Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071762C070403
Original file (2002071762C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 27 June 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002071762

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Robert J. McGowan Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. Irene N. Wheelwright Chairperson
Ms. Kathleen A. Newman Member
Mr. Richard T. Dunbar Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: That a memorandum of reprimand (MOR) issued on 9 November 1994, and all associated documents, be removed from the restricted fiche (R-fiche) of his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF).

APPLICANT STATES: That the MOR has had a positive effect on him and that he no longer engages in the type of behavior that led to the reprimand. He adds that he has continued his years of responsible service and wants his records to reflect the type of NCO (noncommissioned officer) he is today.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

He is a staff sergeant (SSG/E-6). In 1994, he was a sergeant (SGT/E-5) stationed at Fort Stewart, Georgia. On 30 October 1994, civilian police apprehended him for suspected drunk driving. He was given a breathalyzer test and registered a .22 reading (.10 was considered legally drunk).

The applicant was administered a MOR by the acting commander of Fort Stewart on 9 November 1994. The MOR was placed in his OMPF.

Following the CY1996 Master Sergeant Selection/Sergeant QMP (Qualitative Management Program) Board, the applicant was notified on 16 April 1996 that he was receiving a Department of the Army (DA) bar to reenlistment because of the MOR in his records. He appealed the DA-imposed bar to reenlistment on 7 May 1996 and, on 21 October 1996, he was notified that his appeal had been approved.

On 15 July 1999, the applicant applied to the DA Suitability Evaluation Board (DASEB) to have the MOR removed from the performance portion of his OMPF and placed on his R-fiche. On 13 December 1999, the DASEB approved the transfer of the MOR to his R-fiche.

Army Regulation 190-11 (Motor Vehicle Traffic Supervision) requires, in pertinent part, that a written general officer reprimand be issued to active duty Army officers, commissioned and warrant, and noncommissioned officers, to include soldiers in the grade of E-4 appointed on official orders to corporal, for driving or being in physical control of a motor vehicle on post when the blood alcohol content is 0.10 percent or higher, irrespective of other charges, or off post when the blood alcohol content is in violation of State laws, irrespective of other charges.. Subsequent filing of the reprimand will be in accordance with the provisions of AR 600-37.


DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

2. The applicant was a drunk driver. In accordance with applicable Army regulations, he was given an administrative MOR. The MOR was filed in the performance portion of his OMPF.

3. The applicant's career was nearly ended when he was given a DA-imposed bar to reenlistment under the QMP based upon the MOR. He successfully appealed the bar. He was also successful in getting the DASEB to transfer the MOR to his R-fiche.

4. Drunk driving is a serious offense. In FY2000, 57 soldiers died in privately-owned vehicle accidents; alcohol was a contributing factor in many of these fatalities. The Board feels that the alcohol-related MOR's should not be expunged from a soldier's record; however, the Board concurs with the DASEB action to remove the MOR to the applicant's R-fiche where it will not be readily available for review during routine personnel actions, but will remain a part of his record.

5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__inw___ __kan___ __rtd___ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2002071762
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20020627
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 134.0100.0002
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074333C070403

    Original file (2002074333C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: That a general officer memorandum of reprimand (GOMOR), dated 18 July 2000, be transferred to the restricted portion (R-Fiche) of his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). On 2 May 2002, the ABCMR received the applicant's request for correction of his records, dated 23 March 2002. The Commanding General, after reviewing the applicant’s request to have the GOMOR filed in his R-fiche, deemed it appropriate to file the memorandum on the performance portion of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002079840C070215

    Original file (2002079840C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s unit, battalion, and brigade commanders, after reviewing the applicant’s rebuttal letter, all recommended that the GOMOR be filed in the P-Fiche portion of the applicant’s OMPF. On 5 December 2001, the applicant was notified that the DASEB had deliberated on his petition to remove the GOMOR, dated 10 March 2000, from the P-Fiche portion of his OMPF, and after careful consideration had denied his request. The DASEB case summary indicated, in effect, that the applicant’s...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013064

    Original file (20060013064.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his Reenlistment (RE) Code be changed from RE-3 to RE-1 and that a Letter of Reprimand (LOR) [sic] be removed from his official military personnel file (OMPF). He also states that he did not know he was able to request this change until 31 August 2006. The applicant's military records show he enlisted in the Regular Army, in pay grade E-1, on 14 October 1992, for 3 years.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9710731

    Original file (9710731.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. After reviewing the applicant’s rebuttal, the imposing authority directed that the LOR be filed in the applicant’s OMPF and Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ). Inasmuch as the applicant has failed to show that an error or injustice exists in his case, the LOR should remain in his OMPF as presently filed.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050009267C070206

    Original file (20050009267C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that a memorandum of reprimand imposed by a general officer (GOMOR) and associated documents be expunged from the restricted portion of his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). The applicant acknowledged the GOMOR and provided a rebuttal in which he maintained that he was not intoxicated under German law because his blood alcohol content (BAC) was only .054 at 0036 hours and .060 at 0038 hours and that German law provided that a BAC of .080 was considered evidence...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003083656C070212

    Original file (2003083656C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: The record of this NJP is filed on the applicant's R fiche.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073126C070403

    Original file (2002073126C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board considered the following evidence: He provides three letters of support dated 4 March, 18 April, and 23 April 2002; the court document showing his case was dismissed without prejudice; the Department of the Army Suitability Evaluation Board (DASEB) packet; and his HQDA QMP bar to reenlistment appeal packet as supporting evidence. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by transferring the GOMOR issued to the applicant on 15 January 1997,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077764C070215

    Original file (2002077764C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 190-5 (Motor Vehicle Traffic Supervision) provides that soldiers will be issued an administrative letter of reprimand for alcohol related driving incidents in the following circumstances: When there is a conviction for driving while intoxicated or driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs; a refusal to take a properly requested blood, urine or breath test; when the individual was driving or in physical control of a vehicle on post with a BAC of .10 or off post with a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078666C070215

    Original file (2002078666C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was not convicted of DUI, but the GOMOR was filed in his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) prior to the court action. On 26 May 1996, the DASEB denied the applicant’s request to transfer the GOMOR to his R-fiche. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080743C070215

    Original file (2002080743C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    When the police officer botched the first test the applicant asked that Captain (CPT) G____, who was known to already be in the building, be allowed to witness the test, but the police officer recorded the incident as a refusal. He also recommends that the GOMOR be removed. There is no evidence that the applicant was ever charged with refusing to take a breath test.