| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. William Blakely | Analyst |
| Mr. Stanley Kelley | Chairperson | ||
| Mr. John T. Meixell | Member | ||
| Mr. Thomas E. O’Shaughnessy, Jr. | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his reentry (RE) code of RE-4 be changed to a more favorable RE code and his character of service be upgraded.
APPLICANT STATES: In effect, he requests a correction and improvement in his RE-4 code and the character of his service. He explains that he served on active duty from 26 June 1981 through 16 December 1983, and was court-martialed in 1983. Subsequent to his court-martial he requested retraining, but was denied. He was never given a reason for this denial, and to this date is unsure why he was not given an opportunity to demonstrate his good conduct and ability to perform his job. In addition, he questions the validity of his separation document (DD Form 214) since he never signed the document. He indicates that subsequent to his separation, he chose to work in the airline industry and has worked for a reputable airline for over 13 years, where his work history reflects an excellent level of performance and good conduct. Considering these facts, he now requests that his RE-4 code be changed in order to allow him to enlist in the Reserves. He concludes by commenting that his level of maturity has increased greatly with age, and he is now ashamed of the outcome of his first period of service and it is his sincere desire to have the opportunity to serve again, even if on a part-time basis.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
He continuously served on active duty for 2 years, 3 months, and 15 days, from 26 June 1981 until 16 December 1983, at which time he was separated with a bad conduct discharge (BCD) as a result of a sentence imposed on him as a result of a conviction by a special court-martial.
The applicant’s records confirm that he was trained in, awarded, and served in military occupational specialty (MOS) 76C (Equipment Records and Parts Specialist). The highest rank he attained while serving on active duty was private first class/E-3, and his records document no other acts of valor, significant achievement, or service warranting special recognition.
On 12 April 1983, the applicant was convicted by a special court-martial of failure to repair, two specifications of disobeying a lawful command, and two specifications of disobeying a lawful order. The resultant sentence included a forfeiture of $382.00 per month for 4 months, confinement at hard labor for
4 months, and a BCD. The findings and the sentence were approved and affirmed, as confirmed in Special Court Martial Orders (SPCMO) Number 771, dated 5 December 1982, issued by the United States Army Correctional Activity, Fort Riley, Kansas. On 16 December 1983, he was discharged with a BCD accordingly, after completing a total of 2 years, 3 months, and 15 days of creditable active military service.
The separation document (DD Form 214) issued to the applicant on the date of his separation confirms that the authority for his discharge was Chapter 3, section IV, Army Regulation 635-200, and the reason for his separation was the result of court-martial. This document also verifies that based on the authority and reason for his discharge, the applicant was assigned a Separation Program Designator (SPD) code of JJD and a RE code of RE-4.
Army Regulation 635-5-1 (SPD Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. Based on the guidance provided in this regulation, the SPD code of JJD is the appropriate code to assign soldiers separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 3, section IV, by reason of a result of court-martial. Additionally, Table 2-3 (SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table), Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), establishes RE-4 as the proper reentry code to assign to soldiers separated for this reason.
Title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552 as amended does not permit any redress by the Army Board of Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) of the finality of a court-martial conviction and empowers the ABCMR to only change a discharge if clemency is determined to be appropriate.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, and it is concluded:
1. The Board notes the applicant’s contentions that the quality of his service prior to his court-martial conviction, the fact that he was not afforded the opportunity to be retrained, and his post service conduct and employment warrants a change in the character of his service and his assigned RE-4 code. However, it finds these factors are not sufficiently mitigating to warrant the requested relief.
2. By law, any redress by this Board of the finality of a court-martial conviction is prohibited. The Board is only empowered to change a discharge if clemency is determined to be appropriate to moderate the severity of the punishment imposed.
3. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant’s conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations in effect at the time and that his trial by court-martial was warranted by the gravity of the offenses with which he was charged. Further, it confirms that as a result of being discharged by reason of court-martial, he was appropriately assigned an
RE-4 code based on regulatory guidance.
4. Notwithstanding the applicant’s contentions and desires, the Board finds that the type of discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which he was convicted and accurately reflects his overall record of service. In addition, it concludes that the assigned RE-4 code was and is still appropriate based on the authority and reason for his discharge. Therefore, the Board finds there is an insufficient basis to grant clemency in this case.
5. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
6. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
_SK___ ___JTM__ __TEO____ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2002069892 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 2002/06/06 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 100.0300 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060017429C071029
Rowland C. Heflin | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. He was convicted and served 94 days in civil confinement before being released to military authorities on 7 April 1988. After a thorough and comprehensive review of the applicant’s military service record, it is concluded that given his undistinguished record of military service, and the seriousness of the offenses for which he was convicted, clemency would...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010812C071029
Dale E. DeBruler | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The DD Form 214 issued to the applicant on the date of his separation, 9 July 1997, shows that he was separated with a BCD under the provisions of chapter 3, Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of court-martial. Title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552 as amended does not permit any redress by this Board of the finality of a court-martial conviction...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022556
The applicant requests: * his discharge be upgraded to honorable * the reason for his discharge be changed to "convenience of the government" * his reentry eligibility (RE) code be changed to RE-1 with a coordinating separation program number/designator code (SPD) 2. On 11 May 1987, he was discharged accordingly. g. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009581
The convening authority disapproved the request and ordered trial by a general court-martial. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. The conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable laws and regulations and the discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which he was convicted.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080039330
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). It states, in pertinent part, that the SPD code JJD is the appropriate code to assign to Soldiers separated under the provisions of Chapter 3, Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of court-martial. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130022405
Army Regulation 601-210 (Active and Reserve Components Enlistment Program) states that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The available evidence shows that the applicant was convicted by a general court-martial and he was discharged as a result of his court-martial conviction. He was assigned an RE code 4 and an SPD code of JJD based on his reason for discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024731
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The SPD code of JJD was the appropriate code for him based on the guidance provided in this regulation for Soldiers separating under the provisions of chapter 3, Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of as a result of court-martial, other. The evidence of record confirms that his separation processing was accomplished in accordance with the applicable regulations to include the RE-4 code assignment.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070004512C071029
It states, in pertinent part, that the SPD code of JJD is the appropriate code to assign to Soldiers separated under the provisions of chapter 3, Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of court-martial. The evidence of record confirms the applicant was separated under the provisions of chapter 3, Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of court- martial based on a SPCM conviction for distributing illegal drugs. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002755C070206
The applicant is not eligible to apply to the Army Discharge Review Board for upgrade of his discharge. The applicant's records clearly show he was tried and convicted by a general court-martial for various offenses against a female soldier. As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence provided which shows that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file this application within the 3-year statute of limitations prescribed by law.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006489
The applicant requests upgrade of his bad conduct discharge to a general discharge and change of his reentry eligibility (RE) code to one that will allow him to reenter military service. On 10 April 2009, he was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 3, as a result of a court-martial with a bad conduct discharge. Therefore, the applicant's record of service is insufficiently meritorious...