Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
Mr. Kenneth H. Aucock | Analyst |
Ms. Jennifer L. Prater | Chairperson | |
Mr. Arthur A. Omartian | Member | |
Ms. Regan K. Smith | Member |
2. The applicant requests award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM).
3. The applicant states that the award was approved after he was discharged from the Army. He was awarded the NATO Medal which shows the dates that he was deployed to the Bosnia-Herzegovina region.
4. The applicant’s military records show that he entered on active duty on 12 September 1990 and served on continuous active duty until his release from active duty in 1997, attaining the rank of sergeant. The applicant served in Germany from January 1991 until his release from active duty. He was awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 12 September 1990 to 11 September 1993.
5. An NCO Evaluation Report ending in September 1996 shows that the applicant was deployed to Bosnia-Herzegovina in support of Operation Joint Endeavor. The applicant was awarded the NATO Medal for service with NATO on operations in relation to the former Yugoslavia during the period 3 January 1996 to 19 September 1996 in Bosnia-Herzegovina.
6. The applicant was released from active duty on 24 January 1997. His DD Form 214 shows award of the Army Commendation Medal, the Army Achievement Medal, the Good Conduct Medal, the National Defense Service Medal, and the Expert Infantryman Badge, among others. The applicant completed the Primary Leadership Development Course in May 1995.
7. Army Personnel Command Message Number 99-100 (with a Date/Time Group of 121605Z March 1999) authorized award of both the Armed Forces Service Medal and the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal, as a one-time exception to Department of Defense and Service policy, for qualifying service in support of Operations Joint Endeavor and Joint Guard in the Republic of Bosnia-Herzegovina. This exception allowed both service medals to be presented to personnel deployed in Bosnia-Herzegovina, aboard naval vessels operating in the Adriatic Sea and their respective air spaces during the period 1 June 1992 to 19 December 1996 (Operation Joint Endeavor) and during the period 20 December 1996 to 20 June 1998 (Operation Joint Guard). The exception also allowed only one award of each service medal for service in either or both Operation Joint Endeavor and Operation Joint Guard.
8. The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Medal was authorized by the Secretary General of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization for specific NATO operations. The Secretary of Defense may approve acceptance and wear by United States service members who meet the criteria specified by the Secretary General of NATO. Acceptance of the NATO Medal has been approved for U.S. military personnel who serve under NATO command or operational control in direct support of NATO operations in the former Republic of Yugoslavia from 1 July 1992 through a date to be determined.
9. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service. Although there is no automatic entitlement to the Good Conduct Medal, disqualification must be justified.
10. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides for award of the NCO Professional Development Ribbon upon completion of the Primary Leadership Development Course.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant is entitled to award of the AFSM and the AFEM. Those awards should be listed on his DD Form 214. He was awarded the NATO Medal. That award should be shown on his DD Form 214.
2. The applicant served his country honorably and faithfully during his more than 6 years of service. He is entitled to a second award of the Army Good Conduct Medal – from 12 September 1993 to 11 September 1996.
3. The applicant is entitled to award of the NCO Professional Development Ribbon.
4. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned was awarded the Armed Forces Service Medal, the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal, the NATO Medal, the second award of the Army Good Conduct Medal, and the NCO Professional Development Ribbon.
BOARD VOTE:
__JLP __ __AAO __ __RKS __ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
____Jennifer L. Prater_____
CHAIRPERSON
CASE ID | AR2002069738 |
SUFFIX | |
RECON | YYYYMMDD |
DATE BOARDED | 20020604 |
TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
DISCHARGE REASON | |
BOARD DECISION | GRANT |
REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
ISSUES 1. | 107.00 |
2. | 118 |
3. | 46 |
4. | |
5. | |
6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006020
He provided a certificate showing he was awarded the NATO Medal for service with NATO on Operations relating to the Former Yugoslavia during the period August 1996 through February 1997. However, while the applicant's records and DFAS records do not conclusively show the exact dates he was deployed to Bosnia, the preponderance of evidence indicates he was in Bosnia/Croatia during the period of August 1996 to February 1997. The applicant provided a certificate showing he was awarded the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007484
There is no evidence of record which shows he received the NATO Medal for service with NATO on operations in relation to the former Republic of Yugoslavia. There is no evidence of record, and the applicant provided none, which shows he received the NATO Medal for service with NATO on operations in relation to the former Republic of Yugoslavia. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence on which to base adding the NATO Medal to his DD Form 214.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027018
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show, in effect, award of the Armed Forces Service Medal (AFSM) and the Army Achievement Medal (AAM). Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, for award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM) for qualifying service after 1 July 1958 in U.S. military operations, U.S....
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003412
The applicant requests that the Kosovo Campaign Medal (KCM) and the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM) be added to his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). Records available to the Board indicate the applicant was an MIARNG Soldier serving in pay grade E-5 at the time he was ordered to active duty on 31 December 1996 in support of Operation Joint Guard. The evidence available to the Board confirms the applicant deployed to Hungary for a period of 6...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001732
The applicant requests correction of his records to show all awards and decorations that he is entitled to receive as a result of his service in Bosnia from 7 January to 8 April 1996 in support of Operation Joint Endeavor. The evidence of record shows the applicant served in Bosnia from 7 January to 8 April 1996 in support of Operation Joint Endeavor which is a designated NATO operation or mission that was approved by the Secretary of Defense for acceptance and wear of the NATO Medal. The...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002636
The applicant provides a two-page letter explaining his application and copies of his DD Form 214, Military Personnel (MILPER) Message #99-157, MILPER Message #00-180, Certificate awarding him the NATO Medal, orders deploying his unit to Bosnia-Herzegovina in support of Task Force Eagle (Operation Joint Guard Follow on Force), a DA Form 4187 requesting award of the AFEM to the 401st Military Police Company, and the deployment orders for that unit. Acceptance of the NATO Medal has been...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012236
Item 5 (Oversea Service) on the applicant's DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) shows he served in Bosnia from 29 January 1996 through 20 August 1996 and from 30 March 1998 through 23 September 1998. In support of his claim, the applicant provided an award certificate which shows he was awarded the NATO Medal for service with NATO on operations in relation to the Former Republic of Yugoslavia during the period 13 January 1996 to 9 October 1996. As a result, the Board recommends...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018989
The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show the campaign medal for her service in Bosnia. The evidence of record shows the applicant served during a qualifying period of service for award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal, Armed Forces Service Medal, and she was issued a certificate for award of the NATO Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006407
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests the Good Conduct Medal, Army Achievement Medal (AAM), North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Medal, and certificates of appreciation and achievement be added to his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding the Army Good...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011601
The applicant requests his service in Operation Joint Endeavor/Guard, Army Achievement Medal, Armed Forces Service Medal, National Defense Service Medal, and North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Medal be annotated on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). There is no evidence he served on active duty during a period authorized for award of the National Defense Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that...