Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071848C070403
Original file (2002071848C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:


         BOARD DATE: 27 AUGUST 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002071848

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Kenneth H. Aucock Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. Irene N. Wheelwright Chairperson
Mr. Arthur A. Omartian Member
Mr. Thomas Lanyi Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)

APPLICANT REQUESTS: Reconsideration of his request for award of the Purple Heart.

APPLICANT STATES: That his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show award of the Purple Heart for an injury to this right arm. He states that a medic treated his right arm for a bullet graze, and he believed that the documentation was placed in his service records. He submits five notarized statements attesting to his claim. Additionally, he submits a statement from a Member of Congress attesting to his contention that he was wounded.

NEW EVIDENCE OR INFORMATION: Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in a memorandum prepared to reflect the Board's original consideration of his case on 7 June 2001 (AR2001053971).

In a 5 March 2002 statement, a former fellow soldier stated that he and the applicant were located in the same region in Vietnam, and at the time of the fire [fight] he was told that the applicant had been wounded.

In a 5 March 2002 statement, the applicant’s mother stated that her son was wounded in Vietnam. In a statement of that same date, the applicant’s wife stated that during the years of their marriage, the applicant mentioned on numerous occasions that he was wounded in the right arm.

In another 5 March 2002 statement, an individual who had known the applicant for 36 years said that he was told by the applicant and by the applicant’s cousin, that the applicant had been wounded in Vietnam. Another individual, in a 5 March 2002 statement, said that he also knew that the applicant was wounded in Vietnam.

In a 16 April 2002 statement, a Member of Congress stated that he had known the applicant his entire life and could attest to the fact that he served in Vietnam and that he was wounded there.

Information from the Total Army Personnel Command Awards Branch indicated that there was no record that the applicant was listed as a casualty on the Vietnam casualty roster maintained by that agency.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. Notwithstanding the applicant’s contentions, there is no evidence that he was wounded in action. There is no medical evidence to show that he was wounded or treated for a wound. The Board has considered the information contained in the statements he provides with his request; however, those statements, while not inconsequential, for the most part, are based on second hand information, and while the Board has no reason to doubt the statements he has provided, such individual statements are acceptable only when corroborating evidence is available from official sources. There is no evidence concerning the circumstances of the applicant’s alleged wound, and there are no eyewitness accounts to substantiate the applicant’s claim. Statements by individuals 35 years subsequent to the applicant’s tour of duty in Vietnam are not a sufficient basis for award of the Purple Heart.

2. The applicant has submitted neither probative evidence nor a convincing argument in support of his request.

3. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy that requirement.

4. The overall merits of the case, including the latest submissions and arguments are insufficient as a basis for the Board to reverse its previous decision.

5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__INW __ __AAO__ ___TL___ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records



INDEX

CASE ID AR2002071848
SUFFIX
RECON 20020827
DATE BOARDED YYYYMMDD
TYPE OF DISCHARGE (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 107.00
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.



Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087847C070212

    Original file (2003087847C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: His DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) does not show award of the Purple Heart. Consequently, there is insufficient evidence to grant the applicant's request for award of the Purple Heart.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075331C070403

    Original file (2002075331C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence in the available records which shows the applicant was wounded or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. The staff of the Board is authorized to determine whether or not such evidence has been submitted. However, these statements are not sufficient by themselves as a basis for an award of the Purple Heart in view of evidence of record which shows the applicant was not wounded as a result of hostile action.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078530C070215

    Original file (2002078530C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provided a personal account of his wounding, dated 5 June 2002. In this addendum, the former platoon leader attests that he was the applicant's platoon leader at the time of his wounding, that he was physically present at the time of the applicant's wounding by enemy ground fire, and that he personally saw the wound as the applicant received field medical treatment. However, in the absence of orders or other evidence of record showing the applicant was wounded or treated for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003085670C070212

    Original file (2003085670C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 7 October 1999, the ABCMR denied the applicant’s request because the applicant had submitted the same medical evidence it had considered with his previous application and there was an absence of conclusive evidence or an eyewitness account that the injury resulted from combat related action. After review of new evidence submitted by the applicant, the Board concluded...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001066254C070421

    Original file (2001066254C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080050C070215

    Original file (2002080050C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    There are no orders in the applicant’s service personnel records which show that he was awarded the Purple Heart. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time of the applicant's service, provided that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. However, the DA Form 1051 was not signed by a medical officer and it does not indicate that the applicant was a battle casualty or that his injury was the result of hostile actions or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011489

    Original file (20060011489.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 13 March 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060011489 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests, in effect, reconsideration of his earlier request to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) that he be awarded the Purple Heart. This award certificate, by itself, is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060002142C070205

    Original file (20060002142C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests reconsideration of his application to correct his records by upgrading his discharge, showing entitlement for PTSD (post- traumatic stress disorder), and award of the Purple Heart. The applicant states that he suffered from PTSD as a result of being in Vietnam. While PTSD was not recognized as a specific illness at the time of the applicant's separation from the service, the fact that an individual might not be fit for further military service because of psychosis,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002083112C070215

    Original file (2002083112C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: There are no Army or VA medical records contained in the applicant's official file, and the applicant has not submitted any to support his contention.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078569C070215

    Original file (2002078569C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The staff of the Board is authorized to determine whether or not such evidence has been submitted. However, these medical records do not show that the applicant was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. However, in the absence of orders or other evidence of record showing the applicant was wounded or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action in Vietnam, the Board determined that this statement is not sufficient as a basis for award of the Purple Heart.