| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mrs. Nancy Amos | Analyst |
| Mr. Arthur A. Omartian | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Hubert O. Fry, Jr. | Member | |
| Mr. Thomas E. O'Shaughnessy, Jr. | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: Payment of two Medical Additional Special (MASP) contracts for $15,000 per year plus interest.
APPLICANT STATES: That he did not receive MASP entitlement totaling $30,000 from 6 July 2000 – 5 July 2001 and 6 July 2001 – 5 July 2002. The error was identified incidentally by the Army Medical Department (AMEDD) Special Pay Branch at the U. S. Total Army Personnel Command and brought to his attention. He provides five leave and earning statements to show he never received MASP.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records are not available.
In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the AMEDD Special Pay Branch. That office noted the applicant executed and was paid MASP at $15,000 per year effective 6 July 1999 – 5 July 2000 but that there was no record of any MASP contract submissions thereafter. Policy requires that officers must execute their contract no earlier than 90 days but no later than 30 days from the effective date. After that period, the date of signature becomes the new effective date. The applicant received all contractual pays authorized with the exception of one-year obligatory MASP contracts for the requested amounts and dates. His 1999 MASP was prepared at the Officers Basic Course at Fort Sam Houston, TX. The AMEDD Special Pay Branch opined that there appears to have been a system failure where the military personnel office and the officer failed to have contracts prepared for execution at the 2000 and 2001 MASP anniversary dates after his arrival in Germany. It was not until his communication with his assignment manager and the AMEDD Special Pay Branch that the problem was identified. That office noted that the applicant bears responsibility for his part of the contract execution and submission but supported payment of the outstanding MASP entitlements for the periods requested.
A copy of the advisory opinion was provided to the applicant for comment. He concurred with the advisory opinion on 29 March 2002.
Military Compensation Background Papers, fifth edition dated September 1996, states that the legislative authority for special pay for physicians (medical officers of the Armed Forces) is Title 37, U. S. Code, sections 301d, 302, 303a, and 303b. As background, it states that despite the piecemeal additions of pays and different categories of personnel to the health professionals special pay program,
there is, and has always been, a single unifying theme underlying the program – namely, the need to attract and retain a sufficient number of qualified health professionals to meet the health care demands of the armed forces.
Title 37, U. S. Code, section 302(a)(4) states that an officer entitled to variable special pay is entitled to additional special pay of $15,000 for any 12-month period during which the officer is not undergoing medical internship or initial residency training provided he or she first executes a written agreement under which he or she agrees to remain on active duty for a period of not less than one year beginning on the date the officer accepts the award of such pay.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
2. The AMEDD Special Pay Branch stated the applicant had executed a one-year contract and was paid MASP effective 6 July 1999 – 5 July 2000. He was aware that a contract needed to be signed before payment of MASP could be made. Failure of the military personnel office to prepare the required contracts did not relieve the applicant of the personal responsibility, when he should have been reasonably expected to know what was required, to request preparation of the contracts in a timely manner.
3. As noted in the Military Compensation Background Papers, fifth edition dated September 1996, background for special pay for medical officers of the Armed Forces, there is a single unifying theme underlying the special pay program – the need to attract and retain a sufficient number of qualified health professionals to meet the health care demands of the Armed Forces. The applicant did serve during those periods; therefore, notwithstanding the advisory opinion, the Board concludes that it would not be equitable to grant the relief requested at this late date.
4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
__aao___ __hof___ __teo___ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2002069533 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20020430 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | (GRANT) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 128.16 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068024C070402
In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the Army Medical Department (AMEDD) Special Pay Branch. That office noted that the applicant’s local military personnel office could not locate the commander-approved copies of the contracts he submitted that were attached to the DD Form 149 and there was no record of receipt by the Special Pay Branch. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing the applicant signed, on 28...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004105821C070208
The applicant states that he was denied ISP because his last tour of active duty was only 11 months. By message dated April 2001, authority to retain the applicant on active duty from 1 September 2003 until 31 August 2004 was granted for the purpose of accepting an assignment to Germany where there were critical shortages of urologists. On 11 April 2003, the applicant requested an extension of his MRD from 1 September 2004 to 1 December 2004 so he could complete his ISP and MASP contract.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002066602C070402
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010882
The opinion also states that the applicant received all contractual pays authorized with the exception of the one-year obligatory MASP agreement for $15,000/year effective 1 July 2005 to 30 June 2006. For Army Medical Corps Officers (Physicians), these special pays are: 1) Variable Special Pay (VSP) which is paid to all Medical Corps Officers monthly upon entry on active duty; 2) Board Certification Pay (BCP) which is paid monthly to all board certified Medical Corps Officers based upon...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011027
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 16 January 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130011027 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant provides his Officer Record Brief. There is no record of the requested MASP effective 1 July 2012. b.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008775
The applicant requests retroactive Medical Additional Special Pay (MASP) for the period 1 July 2012 through 30 June 2013. The applicant states he did not receive MASP for the period 1 July 2012 to 30 June 2013 due to the fact that he did not submit a signed contract. In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the U.S. Army Office of the Surgeon General, Chief, Army Medical Department (AMEDD) Special Pay Branch.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003634
The applicant requests his current Medical Additional Special Pay (MASP) contract effective 1 October 2013 be changed to 1 July 2013 based on his internship completion and assignment as a General Medical Officer (GMO). On 8 April 2014, an advisory opinion was obtained from the Chief, Army Medical Department (AMEDD) Special Pay Branch, Office of the Surgeon General who stated: a. there is no record of a created, executed, processed, or paid MASP effective 1 July 2013. b. upon internship...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070015251
The applicant provided the following additional documentary evidence in support of his application: a. DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), dated 24 February 2006; b. For Army Medical Corps officers (Physicians), these special pays are: 1) Variable Special Pay (VSP) which is paid to all Medical Corps officers monthly upon entry on active duty; 2) Board Certification Pay (BCP) which is paid monthly to all board certified Medical Corps officers based upon their...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120014988
The applicant provides copies of an Army Medical Department (AMEDD) Special Pay Form showing MASP of $15,000 for 2011; a Memorandum for the Chief, Special Pay Branch, Officer of The Surgeon General (OTSG), and a copy of his recertification certificate. That official notes that the applicant's pay record shows no indication that the applicant ever received MASP for the period in question and recommended payment based on time served and noted that the applicant was due approximately...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001052224C070420
There is no evidence in the records available to the Board that the applicant executed an annual contract for MASP for the period 1 July 1999 through 30 June 2000 or executed an annual contract for Incentive Special Pay (ISP) for the period 1 October 1999 through 30 September 2000. This message establishes, among many requirements, the specialties eligible for and rates for special pays, active duty obligations, contractual requirements, and the Department of the Army policies governing the...