Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070639C070402
Original file (2002070639C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 13 June 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002070639


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Wanda L. Waller Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. Celia L. Adolphi Chairperson
Ms. Barbara J. Ellis Member
Mr. Donald P. Hupman Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
                  Records

         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
                  advisory opinion, if any)

APPLICANT REQUESTS: Reconsideration of his earlier appeal to correct his military records by awarding him the Purple Heart.

APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that he is entitled to the Purple Heart because he injured his left knee while serving in Korea in 1950.

NEW EVIDENCE OR INFORMATION: Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the Proceedings prepared to reflect the consideration of Docket Number AR2001060576 by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) on 20 December 2001.

The applicant submits Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) examination results, dated 23 October 2001. This examination reports that while the applicant was serving in Korea in 1950, during monsoon weather and heavy rains, he was on top of a truck loaded with 30 caliber boxes of ammunition and that the truck flipped off the road and the boxes of ammunition fell on his left knee and tore it open.

The applicant also submits a DVA Rating Decision, dated 23 October 1997, which shows that he was granted service connection (zero percent) for left knee condition.

The applicant’s DVA documentation was not previously considered by the ABCMR. Therefore, it is new evidence which will be considered by the Board.

There is no evidence in the available records which shows the applicant was wounded or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action.

The applicant’s DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States), which was authenticated in his own hand, does not show the Purple Heart as an authorized award. Item 29 (Wounds Received as a Result of Action with Enemy Forces) on his DD Form 214 shows the entry, “NA” [not applicable].

The applicant’s WD AGO Form 24 (Service Record) does not show entitlement to the Purple Heart and Section 8 (Wound Received Through Enemy Action) on his WD AGO Form 24 is blank.

Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result


of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

Army Regulation 15-185 sets forth the policy and procedures for the ABCMR. It provides that, if a request for reconsideration is received within one year of the prior consideration and the case has not been previously reconsidered, it will be resubmitted to the Board if there is evidence that was not in the record at the time of the Board’s prior consideration. This includes but is not limited to any facts or arguments as to why relief should be granted. The staff of the Board is authorized to determine whether or not such evidence has been submitted.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. The applicant provided DVA documentation which states that he injured his left knee in a truck accident.

2. There is no evidence that competent medical authority determined the injuries sustained by the applicant in the truck accident were the result of hostile action.

3. There is no evidence of record available to the Board, and the applicant has provided no evidence, which shows he was wounded or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action during the Korean War.

4. After review of all the evidence in this case and the latest submissions, this Board also concluded the applicant has presented no argument or evidence which is sufficient to reverse the previous decision rendered by the ABCMR in AR2001060576 on 20 December 2001.

5. In review of all the evidence in this case, this Board has determined that there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Purple heart in this case.

6. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE
:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

CLA____ BJE_____ DPH_____ DENY APPLICATION



         Carl W. S. Chun

Director, Army Board for Correction
         of Military Records



INDEX

CASE ID AR2002070639
SUFFIX
RECON Yes – Originally boarded on 20011220
DATE BOARDED 20020613
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 107.0015
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021438

    Original file (20110021438.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of the records of her deceased father, a former service member (FSM), to show award of the Purple Heart. The FSM's military records are not available to the Board for review. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057761C070420

    Original file (2001057761C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. However, there is no...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110008099

    Original file (20110008099.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    c. the applicant's available medical records do not show he suffered a combat wound or injury or that he was treated for a combat wound or injury. d. regrettably, notwithstanding the applicant's sincerity, in the absence of additional documentation that conclusively shows that the applicant sustained wounds or injuries as a result of hostile action, that he was treated by medical personnel for those wounds or injuries, and that this treatment was made a matter of official record, there is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080001088

    Original file (20080001088.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, as the widow of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of the FSM’s records to show award of the Purple Heart for injuries sustained during World War II. CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Evidence shows that the FSM’s records contain an administrative error which does not require action by the Board.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004103474C070208

    Original file (2004103474C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides a 1-page medical record from the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) dated 15 January 2004; a 1-page medical record from the DVA dated 21 January 2000; a 1-page medical record from the DVA dated 24 April 2003; an extract from his service medical records; a 3-page attachment to a DVA claim; a letter dated 6 March 1969; a letter addressed to the National Archives and Records Administration dated 26 October 1999; and his DD Form 214. In pertinent part, it states that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003949C070206

    Original file (20050003949C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. This regulation also provides that there is no statute of limitations on requests for award of the Purple Heart. There are no medical records that show the applicant was wounded, or treated for wounds, as a result of hostile action.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017554

    Original file (20130017554.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was wounded in combat and award of the Purple Heart. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. These medical records show no evidence of retained...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050014378C070206

    Original file (20050014378C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    This document shows that the proceedings of a Board of Medical Officers convened on 18 July 1944. Evidence of record shows that the applicant was injured as a result of an accident on 7 July 1944 when he suffered a fracture of his left tibia and fibula. There is no official documentary evidence in the applicant's military service records that supports the contention that he sustained a wound as a result of hostile action or was treated for such wound by a medical officer.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002066489C070402

    Original file (2002066489C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The applicant’s WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation) shows that he was inducted into the Army on 18 January 1943, entered on active duty on 25 January 1943, and served in the European Theater of Operations (ETO) during World War II. On 11 January 1996 in response to an inquiry from an MC, the Army Reserve Personnel Center at St. Louis informed the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120018342

    Original file (20120018342.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military records are not available to the Board for review. His available records do not show he sustained a concussion during World War II but even if they did, the change is only retroactive to 11 September 2001. d. Notwithstanding his sincerity, there is no evidence in his record that shows he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action or treated for such wounds. Regrettably, absent evidence which conclusively shows he sustained wounds or injuries as a result...