Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069817C070402
Original file (2002069817C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 18 June 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002069817

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Wanda L. Waller Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. Karol A. Kennedy Chairperson
Mr. Melvin H. Meyer Member
Mr. Allen L. Raub Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: Correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Good Conduct Medal and the Meritorious Unit Emblem (correctly known as the Meritorious Unit Commendation).

APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that in 1993 he received authorization for issuance of these awards; therefore, he would like his DD Form 214 corrected to show these awards. In support of his application, he submits a copy of his DD Form 214; a letter, dated 13 November 2001, from the Review Boards Agency, Support Division, St. Louis, Missouri; a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214), dated 13 November 2001; and DA Forms 1577 (Authorization for Issuance of Awards), dated 26 July 1993, 4 May 2001 and 16 October 1984.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

The applicant enlisted on 22 December 1969 for a period of 2 years. He served as a door gunner in Vietnam from 2 June 1970 through 10 February 1971 and was honorably discharged on 27 October 1971 by reason of physical disability.

The applicant’s DD Form 214, which was authenticated in his own hand, does not show the Good Conduct Medal or the Meritorious Unit Commendation as authorized awards.

In support of his claim, the applicant provided a DA Form 1577 (Authorization for Issuance of Awards), dated 26 July 1993, which shows that the Army Reserve Personnel Center in St. Louis, Missouri, determined that he was entitled to the Good Conduct Medal and the Meritorious Unit Commendation.

There are no orders for the Good Conduct Medal in the applicant’s service personnel records. His records show that he received three nonjudicial punishments during his enlistment. His records also show that he had 7 days of lost time due to being absent without leave.

There are no orders for the Meritorious Unit Commendation in the applicant’s service personnel records. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) lists the unit awards received by units serving in Vietnam. This document shows the unit, to which the applicant was assigned, the 191st Aviation Company, was not cited for award of the Meritorious Unit Commendation while he was assigned to it.

Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award
ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service. Although there is no automatic entitlement to the Good Conduct Medal, disqualification must be justified.

Army Regulation 600-8-22, in pertinent part, states that effective 1 March 1961 the Meritorious Unit Commendation was authorized for units and/or detachments of the Armed Forces of the United States for exceptionally meritorious conduct in the performance of outstanding services for at least six continuous months in support of military operations.

Army Regulation 600-8-104 (Military Personnel Information Management/Records) prescribes the policies governing the Official Military Personnel File, the Military Personnel Records Jacket, the Career Management Individual File, and Army Personnel Qualification Records. In pertinent part, this regulation states that for U.S. military decorations the only acceptable source documentation is the order, letter, or memorandum which awards the decoration. Award certificates, citations, or separation certificates alone will not be the basis for entry of a decoration. DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge) alone should not be the sole basis for recording a decoration. This document may be used to initially enter a decoration; however, if the validity of the award on the DD 214 is questioned or challenged, the only acceptable proof of award of the decorations will be the order, letter, or memorandum which awarded the decoration.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. The Board noted the DA Form 1577 (Authorization for Issuance of Awards), dated 26 July 1993, provided by the applicant which shows entitlement to the Good Conduct Medal and the Meritorious Unit Commendation. However, in accordance with Army Regulation 600-8-104, the DA Form 1577 is not an authority for entitlement to an award.

2. However, there are no orders awarding the applicant the Good Conduct Medal during his enlistment. Although there is no indication the applicant’s chain of command disqualified him from award of the Good Conduct Medal, his record shows instances of indiscipline, absence without leave and imposition of nonjudicial punishments which are disqualifying factors for award of the Good Conduct Medal. In view of the applicant’s acts of indiscipline, the Board determined that there was insufficient evidence on which to base award of the Good Conduct Medal in this case. Therefore, he is not entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award.

3. Also, there are no orders for the Meritorious Unit Commendation in the applicant’s military records. Evidence of record shows that the applicant’s unit did not receive the Meritorious Unit Commendation while he was assigned to it. Therefore, the Board determined that there is no evidence on which to base award of the Meritorious Unit Commendation in this case.

4. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

KAK____ MHM____ ALR_____ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2002069817
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20020618
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION (DENY)
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 107.0056
2. 107.0034
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025999

    Original file (20100025999.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He also requests the Vietnam Service Medal with three bronze service stars be shown on his DD Form 214. He provided a DA Form 1577, dated 27 May 1993, which shows he was issued the: * Good Conduct Medal * Meritorious Unit Emblem * National Defense Service Medal * Vietnam Service Medal with three bronze service stars * Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) * Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar This form also stated he was authorized the Republic of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057827C070420

    Original file (2001057827C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) to show award of the Army Commendation Medal, the Good Conduct Medal, the Presidential Unit Emblem (known as the Distinguished Unit Citation until 3 November 1966), the National Defense Service Medal, the Korean Service Medal, the Combat Infantryman Badge and the United Nations Service Medal. There is no evidence in the available records which shows the applicant was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007369

    Original file (20100007369.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The evidence of record does not show the applicant was recommended for or awarded the Army Commendation Medal. There is no evidence of record which shows the applicant was recommended for or awarded the Army Commendation Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075581C070403

    Original file (2002075581C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. On a DA Form 1577 dated 24 October 1984, the applicant was authorized issuance of the Army Good Conduct Medal, the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal with four bronze service stars, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Ribbon with device 1960, and the Meritorious Unit Emblem. It shows the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067879C070402

    Original file (2002067879C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    This document shows, in pertinent part, that the National Personnel Records Center determined that applicant was entitled to the Good Conduct Medal, the Presidential Unit Emblem (currently known as the Presidential Unit Citation), the Joint Meritorious Unit Emblem (currently known as the Joint Meritorious Unit Award) and the Expert Infantryman Badge which are not shown on the applicant’s DD Form 214. For Vietnam service, one overseas service bar is authorized for each period of 6 months...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003915

    Original file (20090003915.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to show he had combat service; that the date of entry on his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 24 October 1972 be corrected to show 4 August 1964; and that all of his awards be listed on his DD Form 214. The regulation, in effect at the time the applicant was on active duty, provided that a separate DD Form 214 was to be issued for each period of service. As a result, the DA Form 1577 is not...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017732

    Original file (20140017732.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * DD Form 214, ending on 5 January 1970 * ARPC Form 249-E (Chronological Statement of Retirement Points), dated 11 February 1997 * Permanent Orders (PO) 105-3 and certificate for award of the Purple Heart, dated 15 April 1997 * General Orders (GO) Number 13493 and certificate for award of the Army Commendation Medal, dated 26 December 1968 * DA Form 638 (Recommendation for Award) and certificate awarding him the Meritorious Service Medal, dated 6 April 1998 * Two DA...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006390

    Original file (20080006390.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s DD Form 214 shows the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), the Combat Infantryman Badge, the Air Medal, the Bronze Star Medal, the Army Commendation Medal, and the Purple Heart with First Oak Leaf Cluster as authorized awards. There are no orders for a third award of the Army Commendation Medal in the available records. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010899

    Original file (20100010899.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 21 October 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100010899 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Subsequent to his first period on active duty, his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) was amended to show participation in five campaigns and he was issued the Vietnam Service Medal with one silver service star. As the applicant's record shows he participated in five campaign phases during his tour in Vietnam, he is entitled to one silver service star for wear on...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006109

    Original file (20110006109.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, he is not entitled to have his record corrected to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting C Battery, 6th Battalion, 14th Field Artillery Regiment, USAREUR E7 from item 7 of his DD Form 214; b. adding Headquarters and Headquarters Battery, 6th Battalion, 14th Field Artillery Regiment, 1st Armored Division, USAREUR E7 to item 9 of his DD Form 214; c. awarding him the Army...