| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Deyon D. Battle | Analyst |
| Mr. Samuel A. Crumpler | Chairperson | |
| Ms. Regan K. Smith | Member | |
| Mr. Antonio Uribe | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his undesirable discharge be changed to an honorable discharge.
APPLICANT STATES: That he was informed that he should have been honorably discharged because he was suffering from a medical nervous condition. In support of his application, he submits a copy of his Army medical records.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records, although partially destroyed in the 1973 fire at the National Personnel Records Center in St. Louis, show:
On 16 January 1951, he enlisted in the Army in St. Louis, Missouri, for 3 years, in the pay grade of E-1. He successfully completed his training as an infantryman. He was transferred to Korea in August 1951 where he remained until he returned to the Continental United States in July 1952.
The records show that the applicant’s initial period of absence without leave (AWOL) was from 6 November 1952 until 10 November 1952.
He was convicted by a special court-martial on 30 January 1953, of being AWOL from 22 December 1952 until 14 January 1953. He was sentenced to confinement at hard labor for 60 days and a forfeiture of pay in the amount of $55.00.
On 30 April 1953, the applicant was convicted by a special court-martial of being AWOL from 1 April until 15 April 1953. He was sentenced to confinement at hard labor for 45 days and a forfeiture of pay in the amount of $25.00 per month for 3 months.
The records also show that he was AWOL from 16 June until 3 July 1953 and from 6 July until 9 July 1953 and that each time that he returned from being AWOL he was placed in confinement.
On 21 September 1953, the applicant underwent a neuropsychiatric evaluation as a result of his frequent AWOLs. The psychiatrist determined that he had a basically passive dependent reaction with accompanying dissociative reactions. Psychological testing revealed that he was threatened in his relationships with others, particularly with dominant authority and that he was of average intelligence. The psychiatrist further determined that the applicant was well developed, alert, oriented and cooperative, but appeared to be rather dull. The psychiatrist opined that the applicant was not insane; possessed sufficient mental capacity to know the difference between right and wrong and that he should have been able to adhere to the right and refrain from the wrong. The psychiatrist further opined that he could be considered to be mentally responsible for his acts and that his conditions were not amenable to hospitalization, treatment, disciplinary action, training, transfer to another station or organization, or reclassification to another type of duty. The psychiatrist concluded by indicating that the applicant had no mental or physical disease or defect which would warrant Physical Evaluation Board proceedings or other disposition through medical channels. The psychiatrist recommended that no further attempt at rehabilitation be made since it was believed that he was useless to the service and further attempts would be of no avail. The psychiatrist also recommended that the applicant appear before a board of officers with a view of separation from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 615-369, due to inadaptability.
The applicant went AWOL again on 29 September 1953 and he remained absent until he returned on 13 October 1953, at which time he was placed in pretrial confinement.
On 17 October 1953, the applicant’s commanding officer recommended that he be discharged from the Army under the provisions of Army Regulation 615-366, for the best interest of the service, in lieu of trial by court-martial. The appropriate authority approved the recommendation for discharge and directed that he be furnished an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. Accordingly, on 13 November 1953, he was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 615-366, due to misconduct as a result of physical unfitness and aggravated AWOL. He had completed 2 years, 1 month and 19 days of total active service and he had 253 days of lost time due to AWOL and confinement. He was furnished an Undesirable Discharge Certificate.
Army Regulation 615-366, in effect at that time, set forth the policy and procedures for separation of enlisted personnel for misconduct including aggravated AWOL and for desertion and physical unfitness. Section II of that regulation authorized discharge of individuals who had been charged with desertion and were physically unfit for military service. An undesirable discharge was considered appropriate.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
2. The Board has noted the applicant’s contentions. However, the evidence of record clearly shows that he underwent a mental status evaluation and a psychiatrist determined that he able to distinguish right from wrong and to adhere to the right. There is no evidence of record to support the applicant’s contention that he was suffering from a medical nervous condition that would have excused his continuous AWOLs.
3. He was convicted twice by a special court-martial of being AWOL and he continued to go AWOL until he had 253 days of lost time due to AWOL and confinement.
4. In view of his numerous acts of indiscipline, it appears that his service was properly characterized.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___rks __ ___au___ __sac___ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2002072818 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 2003/02/11 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | UD |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 19531113 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR 615-366 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | 626 |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 642 | 144.6115 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY1990-1993 | 9207189
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. An investigation into his absence was launched and by July 1951 the commander, Fort Custer concluded there was “no documentary evidence available concerning the initial date of absence” and as such recommended the applicant be discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 615-366 (desertion), noting “trial barred by Article 43” UCMJ. The Board notes that separation...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004103833C070208
The applicant requests that the undesirable discharge of her deceased husband, a former service member (FSM) be upgraded to honorable. The attending psychiatrist opined that the FSM was showing a chronic form of psychosis and as such he was not responsible for his conduct. The available records fail to show that this Board ever received or considered the FSM’s application for correction of military records dated 19 September 2002.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015318
The civil court sentenced him to imprisonment for 5 to 10 years. However, his service records show on 1 September 1955, the Commanding General, Headquarters, Infantry Center, Fort Benning, GA, ordered the applicant discharged under the provisions of section IV, Army Regulation 615-366 (Enlisted Personnel Discharges) by reason of civil conviction with the issuance of an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. On 13 November 1962, the Army Discharge Review Board denied his petition for an upgrade...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001307
On 28 June 1953, the FSM's unit recommended a board of officers be convened to determine whether the FSM should be discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 615-368 (Enlisted Personnel - Discharge - Unfitness). The certificate, dated 12 June 1953, issued by the Psychiatry and Neurology Service, USAH, Camp Atterbury, essentially stated: * the FSM's diagnosis was anti-social personality manifested by immaturity, impulsive behavior, lack of adequate standards of behavior, and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003085245C070212
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 5 March 1954, the applicant was given an undesirable discharge for unfitness under the provisions of Army Regulation 615-368. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record and applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070004115
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 9 August 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070004115 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The records available to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records were provided in part by the applicant and from reconstructed records. On 14 August 1953, the appropriate authority approved the applicant's...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011763
The board found that the applicant gives evidence of habits and gives evidence of traits of character which rendered retention in the service undesirable and recommended that the applicant be discharged from the service because of unfitness and that he be furnished an undesirable discharge. Evidence of record shows the applicant completed 3 years, 3 months, and 9 days of creditable active service when he was discharged. Although the applicants daughter contends that they have no...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006705
Also on 12 May 1952, the applicant's immediate commander requested a board of officers be convened under the provisions of Army Regulation 615-368 (Enlisted Men - Discharge - Unfitness (Undesirable Habits or Traits of Character)) for the purpose of determining the applicant's fitness for retention due to his habitual AWOL. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, states a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. The board found him unfit for retention and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060003453C070205
Army Regulation 615-368, also stated, in pertinent part, that a board of officers would recommend that the individual be either discharged because of unfitness, unsuitability, or retained in the service. It is also noted that the applicant now states he began drinking at the age of 12 and that alcohol was a large part of his life; however, his record of service shows that he served honorably and without any alcohol related incidents during the period 14 April 1948 to 13 April 1951. The...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062553C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: The applicant was discharged from the Army under the provisions of Army Regulation 615-368 on 26 August 1954 with an undesirable discharge.