| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. G. E. Vandenberg | Analyst |
| Mr. Raymond V. O'Connor, Jr. | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Stanley Kelley | Member | |
| Mr. Harry B. Oberg | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his narrative reason for discharge be changed to medical.
APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that he was suffering from a psychiatric condition that was not properly treated while he was on active duty. He submits a copy of a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Rating Decision, dated 7 December 2000, which granted him service connection for post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The applicant states that at no time was he a shirker.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show that:
The applicant was inducted on 16 February 1968 and completed basic combat training and advanced individual training. He enlisted in the Regular Army August 1969 while stationed in Korea.
On 29 December 1969, the applicant was found guilty by a special court-martial (SPCM) of being absent without leave (AWOL) for 20 days.
On 6 September 1970 the applicant was apprehended by civil authorities and returned to military control on 21 September 1970. He was held in confinement until 6 October 1970, when a second SPCM found him guilty of misappropriation of an automobile and 4 days AWOL.
The applicant was afforded medical and psychiatric evaluations. The psychiatric evaluation, conducted 26 October 1970, found the applicant's behavior normal. He was found to be able to tell right from wrong and to adhere to the right. He met the medical retention standards of Army Regulation 40-501 and was cleared for any administrative or disciplinary action deemed appropriate.
On 6 November 1970, his command initiated discharge action under Section I, paragraph 6a, Army Regulation 635-212, for unfitness. The recommendation for discharge cited incidents for which the applicant had been court-martialed as the reason for the discharge. It described the applicant as having a negative attitude toward the military, lack of self-motivation. The applicant expressed a desire to get out of service by the most expedient means possible and that he would most likely continue to go AWOL if he were retained.
After consultation with military counsel the applicant acknowledged and waived his right to be represented by counsel, to submit a written statement on his own behalf, and to have a hearing before a board of officers. He acknowledged he had been advised of and understood his rights under the Uniform Code of Military Justice, that he could receive an undesirable discharge which would deprive him of many or all of his benefits as a veteran, that he could expect to experience substantial prejudice in civilian life if he received an under other than honorable conditions characterization of service.
On 18 November 1970, the discharge authority approved the separation under Army Regulation 635-212 and directed that the applicant receive an Undesirable Discharge Certificate.
The applicant was discharged under Army Regulation 635-212 with a separation program number (SPN) of 386, unfitness – established pattern of shirking. His characterization of service was under conditions other than honorable. He had 2 years, 7 months, and 3 days of creditable service with 61 days lost due to AWOL and confinement.
The applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board and was granted an upgrade of his characterization of service to under honorable conditions on 14 April 1980. The ADRB did not deem it appropriate to change his narrative reason for discharge.
The applicant submits a copy of a 7 December 2000 VA rating decision which granted him entitlement to a 70% disability rating for PTSD effective 30 June 1997.
Army Regulation 635-212, in effect at the time, set forth the basic authority for the elimination of enlisted personnel. Paragraph 6a of the regulation provided, in pertinent part, that an individual was subject to separation for unfitness because of frequent incidents of a discreditable nature with civil or military authorities; an established pattern of shirking; and an established pattern of dishonorable failure to pay just. When separation for unfitness was warranted an undesirable discharge was normally considered appropriate.
Army Regulation 40-501, paragraph 3-3b(1), as amended, provides that for an individual to be found unfit by reason of physical disability; he must be unable to perform the duties of his office, grade, rank or rating.
Army Regulation 635-40, paragraph 1-2, provided that no enlisted member may be referred for physical disability processing when action has been or will be taken to separate him or her for unfitness, except when the officer exercising general court-martial jurisdiction determines that the disability was the cause or substantial contributing cause of the misconduct, or that circumstances warrant physical disability processing in lieu of administrative processing. A copy of the signed decision of the general court-martial authority directing physical disability processing will be included with the records.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, and applicable law and regulations it is concluded:
1. In the absence of evidence that at the time of the discharge the applicant was so impaired by mental, emotional, psychological or psychiatric problems as to be unable to tell right from wrong and adhere to the right, the diagnosis of PTSD, 30 years after his discharge, does not demonstrate an error or injustice in the discharge.
2. Although the term shirking was not specifically used, the description of the applicant's attitude and expressions of intent to continue to avoid his duties and military obligations describes shirking.
3. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
| CASE ID | AR2002071329 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20020902 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 108.01 |
| 2. | 110.02 |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040009190C070208
Jeanette R. McCants | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. During his first Vietnam tour the applicant was advanced to pay grade E- 4 in April 1969. While PTSD was not recognized as a specific illness at the time of the applicant's separation from the service, the fact that an individual might not be fit for further military service because of psychosis, psychoneurosis, or neurological disorders was outlined in...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004592
On 7 October 1970, the applicant's unit commander recommended that he be required to appear before a board of officers to consider his separation from the Army under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212. There were no medical records available to the Board and the applicant provided no medical records. Additionally, as stated in Army Regulation 635-212, when separation for unfitness was warranted an undesirable discharge was normally considered appropriate.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002066705C070402
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 29 April 1970, the unit commander recommended discharge for unfitness with issuance of a General Discharge Certificate. On 15 June 1970, the separation authority approved the discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212, for unfitness and directed that the applicant be issued an Undesirable Discharge Certificate.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067534C070402
On 26 October 1971, the separation authority approved the recommendation for discharge and directed that he be furnished a General Discharge Certificate. There is no evidence in the available records, and the applicant has provided no evidence, to show that he was diagnosed with a PTSD type illness prior to his discharge. The letter provided by the physician from the DVA stated that the applicant was diagnosed as having PTSD, chronic, with a GAF of 40.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082054C070215
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 15 July 1968 the Army Discharge Review Board denied the applicant request to upgrade his discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050006954C070206
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 10 January 2006 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20050006954 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. He further states that his discharge was upgraded under the Department of Defense Special Discharge Review Program (DOD-SDRP) but was not affirmed. Evidence shows that the applicant was properly and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040003367C070208
His DD Form 214 shows that he was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635- 212 by reason of unfitness with an undesirable discharge and with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. There is no medical evidence of record that shows the applicant had any illness or medical problem prior to his discharge on 21 September 1971. Evidence shows that the applicant was properly and equitably discharged in accordance with the regulations in effect at...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018638
He states he was never offered counsel at the time of his discharge. On 31 July 1970, after consulting with counsel, he acknowledged the proposed action to separate him from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212 (Personnel Separations - Discharge - Unfitness and Unsuitability). The evidence of record also shows he stated that he felt negatively towards the Army and he would continue to go AWOL if not discharged.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001492
On 14 December 1968, an Army psychiatrist issued a psychiatric evaluation based on a request from the applicant's commander. On 14 February 1969, his commander recommended his discharge for unfitness under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212, paragraph 6a(4) (an established pattern for shirking), for the reasons stated above and recommended the issuance of an undesirable discharge. The evidence of record does not support the applicant's request for an upgrade of his undesirable...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002893
He completed 1 year, 8 months, and 2 days of active military service. On 11 February 1975 and 19 October 1982, the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) denied the applicant's request for an upgrade of his discharge. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.