| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Nancy L. Amos | Analyst |
| Mr. Fred N. Eichorn | Chairperson | ||
| Mr. Roger W. Able | Member | ||
| Mr. Harry B. Oberg | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: Reconsideration of her request for entitlement to Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) benefits.
APPLICANT STATES: That she was promised the pension of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM). She needs it to help her pay her weekly and monthly bills.
NEW EVIDENCE OR INFORMATION: Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in a memorandum prepared to reflect the Board's original consideration of her case on 23 October 2001.
Title 10, U. S. Code, section 12731(a) states that a person is entitled, upon application, to retired pay if the person is at least 60 years of age, has performed at least 20 years of qualifying service, and the last eight years of qualifying service have been performed while a member of a Reserve Component.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The FSM was eligible for retired pay at age 60, which he attained on 5 September 1998. However, the law requires that a member entitled to retired pay apply for retired pay. While it would be unusual, there is no evidence to show that it was not the FSM’s intent not to apply for his retired pay. It has happened that a member decided he did not need his retired pay and so made a deliberate decision not to apply for it.
2. There is no evidence of record to show the FSM had enrolled in the Reserve Component SBP (RCSBP) and, since he did not apply for retired pay, he would not have been eligible to enroll in the standard SBP. It does not appear that failure to grant the applicant relief would be inequitable. It was Congress’s intent in establishing the SBP to provide for those spouses who supported the military member for the majority of his or her military career. The applicant married the FSM seven years after he received his notification of eligibility for retired pay (his 20-year letter) and after he was discharged from the Army National Guard.
3. The overall merits of the case, including the latest submissions and arguments are insufficient as a basis for the Board to reverse its previous decision.
4. Regrettably, in view of the foregoing there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__FNE__ __RWA__ __HBO___ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2002069443 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 2002/06/11 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 137.02 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077913C070215
The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he applied for retired pay, elected to participate in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP), and changed his SBP coverage to former spouse coverage upon their divorce. Public Law 95-397, the Reserve Component SBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement but were not yet age 60, to provide an annuity for their...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088023C070403
The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he elected to participate in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) for spouse and children coverage, full base amount, option C and applied for retired pay. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. a. showing that the FSM applied for retired pay by completing a DD Form 2656 on 1 July 1998...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073290C070403
It would be compassionate to correct his records to show that he elected to participate in the RCSBP for spouse only coverage, option B (since it was his intent to have the SBP coverage effective upon his reaching age 60), full base amount. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing the FSM elected to participate in the RCSBP on 1 March 1997 for spouse only coverage, option B, full base amount by completing and returning the DD Form 1883 to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001056150C070420
The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he enrolled in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP). While the Board cannot change the date of the FSM’s death, the Board concludes that it would be appropriate to correct his records to show that he enrolled in the RCSBP on 1 July 1979 for spouse coverage, full base amount, option C. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070460C070402
The applicant requests that the records of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he applied for retired pay and enrolled in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) for spouse coverage. The applicant states the FSM was not briefed when he retired from the U. S. Army Reserve. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing the FSM applied for retired pay on 1 September 1999, naming the applicant as his beneficiary for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084080C070212
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement but were not yet age 60 to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063604C070421
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he changed his Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) coverage from spouse to former spouse. The FSM and the applicant divorced on 9 February 1999. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, and advisory opinion it is concluded:
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076772C070215
The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he elected to participate in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) for former spouse coverage. On 10 August 1992, he completed a Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate, DD Form 1883, and elected to participate in the RCSBP for spouse only coverage, full base amount, option C. He named the applicant as his spouse and indicated they were...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071049C070402
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement but were not yet age 60 to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching age 60. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074121C070403
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement but were not yet age 60 to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching age 60. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record,...