| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Jessie B. Strickland | Analyst |
| Ms. Irene N. Wheelwright | Chairperson | |
| Ms. Kathleen A. Newman | Member | |
| Mr. Richard T. Dunbar | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his general discharge be upgraded to honorable.
APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that he was extended past his original expiration of term of service (ETS) of February 1962, during the Cuban Missile Crisis and was court-martialed in April 1962 for being absent without leave (AWOL) for 1 day. He contends that he should have received an honorable discharge.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
He enlisted on 17 February 1959 for a period of 3 years, training as an armor crewman and assignment to Europe. On 11 August 1959, while attending his advanced individual training at Fort Knox, Kentucky, he was convicted by a summary court-martial of being AWOL from 6 August to 10 August 1959. He was sentenced to confinement at hard labor for 30 days (suspended), reduction to the pay grade of E-1 and a forfeiture of pay. He completed his training and was transferred to Germany on 23 September 1959.
He was convicted by a summary court-martial on 1 February 1961 of being disrespectful to a superior noncommissioned officer. He was sentenced to be reduced to the pay grade of E-1 and a forfeiture of pay.
On 1 August 1961, he was transferred to Fort Devens, Massachusetts and on 15 December 1961, he was involuntarily extended on active duty to 11 April 1962. His original ETS at the time was 16 February 1962.
On 3 April 1962, he was convicted by a summary court-martial of disobeying a lawful order of the commanding general, not to operate a motor vehicle on Fort Devens Military Reservation. He was sentenced to perform hard labor without confinement for 5 days, reduction to the pay grade of E-1 and a forfeiture of pay.
On 11 April 1962, he was released from active duty (REFRAD) under honorable conditions, due to the expiration of his term of service. He had served 3 years, 1 month and 21 days of total active service and was transferred to the United States Army Reserve Control Group to complete his statutory service obligation.
A review of his conduct and efficiency ratings shows that he was rated unsatisfactory on at least two occasions, good on two occasions and fair on one occasion. His last ratings were unsatisfactory conduct and good efficiency ratings. The highest rank he ever attained was the rank of private first class. He was reduced in grade on six occasions (three times by court-martial convictions and three times by nonjudicial punishment).
There is no indication in the available records to show that the applicant ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board’s 15-year statute of limitations.
Army Regulation 635-200, in effect at the time, provided the criteria for determining the characterization of a discharge. It provides, in pertinent part, that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and is conditioned upon proper military behavior and proficient performance of duty during the member’s current enlistment. A general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions of an individual whose military record is not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. A member’s service may be characterized as general by the commanding officer authorized to take such action. In doing so, the commander must consider the record in its entirety for the period of service in question before making a determination.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
2. The applicant’s service was properly characterized in accordance with the applicable regulations in effect at the time and the applicant has failed to show through the evidence submitted with his application or the evidence of record that his service warranted a fully honorable characterization of service.
3. The Board has noted the applicant’s contentions; however, they are not supported by the evidence of record and are not sufficiently mitigating to warrant relief when compared to his disciplinary record and overall record of undistinguished service.
4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
_rtd_____ ___inw __ ___kan__ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2002070724 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 2002/06/27 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | GD |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 1962/04/11 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR635-200 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | Ets |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 455 | 144.0300/A03.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004560
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 7 November 2013 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130004560 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Army Regulation 635-204, in effect at the time, provided that a Soldier will be given a dishonorable discharge pursuant only to an approved sentence of a general court-martial empowered to impose a dishonorable discharge. Records show the applicant satisfactorily completed training, was promoted to SP4/E-4, and he was honorably discharged to reenlist in the RA after...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010981
However, his record contains a copy of his DD Form 214 which shows he was discharged on 22 November 1961 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208 by reason of unfitness with a character of service as under other than honorable conditions. ____________X____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140010981 3 ARMY BOARD...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078823C070215
He completed 2 years, 11 months and 2 days of total active service and he had approximately 84 days of lost time due to AWOL and confinement. On 18 February 1963, the Army Discharge Review Board denied the applicant’s request for an upgrade of his discharge. However, there is no evidence of record that shows that he was an alcoholic while he was in the Army.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | AR20050015776C070206
John Heck | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant states that he should have received an honorable discharge for his service because he served honorably. There is no evidence in the available records to show that he applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board’s 15-year statute of limitations.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068734C070402
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his records be corrected to show he was discharged by reason of physical disability. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's available military records show:
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002904
His records contain his DA Form 24 (Service Record). He was given a dishonorable discharge pursuant to a general court-martial empowered to adjudge such a discharge. His conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable laws and regulations and his discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which he was convicted.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070006408
The DD Form 214 the applicant was issued at the time of his discharge confirms he was discharged and his characterization of service was under other than honorable conditions. On 14 August 1981, the Army Discharge Review Board denied the applicant's request for an upgrade of his discharge. Evidence of record shows that the applicant went AWOL 7 times, was confined twice, deserted once, tried by a Summary Court-Martial twice, and tried by a Special Court-Martial once.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028502
The applicant's military records show he enlisted in the Regular Army, in pay grade E-1, on 1 June 1959, for 3 years. On 23 January 1962, the applicant's unit commander recommended the applicant be eliminated from military service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208 (Personnel Separations - Discharge - Unfitness). Accordingly, he was discharged in pay grade E-1 on 17 May 1962, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208, with a general discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004800
When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. Evidence of record shows the applicant had been previously convicted by an SPCM and sentenced to hard labor. After a thorough review of the applicants record and issues the Board found no basis for granting clemency in this case.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014003
On 25 July 1961, the separation authority approved the findings and directed that the applicant be discharged with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. However, on 3 August 1961, a request for discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-206 (Personnel Separations-Discharge-Misconduct (Fraudulent Entry, Conviction by Civil Court, AWOL, Desertion) was initiated based on concealment of prior service. Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Active Duty Enlisted...