Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069373C070402
Original file (2002069373C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 3 October 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002069373

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Jessie B. Strickland Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. Irene N. Wheelwright Chairperson
Mr. Walter T. Morrison Member
Mr. Charles Gainor Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his report of separation (DD Form 214) be corrected to reflect in block 19a (Current Active Service Other Than by Induction – Source of Entry) an “X” in the “Enlisted – First Enlistment” block.

APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that his DD Form 214 incorrectly reflects an “X” in the “Reenlisted” box of item 19a and indicates that he was ordered to active duty for training (ACDUTRA). Consequently, because of this administrative error, he is being denied veterans benefits. He goes on to state that at the time of his enlistment, he was offered three options. He chose to go on active duty for 6 months and then serve 4 years in the National Guard. At the time they did not have room for him and he was told that they would let him know. A couple of months later he was told that there was room and was sent to Fort Dix, New Jersey and Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri for training. He goes on to state that he did his 6 months and 4 years of National Guard service and he believes he is entitled to veterans benefits. In support of his application he submits a photocopy of his DD Form 214.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

He enlisted in the New York Army National Guard (NYARNG) on 29 September 1959, for a period of 3 years. On 21 October 1959, Letter Order Number NY-1487 ordered the applicant to active duty for training for a period of 6 months, effective 31 October 1959. He was transferred to Fort Dix to undergo his basic combat training and then to Fort Leonard Wood to attend his advanced individual training (AIT). He successfully completed his AIT and was honorably released from ACDUTRA on 30 April 1960. He had served 6 months of active duty for training and was returned to his NYARNG unit. His DD Form 214 (original contained in his records) contains an “X” in the “other” box of block 19 and contains the remarks “Ordered to ACDUTRA.”

On 28 September 1962, he was honorably discharged from the NYARNG and was transferred to the United States Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Ready), where he remained until he was honorably discharged on 31 August 1965.

Army Regulation 635-5, in effect at the time, provided instructions for the preparation and issuance of the DD Form 214. It provides, in pertinent part, that an entry of an “X” in the “other” box with a following entry of “ordered to ACDUTRA” will be made in item 19a to show the source of entry for USAR and Army National Guard personnel who were ordered to ACDUTRA.




DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

2. The evidence of record clearly shows that he was in fact ordered to ACDUTRA and the appropriate block of “other” was “X’d” to indicate ACDUTRA. The “Reenlisted” block was not “X’d” and appears to be a carbon smudge of some type; however, the original copy contained in the records clearly shows it was not marked.

3. Accordingly, the applicant’s DD Form 214 was properly prepared in accordance with the applicable regulation in effect at the time.

4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__wtm___ ___inw__ ___cg___ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2001060578
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 2002/10/03
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 189 110.0000/corr 214
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001844

    Original file (20140001844.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states his tour of duty began with 2 months of additional training; however, following the completion of that training, the remainder of his time on active duty was spent training raw recruits. A DA Form 66 (Officer Qualification Record) indicates in item 18 (Record of Assignments) that he performed the following duties during his period of ACDUTRA: * 19 July 1959 - Casual en route to Fort Benning, GA * 20 July 1959 - Student Officer IOBC * 16 September 1959 - Casual en route...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004382C070206

    Original file (20050004382C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record also shows that the applicant was issued a DD Form 214 by the U.S. Army, with an effective date of 18 April 1959, which officially documents this ACDUTRA. Therefore, the applicant's state Army National Guard Records and the applicant’s Department of the Army records should be corrected to show he completed his six months of active duty for training from 19 October 1958 through 18 April 1959. As a result, the Board recommends that the state Army National Guard records...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078943C070215

    Original file (2002078943C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The applicant submitted a copy of his DD Form 214, his discharge orders from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) and his Honorable Discharge Certificate. The regulation directed that individuals who were ordered to active duty or called to active duty from Reserve Component, the entry "other" would be checked and the appropriate entry; "Ordered from ARNGUS or USAR", "Called from...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002081379C070215

    Original file (2002081379C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his active duty time should be changed from active duty for training (ACDUTRA) to Regular Army (RA) service. The evidence of record clearly shows that he was commissioned a second lieutenant in the USAR on 29 May 1960, and that he was ordered to ACDUTRA for 6 months from 4 January through 3 July 1961.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008004

    Original file (20120008004.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Special Orders Number 200, issued by the U.S. Army Personnel Center, Fort Dix, NJ, dated 19 July 1959, ordered his release from active duty at Fort Dix, NJ, on 23 July 1959, and returned him to the control of the USAR. The evidence of record clearly shows he was separated at Fort Dix, NJ; therefore, his DD Form 214 is correct and he is not entitled to the requested relief. _________X______________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001804

    Original file (20150001804.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military service records are not available to the Board for review. The applicant signed the document verifying the accuracy of the information recorded on the DD Form 214. c. Based on the above and the available evidence of record, it is concluded that the DD Form 214 correctly shows the applicant's active duty service during this period (emphasis added) and rank/grade at the time he was released from active duty. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067581C070402

    Original file (2002067581C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his report of separation (DD Form 214) be corrected to reflect that he served 3 months and 28 days of active duty separate from his active duty for training (ACDUTRA). At the time the applicant was commissioned in the USAR, he acknowledged that he would be voluntarily ordered to active duty for a period of 2 years or to ACDUTRA for a period of 6 months.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000837

    Original file (20100000837.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to reflect: * in block 13 that he was awarded the Army Service Ribbon (ASR), the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM), the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar, and the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Grenade Bar * in block 14 that he completed 8 weeks of basic combat training and 12 weeks of advanced individual training (AIT) in military...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006953

    Original file (20090006953.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of item 24 (Statement of Service) on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he was held over for 20 days because of the Cuban missile crisis. The DD Form 214 he was issued shows the following entries: a. item 24a(1) (Net Service This Period) shows he completed 6 months of creditable active service during this period; b. item 24a(2) (Other Service) shows he completed 20 days of prior service; c. item 24a(3) (Total...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000341

    Original file (20110000341.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides: * two DD Forms 214, for the period ending 22 November 1960 and 22 November 1966 * a DD Form 735 (Health Record - Abstract of Service) * a medical form entitled (Symptoms, Diagnosis, Treatment, Treating Organization) with entries dated 27 January 1959, 10 April 1959, and 8 August 1959 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. ___________X___________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is...