| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. W. W. Osborn, Jr. | Analyst |
| Ms. Celia L. Adolphi | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Melvin H. Meyer | Member | |
| Mr. John T. Meixell | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his uncharacterized entry level separation be changed to an honorable discharge.
APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that he should have been separated due to physical disability because he sustained a permanent back injury when washing pots and pans while on kitchen duty. He herniated three discs. After bed rest and physical therapy he returned to normal duty but re-aggravated his back condition. He could have stayed on light duty and received a medical discharge, but he was ostracized by his fellow soldiers and ridiculed by his superiors so he "opted for immediate discharge to seek service-connected disability with the Veterans Administration." He was told about this option by a headquarters sergeant who "felt badly about the way I was treated by my company commander and others in the chain of command." He was booted out of the Army with no respect at all for his service to the Nation, except from the VA. He submits copies of correspondence from the National Personnel Records Center explaining that he is not entitled to the National Defense Service Medal and from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) stating that he "is an honorably discharged veteran and has [a] service-connected disability evaluated at 100 percent."
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
The applicant enlisted and entered active duty on 14 April 1992 at the age of 21 years. He was separated on 1 September 1992 with an uncharacterized entry level separation
The details of his separation are not contained in the available records. There are no available medical records.
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 11, paragraph 5-31 of that regulation, in effect at the time, provided, in pertinent part, for the separation of personnel because of unsatisfactory performance or conduct (or both). This policy applied to individuals who had demonstrated that they were not qualified for retention because they could not adapt socially or emotionally to military life, or because they lacked the aptitude, ability, motivation or self discipline for military service, or that they had demonstrated characteristics not compatible with satisfactory continued service.
Paragraph 3-9 of the regulation specifies that soldiers who are within the first 180 days of their enlistments when separation processing is started will normally receive an uncharacterized entry level separation. The only authorized exceptions are in those cases where an under other than honorable conditions discharge is authorized and or warranted or when the Secretary of the Army determines on a case by case basis that an honorable discharge is warranted by unusual circumstances involving the individual's personal conduct and performance of duty. However, such honorable discharges may be applied only in cases involving changes in service obligation, convenience of the Government and secretarial plenary authority.
Title 10, United States Code, chapter 61, provides disability retirement or separation for a member who is physically unfit to perform the duties of his office, rank, grade or rating because of disability incurred while entitled to basic pay.
Army Regulation 40-501, paragraph 3-3b(1), as amended, provides that for an individual to be found unfit by reason of physical disability, he must be unable to perform the duties of his office, grade, rank or rating.
Army Regulation 635-40, paragraph 2-2b, as amended, provides that when a member is being separated by reason other than physical disability, his continued performance of duty creates a presumption of fitness which can be overcome only by clear and convincing evidence that he was unable to perform his duties or that acute grave illness or injury or other deterioration of physical condition, occurring immediately prior to or coincident with separation, rendered the member unfit.
Title 38, United States Code, sections 310 and 331, permits the VA to award compensation for a medical condition which was incurred in or aggravated by active military service. The VA, however, is not required by law to determine medical unfitness for further military service. The VA, in accordance with its own policies and regulations, awards compensation solely on the basis that a medical condition exists and that said medical condition reduces or impairs the social or industrial adaptability of the individual concerned. Consequently, due to the two concepts involved, an individual's medical condition, although not considered medically unfitting for military service at the time of processing for separation, discharge or retirement, may be sufficient to qualify the individual for VA benefits based on an evaluation by that agency.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, it is presumed that the discharge proceedings were conducted in accordance with law and regulations applicable at the time. The uncharacterized separation is required by regulation since there is no available evidence to show that another type separation is warranted.
2. There is no available evidence that the applicant was physically unable to perform his duties due to a condition that was incurred or aggravated during the period of service.
3. The fact that the VA, in its discretion, has awarded the applicant a disability rating is a prerogative exercised within the policies of that agency. It does not, in itself, establish physical unfitness for Department of the Army purposes.
4. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
_CLA ___ __MHM__ ___JTM__ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2002070596 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20020905 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | UNCHAR |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 19920414 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR635-200, ch 11 . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | A29.00 |
| BOARD DECISION | (NC, GRANT , DENY, GRANT PLUS) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | A93.21 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011432
The applicant provides, in support of his request for reconsideration, copies of the Board's Record of Proceedings, dated 3 March 2009; Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rating decision, dated 26 November 1984; FB Form 90 (Record Fire Scorecard); DA Form 705 (Army Physical Readiness Test Scorecard); two DA Forms 4856 (General Counseling Form), dated 9 September and 6 October 1983; FB Form 6 (Trainee Discharge General Data Sheet), dated 19 October 1983; FB Form Letter 1 (Proposed Separation...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013283
The applicant requests correction of her entry-level separation to show she was medically discharged. Her records are void of any evidence and she has not provided any evidence showing: a. she completed any other period of active service between her release from BCT and when she was discharged from the USAR; b. she was denied access to JAG, filed an IG complaint and was told they didn't handle the case, or that she consulted the ADRB; or c. her former NCOIC forged her commander's signature...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060000902C070205
The applicant requests that her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show she was separated by reason of medical retirement (asthma with a 60 percent disability rating); to change her uncharacterized description of service to honorable; and to add her awards for marksmanship badges for the M16 rifle, the hand grenade, and the bayonet. On 7 July 2005, the VA awarded the applicant a 30 percent disability rating for her asthma. Medical...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1980-1989 | 8109050d
Consequently, due to the two concepts involved, an individual's medical condition, although not considered medically unfitting for military service at the time of processing for separation, discharge or retirement, may be sufficient to qualify the individual for VA benefits based on an evaluation by that agency. The law and regulations make it clear that to be separated for physical disability a soldier must be physically unable to perform duty and that the presence of a medical condition...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010468
It was recommended the applicant be separated from the service under the provisions of paragraph 5-11, Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations) based on his EPTS condition. Medical proceedings, regardless of the date completed, must establish that a medical condition was identified by an appropriate military medical authority within 6 months of the Soldier's initial entrance on active duty for the Regular Army that: (1) would have permanently or temporarily...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9605765C070209
On 5 December 1994 the applicant stated that he understood that he was not required to undergo a medical examination for separation, however he could request one. The applicant did not have any medically unfitting disability which required physical disability processing. The Army must find unfitness for duty at the time of separation before a member may be medically retired or separated.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009833
The applicant requests his reason for discharge be changed to physical disability. Title 38, U.S. Code, sections 1110 and 1131, permits the VA to award compensation for a medical condition which was incurred in or aggravated by active military service. The applicant has not provided and the record does not contain any evidence that he was unable to perform his duties because of injuries sustained while on active duty.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021692
He was honorably released from active duty on 4 February 2012 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 4, by reason of completion of required active service. The Army rates only conditions determined to be physically unfitting at the time of discharge which disqualify the Soldier from further military service. He does not state what specific physical or behavioral health condition made him medically unfit for military...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9607600C070209
APPLICANT STATES: In essence, that he served in combat in Vietnam; that he believes that his service during that period of time caused him to be unfit for military service; and that granting his request would provide him a Civil Service benefit. Army Regulation 635-40, paragraph 3-2b(2), provides that when a member is being separated by reason other than physical disability, his or her continued performance of assigned duty commensurate with his or her rank or grade until he or she is...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025547
The DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) he received shows he was discharged on 28 January 1993, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), paragraph 5-13, due to personality disorder. On 17 October 2008, the Army Discharge Review Board, having carefully reviewed all of the applicant's available records and the issues and documents he submitted, determined there were no mitigating factors that would merit an...