| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Robert J. McGowan | Analyst |
| Ms. Karol A. Kennedy | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Thomas A. Pagan | Member | |
| Ms. Barbara J. Lutz | Member |
2. The applicant requests, in effect, that his retirement grade be adjusted from Major (MAJ/O-4) to Lieutenant Colonel (LTC/O-5).
3. The applicant states that a 2002 special selection board (SSB) selected him for promotion to LTC with a date of rank of 30 July 1998.
4. The applicant’s military records show that he served on active duty in the Regular Army from 27 May 1981 to 30 June 2001 when he was honorably separated with sufficient service for retirement. He was separated as a Major.
5. On 28 February 2002, the applicant was notified by the Chief, Promotions Branch, US Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM) that an SSB had selected him for promotion to the rank of LTC under the criteria and instructions established by the FY1998 selection board that adjourned in April 1998. He was given a promotion sequence number of 36.5 and a date of rank of 30 July 1998.
6. Army Regulation 600-8-24 (Officer Transfers and Discharges) prescribes officer transfer and discharge functions and states, in pertinent part, that a commissioned officer must serve on active duty 3 years in grade to retire in rank above major and below lieutenant general.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant was not selected for promotion to LTC by the FY1998 selection board and he retired as a Major on 30 June 2001. Subsequent to his retirement, he was selected for promotion to LTC by a 2002 SSB and, had he been on active duty, would have been given a date of rank of 30 July 1998.
2. The Board believes that, in the interest of justice and equity, the applicant's records should reflect that he was promoted to the rank of LTC effective 30 July 1998 and that he served in that grade until his retirement as an LTC on 30 June 2001.
3. The Board further believes that, had he been promoted effective 30 July 1998, the applicant would have remained on active duty an additional month until 31 July 2001 in order to retire in the grade of Lieutenant Colonel. The Board, therefore, feels that the time-in-grade requirements of AR 600-8-24 should be waived in this case.
4. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned was promoted to the rank of Lieutenant Colonel effective 30 July 1998 and that time-in-grade requirements are waived to permit him to retire as a Lieutenant Colonel on 30 June 2001.
2. That the individual concerned be paid all due back pay and allowances as a Lieutenant Colonel from 30 July 1998 through his retirement on 30 June 2001, and that his retired pay be adjusted to pay him as a Lieutenant Colonel from 1 July 2001.
BOARD VOTE:
__kak___ __tap___ __bjl___ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
Karol A. Kennedy
______________________
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2002071024 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20021029 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 131.0000 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001056353C070420
If the promotion board’s recommendations are approved after the MYSIG, the effective date of promotion and date of rank will be the date that the board’s recommendations are approved. The Chief, Promotions and Notification Branch, PERSCOM – St. Louis, provided an advisory opinion that the applicant’s promotion effective date, 30 August 2000, was correct, as that was the date he transferred from a major’s position in a TPU to the IRR and attained promotable status. Having attained his MYSIG...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016205
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 20 April 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090016205 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Based on his application, the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) corrected his records to show he retired in the rank/grade of LTC/O-5. Records also show he would have incurred an active duty service obligation of 2 years (i.e., 22 years of active service) and continue to receive consideration for promotion by Department of the Army promotion selection...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009418
The applicant provides: * Promotion consideration memorandum, dated 2 November 2004 * HRC Officer Promotion Memorandum, dated 19 April 2012 * Second Non-selection Memorandum, dated 12 April 1999 * Reassignment to the Retired Reserve orders, dated 21 May 1999 * Election of Option statement, dated 1 June 1999 * Extract of Army Regulation (AR) 600-8-104 (Military Personnel Information Management/ Records) * Extract of AR 135-155 (Promotion of Commissioned Officers and Warrant Officers Other...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021246
On 3 January 2012 in a response to the advisory opinion, the applicant stated he was supplying documentation to show he was assigned to an LTC position on 28 January 1998 and he had a current physical on file at that time. The evidence of record shows the 2003 SSB selected the applicant for promotion to LTC under the 1997 LTC APL board criteria. The Chief, Promotions, HRC, opined that if documentation was provided to verify the applicant was assigned to an LTC position prior to 29 May 1998...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011327
e. A Promotion as a Reserve Commissioned Officer of the Army memorandum, dated 19 May 1997, promoting him to MAJ effective 1 June 1997 with a DOR of 29 June 1991. f. A Promotion as a Reserve Commissioned Officer of the Army memorandum (Corrected Copy), dated 19 May 1997, promoting him to CPT effective 1 June 1997 with a DOR of 29 June 1991. g. A promotion congratulations letter for the rank of MAJ. h. The following orders issued by Headquarters, USAR Command: (1) Orders Number T-12-721225,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026100
The applicant requests, in effect, * education waivers with consecutive promotion corrections due to the findings of Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) Docket Number AR20070001144, dated 2 August 2007 * a 4-year extension of his mandatory removal date (MRD) to allow him to qualify for a 20-year nonregular retirement 2. On 2 August 2007, the ABCMR granted his request for correction of his records as follows: * determined his 19 April 1996 DA Form 5074-1-R was incorrect *...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007885
Had the SSBs considered the 2002 adjustment from the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR), "his records would have been promotable." e. Army Regulation 600-8-29 states promotion selection boards will base their recommendations on impartial consideration of all officers and an SSB will consider the record of the officer as it should have been considered by the original board. The evidence of record confirms the applicant was initially considered for promotion by the FY05...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016602
There were no provisions allowing for the continuation of members in a dual component status subsequent to their length of service retirement from active duty. It states that warrant officer and enlisted members of the Army are entitled, when their active service plus their service on the Retired List totals 30 years, to be advanced on the Retired List to the highest grade in which they served on active duty satisfactorily. Given the applicant never served on active duty in a commissioned...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014395
The applicant requests correction of his military records to show he was appointed as a chaplain in the rank/grade of captain (CPT)/O-3 effective 8 March 1998 with a date of rank of 23 May 1995; to adjust his effective date and date of rank for major (MAJ)/O-4 to 23 May 2002; and to have his records considered by a Special Selection Board (SSB) for promotion to lieutenant colonel (LTC)/O-5, under the 2007 criteria. The applicant requests correction of his military records to show he was...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060009952
His application was approved, and he was ordered to active duty in the AGR Program with a reporting date of 5 September 1995. Army Regulation 135-155 further provided that promotions would be made only on the recommendation of a promotion selection board. Because promotion boards are not permitted to disclose the reasons for non-selection for promotion, there is no record of why the applicant failed to be selected for promotion by the 1999 and 2000 LTC DA Reserve Components Selection...