| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Jessie B. Strickland | Analyst |
| Ms. Karol A. Kennedy | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Arthur A. Omartian | Member | |
| Mr. Raymond J. Wagner | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his discharge under other than honorable conditions be upgraded to a more favorable discharge.
APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that he was unaware that he could request an upgrade of his discharge and believes that he has paid for the mistake he made long enough.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
He enlisted in the United States Army Reserve (USAR) on 16 July 1975 for a period of 6 years. He was ordered to active duty for training on 18 September 1975, and was transferred to Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri, to undergo his training. He completed his training on 6 March 1976 and was honorably released from active duty. He was returned to his USAR Unit in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, for duty as a wheel vehicle mechanic.
In April 1976, the applicant began a series of unexcused absences from his unit’s scheduled drills and notices were sent to the applicant’s home address by Certified Mail, informing him of the consequences of unsatisfactory participation.
The applicant continued to miss his scheduled drills and on 18 November 1976, his commander notified him that he was initiating action to order him to active duty for unsatisfactory participation. The recommendation was approved and orders were published on 22 April 1977, ordering him to active duty at Fort Knox, Kentucky, on 7 June 1977, for a follow-on assignment to Fort Hood, Texas.
The applicant failed to report as ordered and was reported as absent without leave (AWOL) on 7 June 1977. He remained absent until he surrendered to military authorities in Milwaukee on 21 July 1977 and was transferred to Fort Carson, Colorado, where charges were preferred against him.
On 1 August 1977, after consulting with counsel, the applicant submitted a request for discharge for the good of the service, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial. In his request he indicated that he was making the request of his own free will, without coercion from anyone and that he was aware of the implications attached to his request. He also admitted that he was guilty of the charges against him or of lesser included offenses which authorized the imposition of a bad conduct or dishonorable discharge. He further elected to submit a statement in his own behalf whereas he contended that he had received his activation orders but just did not feel that his nerves would allow him to continue to serve in the Army and that it would be in the best interest of all concerned that he be released from the service. He also acknowledged that he had been counseled on the procedures for requesting an upgrade of his discharge from the Army Discharge Review Board and this Board and that he had been provided the information for doing so in writing.
The appropriate authority (a major general) approved his request for discharge on 19 August 1977 and directed that he be discharged under other than honorable conditions.
Accordingly, he was discharged under other than honorable conditions on 7 September 1977, under the provision of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial. He had served 1 year, 7 months and 9 days of total active service and had 43 days of lost time due to AWOL.
There is no evidence in the available records to show that he ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board’s 15-year statute of limitations.
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of the regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may at any time after charges have been preferred, submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. A condition of submitting such a request is that the individual concerned must admit guilt to the charges against them or of a lesser included offense which authorizes the imposition of a bad conduct or dishonorable discharge and they must indicate that they have been briefed and understand the consequences of such a request as well as the discharge they might receive. A discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The applicant’s voluntary request for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service, to avoid trial by court-martial, was administratively correct and in conformance with applicable regulations.
2. Accordingly, the type of discharge directed and the reasons therefore were appropriate under the circumstances.
3. After being afforded the opportunity to assert his innocence before a trial by court-martial, he voluntarily requested a discharge for the good of the service in hopes of avoiding a punitive discharge and having a felony conviction on his records. In doing so he admitted guilt to the charges against him. While he may now believe that he made the wrong choice, he should not be allowed to change his mind at this late date, especially considering his otherwise undistinguished record of service during such a short period of time.
4. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__kak___ ___ao___ __rjw____ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2002070787 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 2002/07/02 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | UOTHC |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 1977/09/07 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR635-200/ch10 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | Gd of svc |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 689 | 144.7000/a70.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016511
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests that his discharge under other than honorable conditions be upgraded to a general discharge. On 8 March 1977, the appropriate authority (a major general) approved his request for discharge and directed the applicant be given an under other than honorable conditions discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027868
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests that his discharge under other than honorable conditions be upgraded to an honorable discharge. On 22 March 1976 nonjudicial punishment (NJP) was imposed against him for failure to go to his place of duty (Guard Duty) and for driving while under the influence of alcohol.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011491
However, on the same day, he again went AWOL and remained absent in desertion until he was apprehended by civil authorities in Johnson City, Tennessee on 2 November 1977 and was returned to military control at Fort Knox, where charges were preferred against him for the AWOL charges. The appropriate authority (a major general) approved his request on 29 November 1977 and directed that he be discharged under other than honorable conditions. There is no evidence in the available records to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064419C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 22 March 1976, while serving in the pay grade of E-3, nonjudicial punishment (NJP) was imposed against him for being absent without leave from 1 March to 2 March 1976. There is no evidence in the available records to show that he ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board’s 15-year statute of limitations.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069737C070402
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. He was advanced to the pay grade of E-4 on 1 April 1974 and reenlisted with a waiver for 11 days of lost time on 31 July 1974, for a period of 3 years. The appropriate authority (a brigadier general) approved his request for discharge on 31 January 1977 and directed that he be discharged under other than honorable conditions.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017441
The applicant requests an upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions discharge to a fully honorable discharge. The DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) he was issued at the time shows he was discharged for the good of the service in lieu of a court-martial with a character of service of under other than honorable conditions. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026435
On 17 March 1977 after consulting with defense counsel, the applicant submitted a request for discharge for the good of the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial. His defense counsel signed the request for discharge attesting that the applicant had been advised of the effects of a discharge under other than honorable conditions and all of the applicant's rights had been explained to him. The...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060003676C070205
There is no evidence in the available records to show that he ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board’s 15-year statute of limitations. A condition of submitting such a request is that the individual concerned must admit guilt to the charges against them or of a lesser included offense which authorizes the imposition of a bad conduct or dishonorable discharge and they must indicate that they have been briefed and understand...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060005310C070205
The appropriate authority (a major general) approved his request on 23 March 1978 and directed that he be discharged under other than honorable conditions. The U.S. Court of Appeals, observing that applicants to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) are by statute allowed 15 years to apply there, and that this Board's exhaustion requirement (Army Regulation 15-185, paragraph 2-8), effectively shortens that filing period, has determined that the 3 year limit on filing to the Army Board for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014457
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). He also stated that he would continue to go AWOL if he was not discharged. The appropriate authority approved his request for discharge on 21 December 1981 and directed the applicant be given an under other than honorable conditions discharge.