| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Lee Cates | Analyst |
| Mr. Raymond V. O'Connor, Jr. | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Raymond J. Wagner | Member | |
| Ms. Karen Y. Fletcher | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his dishonorable discharge (DD) be upgraded to general under honorable conditions or honorable.
APPLICANT STATES: That his attorney advised him to plead guilty under a pre-trial agreement and he did. He indicates he had no intention of deserting, he was just running away from life’s problems. He still had his ID Card when he was apprehended.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
During the period 31 January 1955 to 13 December 1957, he served on active duty.
On 11 March 1958, he reenlisted in the Army.
On 10 April 1963, a psychiatric evaluation cleared him for court-martial purposes.
On 16 May 1963, he was convicted by a General Court-Martial (GCM) of desertion. He was absent from on or about 29 December 1960 to on or about 24 January 1963, when he was apprehended. His approved sentence included a DD, confinement at hard labor (CHL) for 4 months, forfeiture of $43.00 pay per month for 4 months, and reduction to pay grade E-1.
On 12 July 1963, the Army Board of Review, Office of The Judge Advocate General, found the findings of guilty and the sentence correct in law and fact and affirmed the findings of guilty and the sentence.
On 30 July 1963, a physical examination cleared the applicant for separation.
On 12 August 1968, he was discharged with a DD based on the sentence of a GCM. His Report of Separation indicates he had 3 years and 4 days of creditable service and 880 days of lost time for this period of service.
Army Regulation 635-204, then in effect, directed that an enlisted person would be discharged with a DD pursuant only to an approved sentence of a GCM.
Court-martial convictions stand as adjudged or modified by appeal through the judicial process. In accordance with Title 10, United States code, Section 1552, the authority under which this Board acts, the Army Board for Correction of Military Records is not empowered to change a discharge due to matters which
should have been raised in the appellate process, rather it is only empowered to change the severity of the sentence imposed in the court-martial process and then only if clemency is determined to be appropriate. Clemency is an act of mercy, or instance of leniency, to moderate the severity of the punishment imposed.
Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), paragraph 3-7 provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor. The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the member's service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel, or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be inappropriate.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The discharge proceedings were conducted in accordance with law and regulations applicable at the time. The character of the discharge is commensurate with the applicant's overall record of military service. His DD was proper and he is not entitled to an upgrade to a general discharge, under honorable conditions, or to an honorable discharge.
2. There is no evidence in the available records to demonstrate that the applicant was the victim of legal malpractice or that he was denied his rights in the matter.
3. The applicant has also not convinced the Board that he is entitled to clemency.
4. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
_RJW___ _KYF___ __RVO___ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2002072238 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20020926 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 110 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080446C070215
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: On 19 July 1963, the Board of Review, United States Army reviewed the applicant’s case, and it held that the findings of guilty and the sentence as approved by the convening authority were correct in law and fact.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074155C070403
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: He was placed in confinement upon his last return to military control and charges were preferred against him for the AWOL offenses on 24 September 1970.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002248
On 29 May 1963, the Board of Review, U.S. Army, affirmed the findings of guilty and approved only so much of the sentence as provided for a BCD, total forfeitures, confinement at hard labor for 6 months, and reduction to PV1/E-1. His DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) shows he was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-204 (Personnel Separations - Dishonorable and Bad-Conduct Discharges), paragraph 1b, with an under other than...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004100396C070208
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 12 August 2004 DOCKET NUMBER: AR2004100396 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Records show that remission of the sentence of the General Court-Martial resulted in a discharge date effective on or about 8 May 1965. Conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015956
The applicant requests an upgrade of his bad conduct discharge to a general discharge under honorable conditions. The applicant's records show he enlisted in the Regular Army for a period of 4 years on 28 September 1999. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074480C070403
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The convening authority did not agree with the recommendation of the investigating officer and directed that the applicant be tried by a general court-martial. Although his accomplice ended up with a less harsh sentence than he did, the applicant was granted an upgrade of his discharge from a BCD to a general discharge by the Army Clemency and Parole Board and he has not...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070001699
The applicant requests, in effect, an upgrade of his dishonorable discharge to a general under honorable conditions discharge. General Court-Martial Order Number 32, dated 14 December 1992, shows that the convening authority approved the first court-martial finings and sentence except for that part of the sentence extending to a dishonorable discharge, will be executed. The applicant's contention that his dishonorable discharge should be upgraded to a general under honorable conditions...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088840C070403
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests that his bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to honorable. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant’s conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations in effect at the time, and that his trial by court-martial was warranted by the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063281C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's available military records show: On 27 March 1963, the United States Court of Military Appeals denied the applicant’s Petition for Grant of Review.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003858
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 20 November 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140003858 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests that his bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to an honorable discharge. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.