Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071804C070403
Original file (2002071804C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 19 September 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002071804

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Vic Whitney Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. Joann Langston Chairperson
Mr. Ronald E. Blakely Member
Ms. Melinda M. Darby Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his pay grade be corrected to E-2 and his Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) be shown on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge From Active Duty).

APPLICANT STATES: That his pay grade is inaccurate and his MOS is not listed. He provides documents from his military record including his Individual Training Record, his certificate for completion of Basic Combat Training (BCT), his certificate for completion of training in MOS 31U, and a Separation Pay Worksheet.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

He enlisted and entered active duty on 6 April 1995 in the pay grade of E-1. An automated Individual Training Record, dated 6 June 1995, shows that he completed all required training as of that date. The applicant provides a certificate that shows he completed BCT effective 8 June 1995.

On 10 June 1995, the applicant was placed in a remedial physical training program after failing to achieve a passing score on an assessment Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT). He failed a diagnostic APFT on 17 June 1995. He failed a second diagnostic APFT on 24 June 1995. He failed a third diagnostic APFT on 14 July 1995.

The available records show that he was excused from physical training from 24 to 31 July 1995. He failed his forth diagnostic APFT on 2 August 1995. On 18 August 1995, he was excused from physical training until 22 August 1995. On 30 August 1995, the applicant failed his first record APFT. On 6 September 1995, he failed his second record APFT.

On 25 September 1995, the applicant's commander informed him of recommended separation action as a habitual APFT failure. The applicant acknowledged receipt of the contemplated separation action and waived his rights to consult with counsel or to provide a statement in his own behalf. The recommendation was forwarded to the separation authority noting that the applicant was an APFT failure who could not meet the minimum standards prescribed for successful completion of training.

The applicant provides a copy of a certificate that shows that he completed training for MOS 31U effective 11 October 1995. There are no orders in the available record to show that he was awarded MOS 31U and his Personnel Qualification Record does not show that he completed the MOS 31U training.



The separation authority approved the commander's recommendation and directed an uncharacterized separation under the authority of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 11.

A Separation Pay Worksheet, dated 22 November 1995, shows the applicant's pay grade as E-1. The form also shows that his final pay due at separation had $89.25 deducted for an overpayment in the pay grade of E-2 from 6 through 30 October 1995.

Effective 22 November 1995, the applicant was separated from active duty in the pay grade of E-1 under the authority of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 11 for entry level performance and conduct. His Character of Service is shown as Uncharacterized. He had 7 months and 17 days active duty service.

On 19 June 2002, the Army Discharge Review Board voted to amend the applicant's DD Form 214 to show his Character of Service as Honorable and to show the authority for separation as Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 5, Secretarial Authority.

There is no documentation in the available record or provided by the applicant to show that he was ever promoted to the pay grade of E-2. All of the documents in the available record show the applicant's pay grade as E-1.

Army Regulation 635-5 provides the policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214. The regulation provides for the recording of primary specialty (MOS) served in for at least 1-year.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. There is no evidence of record, and no credible evidence provided by the applicant, that he was ever promoted to the pay grade of E-2 and was serving in that grade at the time of his separation.

2. There is no basis to add the applicant's MOS to his DD Form 214 since his service in that MOS does not meet the minimum 1-year requirement of the regulation.

3. In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.


4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__jl___ __rb____ __md______ DENY APPLICATION




                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2002071804
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20020919
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 100.05
2. 129.05
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008558

    Original file (20140008558.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to change his character of service from uncharacterized to honorable. His record contains a DA Form 705 that shows he took a Diagnostic APFT on four occasions during AIT. His record contains four DA Forms 4856 (General Counseling Form) that show he was counseled for failing the diagnostic APFT for the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd, time.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000370C070206

    Original file (20050000370C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He further states his discharge from the Army for unsatisfactory performance was not deserved, and now requests he be given a medical discharge for his flat feet and the torn ligament in his knee, or that his records be corrected to show he completed his enlistment and was separated by reason of ETS. The APFT scorecard shows he completed 42 pushups, 65 sit-ups, and the 6.2 miles alternate bicycle event in 37 minutes and 30 seconds, which again resulted in a failure of his APFT. Therefore,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050015207C070206

    Original file (20050015207C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that her enlistment contract be corrected to show that she participated in the Junior Reserve Officer Training Corps (JROTC) program; that she enlisted in the grade of E-2, was advanced to the grade of E-3, and payment of all back pay as a result of these corrections; payment of an enlistment bonus (EB) in the amount of $5,000; repayment of loans under the Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP); and referral to a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) and/or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087266C070212

    Original file (2003087266C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 15 October 1995, while still on profile, counsel states that the applicant failed his alternate APFT. The evidence of record shows that the applicant failed a record APFT on 15 October 1995 and again on 3 August 1997. There is no evidence of record that the applicant ever passed a record APFT from the date of his appointment to the date of his discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011415

    Original file (20090011415.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A DA Form 4856, dated 18 June 2007, shows the applicant's platoon sergeant counseled him to make him aware that he continued to miss training due to injuries and/or physical profiles. A DA Form 4856, dated 2 July 2007, shows the applicant's company commander informed him that he would recommend to the battalion commander that the applicant be new started due to the fact that he had missed multiple training events during BCT. This is known as the Presumption of Fitness Rule which states a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018961

    Original file (20080018961.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Part Va (Performance and Potential) evaluates the rated officer’s performance and potential for promotion. The records of Soldiers who fail a record APFT for the first time and those who fail to take the APFT within the required time period must be flagged in accordance with Army Regulation 600-8-2 (Suspension of Favorable Personnel Actions). A diagnostic APFT is not a record APFT.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130006029

    Original file (AR20130006029.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s service record shows that on 21 June 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 635-200, by reason of unsatisfactory performance specifically for: a. failing a record APFT on 26 August 2009 b. failing a second record APFT on 18 November 2009. On 24 June 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of general,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050008117C070206

    Original file (20050008117C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He goes on to state that had the military done an MRI and discovered his real problem, he would have been able to complete his enlistment. He also states that his record of service will bear out that he was not an unsatisfactory Soldier, but his medical condition prevented him from passing the Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT). As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence provided which shows that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 199711263C070209

    Original file (199711263C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any) APPLICANT REQUESTS: In essence, that her entry level performance and conduct discharge from active duty on 10 April 1995 be changed to a medical discharge. The applicant's records do not contain any evidence, and she has not provided any probative medical evidence to show that she had a medical condition, which...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 199711263

    Original file (199711263.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. She was administered medication and given a profile that stated no physical training. The applicant's records do not contain any evidence, and she has not provided any probative medical evidence to show that she had a medical condition, which would have rendered her medically unable to pass her APFT.