and the National Defense Service Medal. His records also show that he had excellent conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his service and his records contain no derogatory information.
8. Army Regulation 600-8-22 outlines the criteria for award of the Good Conduct Medal (GCMDL). It states, in pertinent part, that the GCMDL is awarded for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and fidelity in active Federal military service. It is awarded on a selective basis to each soldier who distinguishes him or herself from among their fellow soldiers by their exemplary conduct, efficiency, and fidelity throughout their service. There is no right or entitlement to the medal until the immediate commander has approved the award and the award has been announced in permanent orders. Separation transfer points will review records of enlisted personnel being separated to determine whether they qualify for award of the GCMDL. Where possible, a reasonable effort will be made to contact the unit commander prior to awarding the medal to qualified members.
That regulation also provides that a bronze service star will be awarded for participation in each designated campaign.
9. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register-Vietnam Era) was published to assist commanders and personnel officers in determining or establishing the eligibility of individual members for campaign participation credit, assault landing credit, and unit citation badges awarded during the Vietnam Conflict. Table 1 (Army Units in Numerical Order) of the pamphlet indicates that subsequent to the applicant’s departure from Vietnam, his unit was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm (RVNGC w/Palm) Unit Citation and the Meritorious Unit Commendation (MUC) for the period he served with the unit. Additionally, he participated in one campaign during his assignment to Vietnam.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The evidence of record clearly shows that the Purple Heart was awarded to the applicant for his injuries in Vietnam on 9 January 1967. Accordingly, it must be presumed that an administrative oversight resulted in it being omitted from his DD Form 214 at the time of his REFRAD. Accordingly, it would be in the interest of justice to add it at this time.
2. Additionally, the applicant’s unit was subsequently awarded the RVNGC w/Palm Unit Citation and the MUC. Accordingly, he is entitled to be awarded those awards as well and to have his records corrected to reflect those awards.
3. The applicant also participated in one campaign and is authorized to be awarded one bronze service star for wear on his already awarded VSM.
4. The Board also notes that the applicant had excellent conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his service and his records contain no derogatory information that would serve to disqualify him for award of the GCMDL. Therefore, it must be presumed that the failure to award him the GCMDL was the result of an administrative error. Accordingly, it would be in the interest of justice to award him the GCMDL for the period of 11 October 1965 to 10 October 1967.
5. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION: That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned was awarded the Purple Heart and by awarding him the RVNGC w/Palm Unit Citation, the MUC, one bronze service star for wear on his already awarded VSM, and the GCMDL for the period of 11 October 1965 to 10 October 1967.
BOARD VOTE:
___mkp__ ___ao___ ___rvo__ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
__Raymond V. O’Connor, Jr.__
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2002073160 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 2002/10/01 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT PLUS |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 189 | 110.0000/CORR 214 |
| 2. 61 | 107.0015/PH |
| 3. 80 | 107.0034/MUC |
| 4. 102 | 107.0056/GCMDL |
| 5. 140 | 107.0094/RVNGC |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007506
Accordingly, he is entitled to have that award added to his records at this time. After carefully examining the applicants record of service, it appears that the applicant should have received the GCMDL for his service from 7 November 1967 through 3 July 1969. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding his awards of the Purple Heart and The Commanders Unit Commendation to his records and by awarding him...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005231
Paragraph 2-10 of the awards regulation contains guidance on the NDSM and states, in pertinent part, that it is authorized for honorable active service for any period between 1 January 1961 and 14 August 1974. Therefore, it would be appropriate to accept the date provided by the applicant as the most accurate date, and to award him the PH for wounds received as a result of hostile action in the RVN in June 1967; and to add this award to his record and DD Form 214 at this time. As a result,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082331C070215
He had served 2 years of total active service and his DD Form 214 indicates that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Combat Infantryman Badge, the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal. The regulation outlines the criteria for award of the Good Conduct Medal (GCMDL) and provides, in pertinent part, that the GCMDL is awarded for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and fidelity in active Federal military service. RECOMMENDATION : That all of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076776C070215
He had served 2 years of total active service and was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) with four bronze service stars, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal, the National Defense Service Medal, and the Army Commendation Medal. The applicant has failed to show through the evidence submitted with his application or the evidence of record that he was wounded/injured in action against the enemy and that the treatment he received was made a matter of record. Accordingly, the Board has...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050010414C070206
The evidence of record clearly confirms the applicant’s contention that he was awarded the Purple Heart for wounds received in action in Vietnam on 16 May 1968. This conclusion is based on the fact that the record is void of any derogatory information, which would preclude the applicant from being awarded the GCMDL, and the lack of any specific action by the applicant’s unit commander to disqualify him from receiving the award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010523
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart for wounds received while serving in the Republic of Vietnam. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who had completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080001388
The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant was wounded as a result of enemy action on 19 September 1967 in Vietnam and that he was medically evacuated for treatment and he was subsequently retired as a result of permanent physical disability. After carefully examining the applicants record of service, it was determined that the applicant should have received the AGCM for his service from 4 April 1966 through 22 April 1968. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005364
The applicant's military personnel records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 3 November 1965. Therefore, the preponderance of evidence shows the applicant should be awarded the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal based on completion of qualifying service from 3 November 1965 to 27 September 1967 ending with termination of a period of Federal military service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040009556C070208
However, the applicant was a qualified infantryman serving in an infantry unit and as such was awarded the CIB. Based on the available evidence, the applicant was awarded the badge that was most appropriate to his qualifications at the time and there is no basis to grant him an additional award of the CMB that was clearly not authorized. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the GCMDL for the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | AR20050016517C070206
He completed his BCT and was transferred to Fort Lee, Virginia, to undergo his advanced individual training (AIT) as a petroleum storage specialist. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing that he was awarded the Purple Heart and by awarding him the GCMDL for the...