| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. G. E. Vandenberg | Analyst |
| Mr. John N. Slone | Chairperson | |
| Ms. Sherri V. Ward | Member | |
| Mr. Melvin H. Meyer | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his discharge be upgraded.
APPLICANT STATES: In effect, his misconduct that led to his discharge was the result of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). He states that he returned from Vietnam with PTSD, that the flashbacks and nightmares are what caused him to commit the offenses that led to his discharge. He states that he has diabetes as a result of exposure to Agent Orange. He states that following his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rating he was told to apply. He submits his VA rating decision to substantiate his case.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
The applicant entered active duty on 17 September 1965. He completed basic combat training and advanced individual training with award of the military occupational specialty (MOS) 63B (Clerk). He reenlisted on 5 April 1967 and on 18 September 1969 and had served for in Vietnam from 26 November 1969 though 7 November 1970.
On 14 February 1972, civil authorities arrested the applicant for breaking and entering. He was placed in pre-trial confinement until 29 February 1972 when he was found guilty and placed on 5 years probation.
A 3 May 1972 check of the Federal Bureaus of Investigation (FBI) files showed that the applicant had concealed a pre-service criminal record.
On 5 June 1972, the applicant was charged with intent to defraud by writing 31 checks in the amount of $1550 while knowingly having insufficient funds under Article 123, UCMJ.
On 7 June 1972, the applicant was offered and declined punishment under the provisions of Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ). His case was referred for trial by court-martial and he was placed in pre-trial confinement.
Although the discharge packet is not of record, the record indicates that the applicant requested to be discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trail by court-martial under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10.
The applicant was discharged on 25 September 1972 with an undesirable discharge. His military occupational specialty (MOS) at the time of his discharge was 71H (Legal Clerk). He had 6 years, 8 months, and 18 days of creditable service with 107 days lost due to confinement.
The Army Discharge Review Board denied upgrade of his characterization of service on 15 May 1979.
The applicant submits a 29 August 1996 VA rating decision showing he is suffering from PTSD but denying him service connection based upon the characterization of his last period of service.
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individual's admission of guilt. Although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, a discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate. However, at the time of the applicant's separation the regulation provided for the issuance of an undesirable discharge.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, and advisory opinion(s), it is concluded:
1. The applicant's voluntary request for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service, to avoid trial by court-martial, was administratively correct and in conformance with applicable regulations. There is no indication that the request was made under coercion or duress. The service is appropriately characterized by the applicant's overall service.
2. Absent convincing evidence that, at the time of the discharge or the behavior that led to the discharge, the applicant was so impaired by psychiatric, psychological, mental, or emotional problems that he could not both tell right from wrong and adhere to the right, the PTSD issue does nothing to demonstrate an error or an injustice in the discharge.
3. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
| CASE ID | AR2002070688 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20021119 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 144.61 |
| 2. | 144.92 |
| 3. | 144.9323 |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091471C070212
However, at the time of the applicant's separation the regulation provided for the issuance of an undesirable discharge. The applicant's records indicate that the Army Discharge Review Board denied the applicant's petition to upgrade his discharge in 1974 and that this Board denied his petition to upgrade his discharge in 1975. In 1981 the Army Discharge Review Board again denied his request to upgrade his discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002081041C070215
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: The evidence of record confirms that the applicant was in pre-trial confinement from 14 through 22 June 1972, that he was dropped from the rolls of his organization on 7 June 1972 and 15 March 1973, and that he was issued an Undesirable Discharge Certificate in accordance with the governing regulation in effect...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017638
On an unspecified date, the applicant requested a discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10 (Discharge for the Good of the Service). He was subsequently discharged on 8 December 1972, with service characterized as under conditions other than honorable in accordance with the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service with SPN 246, and issued an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. The...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060095C070421
The Board considered the following evidence: On 12 November 1980, the Army Discharge Review Board denied the applicant’s request for an upgraded discharge. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088478C070403
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 25 November 2003 DOCKET NUMBER: AR2003088478 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007677
The applicant states his tour of duty in Vietnam led to post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) along with other personal problems. Her statement shows she met him just after his return from Vietnam. The evidence of record does not support the applicant's request for reconsideration of his request to upgrade his discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068421C070402
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Information available to the Board indicates that the applicant’s original petition to the Board was denied on 12 February 1975. A 17 January 1973 clinical record prepared at Kimbrough Army Hospital at Fort Meade, Maryland, shows that the applicant was admitted to the hospital on 17 December 1972 and discharged from that hospital on 20 December 1972.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005934
The applicant requests that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 17 October 1972, the applicant was assigned to the 3rd Adjutant General Company, 3rd Infantry Division, located in Schweinfurt, FRG. On 23 September 1983, the Army Discharge Review Board denied the applicant's request for an upgrade of his discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004701
Following consultation with legal counsel, he requested discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10, for the good of the service - in lieu of trial by court-martial. On 23 January 1973, the separation authority approved the applicant's request for discharge and directed issuance of a General Discharge Certificate. Additionally, there is no evidence which shows his misconduct was a direct result of the alleged condition.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073414C070403
The Board considered the following evidence: At a personal appearance hearing on 12 May 1980, the Army Discharge Review Board denied the applicant's request to upgrade his discharge. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded: