Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070801C070402
Original file (2002070801C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 2 July 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002070801


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Wanda L. Waller Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. Karol A. Kennedy Chairperson
Mr. Arthur A. Omartian Member
Mr. Raymond J. Wagner Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)

FINDINGS :

1. The applicant has exhausted or the Board has waived the requirement for exhaustion of all administrative remedies afforded by existing law or regulations.


2. The applicant requests award of the Air Medal.

3. The applicant states that he flew over 20 combat missions during his service in Vietnam, but was never awarded the Air Medal.

4. The applicant’s military records show that he was inducted on 17 September 1969. He served as an infantry indirect fire crewman in Vietnam from 4 March 1970 through 19 January 1971 and was honorably released on 7 September 1971.

5. The applicant’s DD Form 214, which was authenticated in his own hand, does not show the Air Medal as an authorized award.

6. There are no orders for the Air Medal in the applicant’s service personnel records. There are no flight hours in the applicant’s service personnel records. Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) on the applicant’s DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show entitlement to the Air Medal.

7. There is no evidence the applicant received the first award of the Good Conduct Medal. There also is no evidence the applicant was disqualified by his chain of command from receiving the Good Conduct Medal. His records do not contain any adverse information and he received conduct and efficiency ratings of “excellent” throughout his service.

8. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) lists the unit awards received by units serving in Vietnam. This document shows the unit, to which the applicant was assigned, was cited for award of the Valorous Unit Award for actions on 1 May 1970 to
29 June 1970 by Department of the Army General Orders Number 43, dated 1972. This award is not shown on his discharge document.

9. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) shows the applicant is entitled to award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation based on Department of the Army General Orders Number 55, dated 1971. This award is not shown on his discharge document.

10. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) also shows the applicant is entitled to award of the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation based on Department of the Army General Orders Number 55, dated 1971. This award is not shown on his discharge document.

11. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Air Medal is awarded in time of war for heroism and for meritorious achievement or service while participating in aerial flight. This award is primarily intended for personnel on flying status, but may also be awarded to those personnel whose combat duties require them to fly, for example personnel in the attack elements of units involved in air-land assaults against an armed enemy. As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.

12. U.S Army Vietnam (USARV) Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) provided, in pertinent part, guidelines for award of the Air Medal. It established that passenger personnel who did not participate in an air assault were not eligible for the award based upon sustained operations. It defined terms and provided guidelines for the award based upon the number and types of missions or hours. Twenty five Category I missions (air assault and equally dangerous missions) and accrual of a minimum of 25 hours of flight time while engaged in Category I missions was the standard established for which sustained operations were deemed worthy of recognition by an award of the Air Medal. However, the regulation was clear that these guidelines were considered only a departure point. Nothing created an entitlement to the award.

13. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service. Although there is no automatic entitlement to the Good Conduct Medal, disqualification must be justified.

CONCLUSIONS:

1. The Board considered the applicant’s contention that he flew over 20 combat missions during his service in Vietnam. However, there is no evidence of record available to the Board, and the applicant has provided no evidence, which supports this contention.

2. There is no evidence of record available to the Board, and the applicant has provided no evidence, which shows he was recommended for, awarded, or otherwise qualified for award of the Air Medal. Therefore, the Board determined there is insufficient evidence on which to base an award of the Air Medal in this case.

3. The applicant is entitled to the first award of the Good Conduct Medal based on completion of qualifying service from 17 September 1969 to 7 September 1971 ending with termination of a period of Federal military service. Therefore, the applicant is entitled to correction of his military records to show this award.

4. The applicant’s unit received the Valorous Unit Award, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation while he was assigned to it. Therefore, the applicant is entitled to correction of his military records to show these unit awards.

5. In view of the foregoing findings and conclusions, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s records, but only as recommended below.

RECOMMENDATION:

1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned was awarded the first award of the Good Conduct Medal, Valorous Unit Award, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation.

2. That so much of the application as is in excess of the foregoing be denied.

BOARD VOTE:

KAK___ AAO_____ RJW_____ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION




                  __Karol A. Kennedy________
                  CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID AR2002070801
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20020702
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION (GRANT)
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 107.0018
2. 107.0000
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080169C070215

    Original file (2002080169C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's DD Form 214 does not show the Air Medal or the Air Medal with "V" Device as authorized awards. Therefore, the applicant's DD Form 214 should be corrected to show three awards of the Air Medal (correctly known as the Air Medal with Numeral "3"). Therefore, the applicant is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show these unit awards.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007028

    Original file (20090007028.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's records do not contain general orders awarding him the Air Medal and item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of his DA Form 20 does not show award of the Air Medal. The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal; b. awarding the applicant the Army Good Conduct...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021270

    Original file (20090021270.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 for the period ending on 4 April 1972 shows the Aviation Badge, Vietnam Service Medal, Air Medal, Defense Distinguished Cross, Army Commendation Medal, Purple Heart, Vietnam Campaign Medal with "1960" Device, and Bronze Star Medal. Therefore, he should receive 6 additional awards of the Air Medal based on his combat missions by subtracting 25 hours from his total...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073439C070403

    Original file (2002073439C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Combat Medical Badge and four awards of the Air Medal (correctly known as the Air Medal with Numeral “4”). The applicant’s service personnel records contain 197th Infantry Brigade General Orders Number 213, dated 6 October 1971, show the applicant was awarded the first award of the Good Conduct Medal for the period 30 October 1968 through 29 October 1971. Army Regulation 600-8-22...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078598C070215

    Original file (2002078598C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provided an award certificate, dated 30 July 1970, which shows he received the Air Medal (Third through Twenty-Second Award) for meritorious achievement for the period 10 August 1969 to 20 June 1970. Evidence of record also shows the applicant received a second award of the Air Medal for heroism on 10 March 1970 in Vietnam. Notwithstanding the two award certificates for the Air Medal (Second Award) for heroism provided by the applicant, he has presented no orders which show...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005824

    Original file (20090005824.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Army Commendation Medal and additional awards of the Air Medal. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows the Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze service stars; however, the applicant participated in four campaigns during his assignment in Vietnam which entitles him to award of the Vietnam Service Medal with four bronze service stars. As a result, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050014830C070206

    Original file (20050014830C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    James R. Hastie | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of the applicant's DA Form 20 shows while serving in the Republic of Vietnam, he was assigned to the following units: a. The applicant's records show that he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012558

    Original file (20100012558.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 15 October 1970 (hereafter referred to as his DD Form 214) shows he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal, Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal, Air Medal with "V" Device, Army Commendation Medal with 1st oak leaf cluster (OLC), Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012352

    Original file (20130012352.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His 9 June 1967 and 9 February 1972 DD Forms 214 list his awards as the National Defense Service Medal, Army Aviator Badge, Good Conduct Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), Air Medal, Distinguished Flying Cross, and the Bronze Star Medal. It is appropriate to correct the applicant's records to show his award of the Air Medal as "Air Medal with Numeral 11 and "V" device. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001167

    Original file (20130001167.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The DA Forms 759 and 759-1 provided with this case, confirm the applicant flew 43 category-I missions, totaling 181 hours during his tour in the RVN. Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show these awards. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Air Medal for the period September 1970 - March 1971; b. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 2 June 1969...