| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Deborah L. Brantley | Senior Analyst |
| Ms. Joann H. Langston | Chairperson | |
| Mr. John H. Slone | Member | |
| Mr. Terry L. Placek | Member |
2. The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart. He states he was "wounded in combat in Vietnam" but never received the Purple Heart. In support of his request he submits a copy of his separation physical examination.
3. Records available to the Board indicate the applicant served on active duty between 20 August 1963 and 14 July 1966. He attained the grade of E-4, consistently received excellent conduct and efficiency ratings, and was released from active duty with an honorable characterization of service.
4. While undergoing training the applicant was awarded the Expert Qualification Badge with Rifle, Automatic Rifle, and Machinegun bars. The applicant's records contain orders confirming the awards. The badge, with the component bars, was omitted from the applicant's 1966 DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge).
5. The applicant served in Vietnam between February and July 1966. He was assigned to the 1st Battalion of the 12th Cavalry Regiment and was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. He would have participated in two designed campaign periods during his tour of duty in Vietnam.
6. The applicant's separation physical examination, which was conducted on
14 July 1966, indicates the applicant was treated for malaria in Vietnam in April/May 1966, and that he had an unstable cyst like area on his left leg. The examination does not indicate the applicant was wounded as a result of hostile action while in Vietnam. Item 40 (wounds) on the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) is blank. Other than the applicant's separation physical examination, no other service medical records were available to the Board. The applicant's name is not listed on the Vietnam Casualty List.
7. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for wounds sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by a medical officer, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record. Injuries or illnesses which may have occurred, or been treated in a combat area, but were not the result of enemy action do not meet the qualification requirements for award of the Purple Heart.
8. Army Regulation 600-8-22 also provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service. Although there is no automatic entitlement to the Good Conduct Medal, disqualification must be justified. Current practice requires that the commander provide written notice of nonfavorable consideration and permits the individual to respond.
9. By virtue of the applicant's assignment to Vietnam he is entitled to two bronze service stars on his Vietnam Service Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross Unit Citation with Palm. Those awards were also omitted from his 1966 DD Form 214.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. Although the applicant's separation physical examination indicates the applicant may have received medical treatment while in Vietnam, there is no evidence which confirms he received treatment for any wounds sustained as a result of hostile action. As such there is no basis for an award of the Purple Heart.
2. The applicant did, however, complete a qualifying period of service for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal on 14 July 1966. There is no evidence in the applicant's official military personnel file that his commander ever disqualified him for award of the Good Conduct Medal and no evidence that would serve as a basis to deny him the award. The Board concludes that it would be appropriate, and in the interest of justice, to award the applicant the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 20 August 1963 through 14 July 1966.
3. The Board also concludes that the applicant is entitled to have the Expert Qualification Badge with Rifle, Automatic Rifle, and Machinegun Bar added to his 1966 DD Form 214, in addition to two bronze service stars on his Vietnam Service Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross Unit Citation with Palm. The Board notes that those decorations were omitted from his separation document.
4. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected:
a. by awarding the individual concerned the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 20 August 1963 through 14 July 1966;
b. by showing that he was awarded the Expert Qualification Badge with Rifle, Automatic Rifle, and Machinegun bars; and
c. by showing that he is entitled to two bronze service stars on his Vietnam Service Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross Unit Citation with Palm.
2. That so much of the application as is in excess of the foregoing be denied.
BOARD VOTE:
__JHL _ _ __JNS __ __TLP __ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
___Joann H. Langston____
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2002069644 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 20020509 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 107.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003562
Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. The instructions show for: (1) item 26 enter decorations awarded or authorized during the period covered by the DD Form 214, omitting authorities cited therein; (2) item 27 enter chronologically each wound received as the result of enemy action during the period covered by the DD Form 214...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013043
His DD Form 214 lists his awards as the National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960). It is appropriate to award the applicant the Army Good Conduct Medal for his period of service from 14 September 1966 through 7 September 1968. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal; b. awarding...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076689C070215
Paragraph 2-15b provides that requests for reconsideration, which are received more than 1 year after the Board’s original consideration or after the Board has already reconsidered the case will be considered only if the staff of the Board determines that substantial relevant new evidence shows fraud, mistake of law, mathematical miscalculation, manifest error, or that there is substantial relevant new evidence discovered contemporaneously with or within a short time after the Board’s...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029152
The applicant, the son of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of his father's DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show two awards of the Purple Heart. The DA Form 2-275-2 contained in the FSM's record shows he was awarded the Purple Heart by General Orders Number 189 for wounds received in action on 2 December 1967. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014927
Therefore, there is sufficient evidence to show that he is entitled to correction of his records to show award of the Purple Heart. The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and fidelity during the period 16 June 1966 to 13 June 1969;...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010479
His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) provides the following pertinent information: a. promotion to sergeant (E-5), effective 16 May 1969; b. assignment in Vietnam with Company B, 5th Battalion, 12th Infantry Regiment, as a rifleman, from 27 October 1968 through 22 May 1969; c. assignment to the Army Hospital, Camp Zama, Japan, as a patient from 23 May 1969 through 31 July 1969; d. assignment in Korea with Company B, 1st Battalion, 17th Infantry Regiment from 1 August 1969 through...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003621
In support of his request the applicant provides the following documents: a. a letter from the applicant to a VFW MSO, undated, in which he states he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze service stars, but he never received his other awards, including the: * Purple Heart (3 awards) * Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device (2 awards) * Presidential Unit Citation * Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Machinegun (M-60) Bar * Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018758
The DD Form 214 that he was issued at the time of his release from active duty shows that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Combat Infantryman Badge, the Vietnam Service Medal with bronze service star, and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960). Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to correct his military records to show the award of the Purple Heart. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040000402C070208
The applicant requests, in effect, that the already-awarded Purple Heart be added to his DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge. Department of the Army (DA) Pamphlet 672-3, Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register, dated 29 January 1988, which lists unit awards received by units serving in Vietnam, shows that the unit the applicant was assigned to, during his service in Vietnam, the 4th Aviation Battalion, 4th Infantry Division, was...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 03097858C070212
The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The evidence confirms that the applicant was wounded in action and awarded the Purple Heart. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing that he was awarded the Purple Heart; b. showing that he qualified as a marksman with the M-16 automatic rifle, and as a first class gunner (now referred to as a...