Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071226C070402
Original file (2002071226C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 1 October 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002071226

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Jessie B. Strickland Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Raymond V. O’Connor, Jr. Chairperson
Ms. Margaret K. Patterson Member
Mr. Arthur A. Omartian Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: That he be promoted to the rank of major.

APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that he was seriously wounded in combat in 1942 and over the next 4 years, spent 14 months in the hospital. He goes on to state that he was told if he finished the Advanced Infantry Course, he would be eligible for promotion to the next grade. He completed the course; however, the course was too severe for his condition and before he could be promoted, he was hospitalized again. He continues by stating that he was placed on limited duty at Camp Beale, California, and was again hospitalized at Oakland Regional Hospital, where he was medically retired as a captain in 1946. He also states that he signed some promotion documents once, but nothing ever came from it. He also states that he was commissioned with two other officers who advanced to the ranks of brigadier general and colonel, neither of which were wounded. He further states that he does not desire the monetary change, but desires it to make his family happy because they think he earned it.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

He enlisted in the Wisconsin Army National Guard (WIARNG) on 11 September 1933 and advanced to the rank of first sergeant on 4 March 1940. He was commissioned as a second lieutenant in the WIARNG on 16 August 1940. He was inducted into Federal Service on 15 October 1940, as an infantry second lieutenant with his WIARNG unit. It appears that his unit was mobilized to Camps Beauregard, and Livingston in Louisiana, and that he was promoted to the rank of first lieutenant on 29 August 1941. He and his unit departed the United States for the Southwest Pacific Theater of Operations on 20 April 1942, with him in command of the company. He was promoted to the rank of captain on 12 September 1942 and was seriously wounded in New Guinea on 5 December 1942. He was medically evacuated initially to Australia and then to the United States.

It appears that he was hospitalized from 5 December 1942 until 14 September 1943 and he attended and completed the Infantry Officer Advance Course at Fort Benning, Georgia, from 19 December 1943 to 21 March 1944. He was transferred to Fort McClellan, Alabama, on 23 March 1944 and was hospitalized again on 11 April 1944. In July 1944, he was transferred to Camp Beale, California, where he remained until he was retired by reason of physical disability, in the rank of captain, on 13 January 1946. At the time of his retirement, he had an efficiency index rating of 38.1.

A review of his records failed to show any indication that he was recommended for or was eligible for promotion at the time of his separation. However, his records contain a message dated 31 January 1962, from the Commanding General of Sixth Army in San Francisco, California, addressed to The Adjutant General of the Army (TAG) requesting verification if the applicant was eligible for promotion to major at the time of his retirement. The response from TAG indicates that the applicant was properly retired in the highest grade he held while on active duty and that he was not entitled to be retired in a higher grade.

War Department Circular 140, dated 15 May 1946, provided for the promotion of officers on relief from active duty (also known as terminal leave promotions). It stated, in pertinent part, that officers who had served 24 months time in grade on active duty as a captain since 16 September 1940 and who attained a minimum efficiency index of 40, were eligible for promotion to the rank of major, coincident with processing for relief from active duty. Promotions were made on the date of departure from the headquarters announcing the promotion, or on the date of departure from Army hospitals in cases of those officers separated from service by reason of physical disability. The provisions for terminal leave promotions were terminated on 31 December 1947, for all personnel except those who had obtained the time-in-grade and efficiency index requirements by 30 June 1947.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

2. The War Department Circular that announced terminal leave promotions was not published until 5 months after he was retired. While the provisions of the circular did apply to the applicant, he was not eligible for promotion to the rank of major by virtue of not meeting the minimum efficiency index of 40. Accordingly, he was properly retired in the rank of captain, the highest rank he served in while on active duty.

3. The Board has noted the applicant’s contentions and while the Board appreciates the applicant’s service and the sacrifices he made for our country, it finds no basis to grant him a promotion that he and others in similar circumstances were not eligible to receive.

4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___ao___ ___rvo __ __mkp___ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2002071226
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED YYYYMMDD
TYPE OF DISCHARGE (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION (DENY)
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1.131.0800 318/TERLVPROM
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001211

    Original file (20120001211.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the son of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of the FSM's WD AGO Form 53-98 (Military Record and Report of Separation Certificate of Service) to show his rank as captain (CPT). Promotions would be effective the date the officer departed active duty. There is no evidence in the available record to show the FSM was promoted above the grade of 1LT.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9609077aC070209

    Original file (9609077aC070209.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He states, in effect, that he just recently learned that officers released at the conclusion of World War II were eligible for a terminal leave promotion. Documents provided by the applicant together with the pertinent instructions from War Department Circular 140 indicates that he had a an efficiency index and the requisite time in grade that made him eligible for a relief from active duty promotion to the next higher grade upon his separation from active duty on 25 December 1945. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004020

    Original file (20120004020.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his military service records to show he was promoted to major (MAJ). The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. At this late date there is no evidence in the available records and the applicant has not provided evidence that shows he was eligible for promotion to major.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074646C070403

    Original file (2002074646C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that he be granted a terminal leave promotion from captain (CPT) to major (MAJ). War Department Circular 140, in effect at the time, provided the Army’s policy for the promotion of officers upon relief from active duty (REFRAD). As permitted by the Army policy in effect at the time, absent the rating or evaluation forms necessary to establish the applicant’s efficiency index, the Board elects to accept his application to the Board as the applicant’s...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060563C070421

    Original file (2001060563C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He goes on to state that the Board did not have evidence at the time to show that his promotion recommendation was processed to completion; however, he has found the documents to show otherwise and submits them with his application. On 11 June 1943, a revision of tables of organization (TO&E) was published by Headquarters, U.S. Army Forces in the Far East which provided, in effect, that recommendations for promotion of medical corps officers from the grade of first lieutenant to captain may...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9707462A

    Original file (9707462A.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that she be granted a terminal leave promotion from First Lieutenant to Captain and her report of separation be corrected accordingly. On 29 April 1946, the applicant was notified that she apparently had been eligible for promotion upon separation from the Service in accordance with War Department Circular 10, dated 11 January 1946 but since she had not been promoted coincident with her relief from active duty, she could be promoted by The Adjutant General...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9707462AC070209

    Original file (9707462AC070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that she be granted a terminal leave promotion from First Lieutenant to Captain and her report of separation be corrected accordingly. On 29 April 1946, the applicant was notified that she apparently had been eligible for promotion upon separation from the Service in accordance with War Department Circular 10, dated 11 January 1946 but since she had not been promoted coincident with her relief from active duty, she could be promoted by The Adjutant General...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071014C070402

    Original file (2002071014C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his military record be corrected to show his grade as captain. Promotions would be effective the date the officer departed active duty on terminal leave. Accordingly, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s records to show that he was promoted to the grade of captain effective on the date he entered terminal leave status – 7 September 1946.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-04073

    Original file (BC-2007-04073.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-04073 INDEX CODE: 131.03 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect that he served in the United States Army from 24 February 1943 to 2 August 1946, he was promoted to the grade of second lieutenant (2Lt) effective 13 February 1946, and he was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040007058C070208

    Original file (20040007058C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. The fact that the applicant may have held a specific position which he believes warranted promotion is not a basis to grant such promotion, nor would such promotion be effected by a Presidential Proclamation. Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or injustice now under consideration on 16 February 1946, the date of his separation from active duty.