| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. G. E. Vandenberg | Analyst |
| Ms. Karol A. Kennedy | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Arthur A. Omartian | Member | |
| Mr. Raymond J. Wagner | Member |
THE BOARD ADDITIONALLY FINDS:
15. The Board has received information from the Kentucky Army National Guard (KYARNG) that a mathematical error was found on the terminal date of eligibility for retirement, which resulted in a retirement date exceeding statutory maximums.
16. A calculation of the applicant's dates of service found that the correct date for the applicant's completion of 20 years of active federal service was 30 June 2000 not 30 September 2000.
17. It was also requested that the Board clarify its direction of the applicant's status for the period between his release from the KYARNG and his retirement.
THE BOARD ADDITIONALLY CONCLUDES:
8. It was not the intent of the Board to afford the applicant an extension of service beyond the normal period of service allowed by policy.
9. Therefore, the Board concludes that it would correct a mathematical error by showing that the applicant's retirement date as 30 June 2000.
10. It was the intent of the Board that the applicant be shown to have continued in an active status for the period in question. Therefore, it is proper to show that the applicant was transferred to the IRR effective the date of his release from the KYARNG, with an immediate transfer to active duty in the AGR program, and that he be shown to have performed on active duty until his 30 June 2000 retirement.
11. In view of the foregoing findings and conclusions, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s records as recommended below.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS:
That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by amending the Board’s recommendation 1, appearing in the proceedings, dated 23 May 2001, to show that:
b. the individual concerned was transferred to the IRR with an immediate placement on active duty in the AGR program;
c. he remained on active duty until his date of retirement; and,
d. he was retired on 30 June 2000 not 30 September 2000.
BOARD VOTE:
__KAK___ __AAO__ __RJW__ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
_ Karol A. Kennedy______
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2002071819 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20020702 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 136.01 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002066321C070402
APPLICANT REQUESTS: Correction to his date of rank for lieutenant colonel from 27 September to 4 April 2001. A promotion memorandum dated 23 October 2001 was issued to him showing his date of rank and promotion effective date for lieutenant colonel as 27 September 2001. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, and advisory opinion(s), it is concluded:
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060017409
Department of Military Affairs, KYARNG, Frankfurt, Kentucky, Orders Number 212-805, dated 31 July 2006 shows the applicant was honorably separated from the Army National Guard and transferred to the IRR effective 31 July 2006. AHRC, St Louis, Missouri, Orders Number B-09-606511, dated 1 September 2006, show the applicant was promoted to the grade of colonel with an effective date and date of rank of 1 September 2006. Evidence of records shows that the applicant did not transfer to the IRR...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060807C070421
On 17 January 1991, the 3/200 ADA battalion commander sent to the applicant at his Loveland, Colorado, address, a AGONM Form 20-12-11B.2 (Record of Special Proceeding of Non-Judicial Punishment – Absence from Unit Training Assembly, Drill, or Annual Training), notifying the applicant of the commander’s intent to impose an Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), punishment of reduction in grade as a result of his 16 unexcused absences from unit drill from September through...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062248C070421
B___ then applied to this Board for the RCSBP annuity in 1995. Since he was married on the date he was eligible to participate in the RCSBP, by law he could not have made a person with insurable interest election. However, since it was clearly the FSM’s intent to provide for his former spouse, the applicant, and not B___, and since spousal concurrence with a failure to elect spouse coverage was not required at the time, there was no legal error or injustice in not granting B___ the RCSBP annuity.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050007597C070206
It directed his retirement points be adjusted to 79 points per service year, until his MRD, and that he be paid any additional monies due as if he had performed the additional IDT and AT periods. Upon review of the applicant's file, in preparation for final administrative processing of his promotions, several procedural discrepancies where found and it was determined that additional Board action was necessary to correct these factors to properly afford the applicant the recommended relief. ...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009171
He was transferred to the USAR Individual Ready Reserve (IRR) effective 2 March 1993 to complete his 8-year obligation and should therefore have been separated from the IRR effective 14 May 1996. In a memorandum, dated 24 April 2012, the Iowa ARNG stated its full support of the applicant's request for correction of his separation from the IRR. There is no evidence of record and he provided none to show he resigned or requested to be separated from the IRR upon the completion of his MSO or...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012394
The applicant also submits a letter dated 29 January 2010 from the KYARNG Director of Administrative Service who states he conducted a review of the applicant's records and following discussions with the SJA and Personnel Directorate (J1), along with the state attorney and former SJA, he believes the applicant was summarily discharged from the KYARNG without appropriate due process. The applicant had 18 years of qualifying service for retired pay purposes at the time of his discharge from...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050017983C070206
The applicant also states that prior to his retirement, in December 2002, the unit had a drill with all members of the unit present, including some that he had not seen before. The USARC determined that the applicant filled a colonel position at the State Department unit while serving as a lieutenant colonel. Crediting the applicant with a qualifying year, as discussed above, and payment of the difference in pay between a lieutenant colonel and colonel for creditable periods of service...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071010C070402
The recommendation contained in the ARPERSCOM advisory opinion is that the applicant be granted de facto status for the periods 1 December 1999 through 28 December 2001. The evidence of record confirms that although the applicant technically failed to comply with the two year promotion service remaining requirement within 30 days of the effective date of his promotion, this was more the result of administrative processing errors rather than a reflection of the applicant’s intent not to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004721C070206
The applicant states that he is currently employed as a civilian with the status of military technician (MT) [no longer employed as an MT effective 15 April 2006] for which he needs to maintain a Selective Reserve (SELRES) status or be retired involuntarily or medically. The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error or injustice which occurred on 27 July 2001, the date of his transfer to the Retired Reserve. Chapter 7 of the regulation applies to the removal of Soldiers from...