| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Jessie B. Strickland | Analyst |
| Mr. Raymond V. O’Connor, Jr. | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Richard T. Dunbar | Member | |
| Mr. Kenneth W. Lapin | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a more favorable discharge.
APPLICANT STATES: That he was unjustly discharged at a young age as a teenager who didn’t know any better and the discharge has affected the outcome of his life. He further states that it has turned into a life sentence that he would like removed. He also states that he has no veterans benefits and did not know that he could appeal the discharge.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
He enlisted with parental consent at Fort Hamilton, New York, on 15 August 1972 for a period of 3 years and training as a field wireman. He was transferred to Fort Dix, New Jersey to undergo his training.
On 16 November 1972, while attending his advanced individual training (AIT), nonjudicial punishment (NJP) was imposed against him for failure to go to his place of duty. His punishment consisted of extra duty and restriction for 7 days.
He completed his AIT and was transferred to Baumholder, Germany, on 10 January 1973, for duty as a field wireman. On 29 January 1973, NJP was imposed against him for unlawfully striking another soldier in the head with his fist. His punishment consisted of a forfeiture of pay and correctional custody for 14 days.
The applicant went absent without leave (AWOL) from 15 May to 18 May 1973. However, the record is silent as to any punishment imposed.
On 13 June 1973, NJP was imposed against him for being disrespectful in deportment towards his first sergeant. His punishment consisted of an oral reprimand, a forfeiture in pay, extra duty and restriction.
On 7 January 1974, NJP was imposed against him for being absent from his place of duty. His punishment consisted of a reduction to the pay grade of E-2, extra duty and restriction.
In September 1973, the commander received a letter of indebtedness from the local military banking facility on the installation. The letter informed the commander that the applicant had opened a checking account on 3 September 1973 with a deposit of $125.00 and by the 19th of September 1973, he had written 13 checks totaling $886.00, with no additional deposits.
The applicant and the commander received a letter from the banking facility on 4 December 1973, indicating that the matter would be pursued for collection through the German Court.
On 26 December 1973, the commander received a letter of indebtedness from a civilian attorney in Germany attempting to collect money from the applicant for funds ($156.26) he had borrowed from an airline to purchase a ticket.
On 23 January 1974, the applicant’s commander notified him that he was recommending that he be separated from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 13, for unfitness, due to his frequent involvement in incidents of a discreditable nature with civil and military authorities. He cited as the basis for his recommendation, the applicant’s failure to respond to numerous counseling sessions, his disciplinary record, his failure to pay his just debts, writing bad checks, failure to accept military authority, and failure to conform to military standards.
After consulting with counsel, the applicant waived his right to appear before a board of officers and elected not to submit a statement in his own behalf. He also acknowledged that he understood the implications of an undesirable discharge and the fact that he might be ineligible for benefits.
On 24 January 1974, the commander submitted the recommendation for discharge and indicated that the applicant had been a total failure as a soldier. He had been a consistent disciplinary problem since his arrival, disciplinary action had no effect on him and he showed a complete disregard for authority.
The appropriate authority (a major general) approved the recommendation on 13 February 1974 and directed that he be furnished with an Undesirable Discharge Certificate.
Accordingly, he was discharged under other than honorable conditions on 26 February 1974, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200. chapter 13, for unfitness due to his frequent involvement in incidents of a discreditable nature with civil and military authorities. He had served 1 year, 6 months and 9 days of total active service and had 3 days of lost time due to AWOL.
There is no indication in the available records to show that the applicant ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board’s 15-year statute of limitations.
Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 13, in effect at the time, established policy and provided guidance for eliminating enlisted personnel found to be unfit or unsuitable for further military service. An individual could be found unfit for various types of misconduct that included frequent incidents of a discreditable nature with military and civilian authorities. An undesirable discharge was normally considered appropriate.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The applicant’s administrative discharge was accomplished in accordance with the applicable regulations with no indication of any violations of the applicant’s rights.
2. Accordingly, the type of discharge directed and the reasons therefore were appropriate
3. The applicant’s contentions have been noted by the Board. However, they are not sufficiently mitigating to warrant relief when compared to his overall undistinguished record of service.
4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__rtd ___ __kwl ___ __rvo ___ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2002072065 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 2002/07/25 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | UD |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 1974/02/26 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR635-200/CH13 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | UNFIT |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 592 | 144.5000/A5100 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004100468C070208
On 9 July 1975, the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) denied the applicant's request for an honorable discharge. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. However, the separation authority determined that there was no "agreement" and that the undesirable discharge was appropriate and correct.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | AR20070009079C071029
Edward E. Montgomery | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests, in effect, that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to an honorable or a general discharge. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was convicted by a special court-martial; that he had NJP imposed against him twice; and that he was counseled on approximately 18 separate occasions while he was in the Army.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075118C070403
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 2 November 1972, nonjudicial punishment (NJP) was imposed against him for failure to go to his place of duty. He applied to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) on 6 June 1977, for an upgrade of his discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001051945C070420
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The Board considered the following evidence: The applicant went absent without leave (AWOL) on 30 August 1974 and he remained AWOL until he surrendered to civil authorities and was returned to his unit on 19 September 1974.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091812C070212
However, there is no evidence of record that shows the punishment imposed. A review of the available records fails to show that the applicant ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board’s 15-year statute of limitations. The Board determined that the evidence presented and the merits of this case are insufficient to warrant the relief requested, and therefore, it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080332C070215
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 26 January 1976, the applicant's commander advised the applicant of his rights and preferred charges against him for the AWOL offense. There is no evidence in the available records to show that the applicant ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board's 15-year statute of limitations.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088672C070403
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. On 23 June 1976, the separation authority approved the recommendation for separation and directed that the applicant be furnished an undesirable discharge. The Board reviewed the applicant's record of service which included four nonjudicial punishments, one civil conviction for Grand Larceny and 23 days of lost time and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050008804C070206
On 30 November 1972, while serving in the pay grade of E-4, he reenlisted for a period of 3 years and assignment to Fort Meade, Maryland. The U.S. Court of Appeals, observing that applicants to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) are by statute allowed 15 years to apply there, and that this Board's exhaustion requirement (Army Regulation 15-185, paragraph 2-8), effectively shortens that filing period, has determined that the 3 year limit on filing to the Army Board for Correction of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069956C070402
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 26 November 1973, the applicant submitted an appeal to the punishment of the Article 15 proceedings, dated 10 October 1973. In reviewing the applicant’s record, the Board noted his record of indiscipline, to include nonjudicial punishments and a special court-martial.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000487
Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. The applicant's record of service included numerous adverse counseling statements, a bar to reenlistment, four nonjudicial punishments, and 3 days of lost time. Therefore, the applicant's record of service is insufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge or a general discharge.