Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072854C070403
Original file (2002072854C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 29 April 2003
         DOCKET NUMBER: A2002072854


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. William Blakely Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. John N. Slone Chairperson
Mr. Thomas Lanyi Member
Mr. Bernard P. Ingold Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)

FINDINGS :

1. The applicant has exhausted or the Board has waived the requirement for exhaustion of all administrative remedies afforded by existing law or regulations.


2. The applicant requests, in effect, relief from a $6,000.00 debt to the government.

3. The applicant states, in effect, that she incurred this debt to the government as a result of her being unable to fulfill the three year Selected Reserve Recruitment Bonus Test Program Contract she entered into with the Army. However, she claims that this inability to complete the required service was through no fault of her own and was the result of her being reassigned to positions that were caught in the downsizing and restructuring of the Army. As a result of Army downsizing, she was left without a slot to serve in the last year of her duty required as a bonus recipient. She states that she requested reassignment to anywhere in order to fulfill the contracted obligations but was told by high ranking officials not to worry. In support of her application, she submits a copy of her Selected Reserve Recruitment Bonus Test Program Contract, her discharge orders and certificate, two Officer Evaluation Reports
(OER-DA Form 67-8), and a Service School Academic Evaluation Report
(AER-DA Form 1059).

4. The applicant’s military records show that on 10 August 1994, she was commissioned a first lieutenant in the Army Nurse Corps (ANC) of the United States Army Reserve (USAR); and that she served in that status until being honorably discharged on 2 October 2000.

5. On 22 June 1994, during her entrance processing, the applicant elected to participate in the Selected Reserve Recruitment Bonus Test Program. This program entitled the applicant to an annual bonus of $6,000.00 based on her satisfactory participation in at least 12 days of active duty for training for each year. This agreement obligated the applicant to serve in the ANC specialty of 66E (Operating Nurse) in the USAR for 3 years.

6. In the processing of this case an advisory opinion was obtained from the Chief, Enlisted Accessions Division, Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-1, Department of the Army (DA). This DA personnel official states that this case was thoroughly researched, all available records were reviewed, and the applicant and representatives from the Army Reserve Personnel Command (ARPERSCOM) were interviewed. As a result, the DA G-1 recommends that the applicant be given full relief from the $6,000.00 debt incurred as a result of her not being able to fulfill her 3 year Selected Reserve Recruitment Bonus Test Program Contract.


7. The DA G-1 advisory opinion further stated that the applicant’s failure to fulfill the required service obligation was through no fault of her own. Rather, it was due to the inactivation of the applicant’s unit, her reassignment to unit without an Operating Room Nurse (66E) position, the deletion of an Individual Mobilization Augmentation position she was assigned to, and the ultimate unavailability of another unit or position requiring an Operating Room Nurse with the specialty 66E. In addition, following an informal legal review, a general military law representative of the Office of The Judge Advocate General (OTJAG) verbally concurred with the DA G-1 assessment, noting that is was not legally objectionable to relieve the applicant of the debt. The applicant was provided a copy of this advisory opinion in order to have the opportunity to respond and she concurred with the opinion.

8. Memorandum, Subject: Letter of Instruction (LOI) for changes to Army Regulation 135-7, Army National Guard and Army Reserve Incentive Program, dated 25 August 1995, was issued by the Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff for Personnel. This memorandum provided the policy guidance for the Selected Reserve Recruitment Test Program. Paragraph 3d provides that a service member involuntarily transferred between units of the Selected Reserve or to the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR) as a result of force structure changes or force reduction actions may, as determined by the Secretary of the Army, be eligible to receive the benefits identified under the initial incentive contracts.

CONCLUSIONS:

1. The Board notes the applicant’s contention that her failure to satisfy her Selected Reserve Recruitment Bonus Test Program service obligation was through no fault of her own and that she should be relieved of the $6,000.00 debt she incurred as a result.

2. The evidence of record, as confirmed by the DA G-1 advisory opinion, shows that the applicant’s failure to complete her contracted service obligation was due to Army downsizing that resulted in the inactivation of the applicant’s initial USAR unit, her reassignment to a unit not authorized her specialty, the elimination of an IMA position she was assigned to, and the ultimate unavailability of a unit that was authorized Army Operating Room Nurse for her to be reassigned to.

3. In view of the facts of this case, the recommendation of the DA G-1 and the LOI it appears that the identification of the applicant’s bonus for recoupment action was in error. Accordingly, the record should be corrected to show that the recoupment of her $6000.00 bonus was erroneous as well as any accrual of interest is in error and should be removed from her record.

4. Any erroneous collection action should be terminated and reimburse to her any portion of the debt that may have been already collected.

5. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.

RECOMMENDATION:

That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing:

a. amending the applicant’s Selected Reserve Recruitment Bonus Test Program Contract to show that she satisfied the service obligation under the original terms of Selected Reserve Recruitment Bonus Test Program Contract as an Army Nurse;

b. by showing that the recoupment of her $6000.00 bonus and interest accrued on the debt was in error;

c. by suspending collection of the $6,000.00 debt she incurred as a result of not completing the initial 3 year service obligation; and by reimbursing her any portion of the debt and/or interest on the debt that has already been collected.

BOARD VOTE:

___js____ ___bpi __ ___tl____ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION




                  _____John N. Slone______
                  CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID AR2002072854
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 2003/04/29
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION GRANT
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 293 128.1000
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012016

    Original file (20140012016.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * she was only granted a bonus with her initial enlistment * she was never granted a bonus upon her reenlistment * the paperwork for the bonus was not processed until her reenlistment * she never actually received the bonus money, but incurred a debt nonetheless * her final pay upon Army discharge was withheld due to this debt 3. The advisory opinion states the $6,000.00 bonus was a seasonal bonus for the airborne specific option, clearly affiliated with the airborne...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006556

    Original file (20080006556.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provided the following additional documentary evidence in support of her application: a. DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document, Armed Forces of the United States), dated 15 May 2007 (DCARNG Enlistment); b. DD Form 3540-R (Certificate of Acknowledgement of U.S. Army Reserve Service Requirements and Method of Fulfillment), dated 20 October 2006; c. Undated Written Agreement - Enlisted Affiliation Bonus; d. DA Form 5691-R (Request for Reserve Component Assignment Orders),...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006322

    Original file (20080006322.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s records show that she enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 23 January 2003 for a period of 8 years. Section III (Acknowledgement) of the applicant’s DA Form 5261-R (Selected Reserve Incentive Program-Enlistment Bonus Addendum) shows that in connection with her enlistment in the USAR, she elected “assignment to a unit (high priority) authorized by Headquarters, Department of the Army (HQDA) for a bonus entitlement in a military occupational specialty (MOS) that is also...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008042

    Original file (20140008042.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record confirms the applicant enlisted in the ROTC Program. She agreed that if she were disenrolled from the ROTC Program for any reason, she would repay her scholarship debt or be ordered to active duty in the rank/grade of PVT/E-1 for an appropriate number of years. As a result, the Board recommends that: a. all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending her ROTC scholarship contract to show she would satisfy the service obligation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013098

    Original file (20080013098.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, under normal circumstances when a scholarship cadet is disenrolled and fails to complete the ROTC contract, he or she is offered two options for repayment of the scholarship debt – serve on active duty for a specified period of time, or repay the debt. In an advisory opinion, the U. S. Army Cadet Command noted that its headquarters had no records dating as far back as the time of the applicant's enlistment and contracting into the Army Senior ROTC Program. His current enlistment...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150007220

    Original file (20150007220.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests suspension of the debt he incurred after he was disenrolled from the Reserve Officers' Training Corps (ROTC) Program while he completes his active duty service obligation. His enlistment contract and/or DA Form 3286 (Regular Army Statement of Understanding) do not show he was granted an enlistment bonus. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. amending his ROTC Program scholarship...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040000314C070208

    Original file (20040000314C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that her current active duty commitment and service in the United States Navy be accepted as repayment of her Reserve Officers' Training Corps (ROTC) scholarship debt. The applicant states, in effect, that she has served over 2 years of active duty in the Navy Nurse Corps and that her service in the Navy should be accepted in lieu of monetary repayment of her Army ROTC debt. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017064

    Original file (20140017064.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests: a. correction of her records to show she is authorized to retain her Non-Prior Service Enlistment Bonus (NPSEB) offered at the time of her enlistment in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 28 December 2006; and b. correction of her records to allow her to retain the Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP) incentive in the amount of $20,000.00; and c. voidance of her reassignment orders to the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR), dated 31 October 2011. She was erroneously...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060004217C070205

    Original file (20060004217C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s New STRAP Service Agreement is not available. The application indicates he had a 60-month active duty service obligation (ADSO) due to his one-year participation in the U.S. Army Reserve, STRAP. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his New STRAP Service Agreement contract to show he would satisfy the STRAP debt under the terms of the New STRAP Service Agreement by successfully...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088640C070403

    Original file (2003088640C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of her records to show she completed her obligation under the Specialized Training Assistance Program (STRAP) in December 1996 as shown on her original contract she signed on 2 July 1990. The evidence of record shows the applicant signed a DA Form 5685-R, version dated March 1990, for participation in the New STRAP. However, the applicant's contract also shows she acknowledged that she had incurred a service obligation of 2 years for each year...