Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072906C070403
Original file (2002072906C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 29 August 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002072906

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. William Blakely Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. Margaret K. Patterson Chairperson
Mr. Christopher J. Prosser Member
Mr. Harry B. Oberg Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his military records be changed to reflect the last name recorded on his birth certificate.

APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that the last name listed on his separation document (DD Form 214) is incorrect and should be corrected to reflect his birth last name, which is recorded on his birth certificate. In support of his application, he submits a copy of his DD Form 214, a correction to his separation document (DD Form 215), and a reproduced copy of his certificate of birth.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

On 4 March 1968, he was inducted into the Army for a period of 2 years. His Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) contains a copy of his Record of Induction (DD Form 47). Item 1 (Name) of this document lists a last name that is different from the last name recorded in the birth certificate he has provided. However, the last name listed on the DA Form 47 is also the last name recorded in his personnel record.

The Personnel Qualification Record (DA Form 2-1) prepared on and authenticated by the applicant with his signature upon his entry on active duty, on 11 March 1968, contains the same last name that was listed in Item 1 of the
DD Form 47.

On 10 October 1969, the applicant was released from active duty (REFRAD), in the rank of private first class/ E-3. The DD Form 214 issued to him on this date shows that he completed a total 1 year, 7 months, and 7 days of active military service. Item 1 (Name) of this document lists the same last name that was recorded on his DD Form 47, the military record prepared on him upon his entry on active duty, and in all other documents prepared and published on him throughout his military service tenure.

Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents that must be prepared for soldiers on retirement, discharge, release from active duty service, or control of the active Army. Chapter 2 contains guidance on the preparation and distribution of the DD Form 214. Paragraph 2-4 contains item by item instructions for completion of the DD Form 214. It states, in pertinent part, that Item 1 will contain the name taken from the soldier’s personnel record.


DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. The Board notes and understands the applicant’s desire to have the last name recorded in his military records changed to the last name recorded in his birth certificate. However, there is no evidence of record or independent evidence that suggests the last name recorded in his military records exhibits a material error or injustice.

2. The Board finds no evidence that suggests that the applicant has suffered or would suffer any injury or injustice as a result of the Army maintaining its records with the last name under which he served. He was inducted, served, and was honorably separated from the Army using the last name recorded in his military records. The fact that now, more than 30 years after the fact, he wishes the last name recorded in his military records changed is not a sufficiently mitigating factor that warrants granting this requested relief.

3. The Army has an interest in maintaining the accuracy of its records. The data and information contained in those records should reflect the conditions and circumstances that existed at the time the records were created. While the Board understands the applicant’s desire to have the last name recorded in his records changed, it finds no compelling reason for compromising the integrity of the Army’s records at this late date.

4. The Board wishes to advise the applicant that a copy of this decisional document along with his application and the supporting evidence he provided, which confirms his birth last name, will be filed in his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). This should serve to clarify any questions or confusion in regard to the difference in his birth last name and the last name recorded in his military records. This should also satisfy his desire to have his birth last name documented in his OMPF.

5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__MKP__ __CJP __ _ _HBO __ DENY APPLICATION




                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records



INDEX

CASE ID AR2002072906
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 2002/08/29
TYPE OF DISCHARGE (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 100.0100
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.



Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074471C070403

    Original file (2002074471C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: Item 1 (Name) of this document listed the middle name the applicant now claims is incorrect, which was consistent with the middle name recorded on his DD Form 47, in his military records, and in all other documents published on him throughout his active duty service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072611C070403

    Original file (2002072611C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: While the Board understands the applicant’s desire to now record his correct last name in the separation documents in question, it finds no evidence that suggests that the applicant has or would suffer any injury or injustice as a result of the Army maintaining these documents as they were correctly prepared at...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013577

    Original file (20090013577.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    BOARD DATE: 14 January 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090013577 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, that the first and middle names recorded in his military records be corrected. However, while the validity of the name he claims is correct is not in question, the record shows he entered, served, and was separated under the first and middle names that are listed on his DD Form 47, DA Form 20, and all documents on file in his OMPF.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014268

    Original file (20090014268.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's DA Form 24 (Service Record) also lists his name as it is listed on the DD Form 47 in the identification data in the heading of the record. All official documents and orders in the applicant's official military personnel file (OMPF) list the same first and middle names as they are recorded on his DD Form 47 and DA Form 24. This Record of Proceedings along with the application and supporting documents will be filed in his military record.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076005C070215

    Original file (2002076005C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: Given the applicant’s authentication of the information contained in his DD Form 214 and lacking evidence to the contrary, the Board is compelled to presume administrative regularity in its preparation and that it reflects the correct middle name contained in his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071151C070402

    Original file (2002071151C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. He requests this last name recorded in his military records now be corrected to reflect the official last name given him at birth. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show:

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070003028C071029

    Original file (20070003028C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his record be corrected to reflect his correct name. However, while the validity of his birth certificate and the name listed is not in question, the evidence of record confirms the applicant was inducted, served, and was separated under the name as it is currently listed on all records and documents contained in his Official Military Personnel File. The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000227

    Original file (20090000227.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the last name listed in his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) and on his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) be changed to show the last name listed on his birth certificate. While it is understandable why the applicant would like to have his last name changed in his military records and on his DD Form 214 to match his birth certificate, the available records show he entered the military, served, and was separated under the last...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060009995

    Original file (20060009995.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the last name shown on his separation document (DD Form 214) be changed to show his correct last name. The applicant's Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) contains a Record of Induction (DD Form 47) that lists the last name the applicant now claims is incorrect. The DD Form 398 and DD form 1584 also shows that the last name of the applicant's father was the same last name used by the applicant upon his entry on active duty, and that the last...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009602

    Original file (20090009602.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant states his name is G----- H------, Jr. and not B---- G. H------; that he moved from the address listed on the DD Form 214 over 30 years ago; and that he has 2 years of college education. It further shows he had completed 11 years of education.