Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
Mr. Paul A. Petty | Analyst |
Mr. Mark D. Manning | Chairperson | |
Ms. Karen Y. Fletcher | Member | |
Mr. Lester Echols | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: Upgrade of his general discharge to an honorable discharge and access to the GI Bill education benefits.
APPLICANT STATES: He was a good soldier. He tried his best to fit in and found out that he wasn’t cut-out for the job. He really needs help to go to college.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
That he enlisted in the Army Reserve and the Delayed Entry Program on
12 August 1994, as a private, pay grade E-1. He enlisted in the Regular Army on
28 July 1995, as a private, pay grade E-2, for a 4-year term of service to become an armor crewman. He enlisted for the Educational Incentives Programs, Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) and Army College Fund (ACF). He signed a
DA Form 3286-66 (Statement of Understanding, United States Army Incentive Enlistment Program), indicating that he had read and understood in paragraph 5a(4), that if he failed to complete his term of enlistment and was discharged, he would lose entitlement to the MGIB and ACF, unless he had completed
30 months service of an enlistment if 3 years or more.
He completed basic and armor training at Fort Knox. He was promoted to private first class, pay grade E-3, on 14 August 1995. On 15 November 1995, he was assigned as a tank crewman to A Troop, 1/16th Cavalry, at Fort Knox.
On 18 July 1996, the applicant was involved in a one-car rollover incident at Fort Knox. He was found to be driving without car insurance and with a suspended driver’s license. On 6 August 1996, the applicant’s post driving privileges were revoked for 5 years.
On 21 October 1996, he was punished under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), by reduction to private E-2, 14 days extra duty, and suspended forfeiture of $229 for failure to go to his appointed place of duty, unit formation. On 5 November 1996, the suspended forfeiture was vacated and the forfeiture imposed due to the applicant driving on post on 23 October 1996, in violation of the order suspending his driving privileges.
On 6 November 1996, he was arrested by the Military Police for suspicion of larceny of $24 from a fellow soldier on 15-16 July 1996. The Staff Judge Advocate opined that there was sufficient evidence to title the applicant with the offense. The applicant was released to his commander pending a report of disciplinary action. There is no record of the disciplinary action. The record indicates that he told his commander that he was collecting a debt owed him by the fellow soldier.
On 26 November 1996, he was punished under Article 15, UCMJ, by suspended reduction to private E-1 and forfeiture of $204, and extra duty for 14 days. The specific reason for the Article 15 is not in the file but was related to violating suspended driving privileges.
On 22 December 1996, the commander was notified by the Army and Air Force Exchange System (AAFES) that the applicant was delinquent on payments to AAFES and that his Delayed Payment Plan and check cashing privileges were suspended. The applicant filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy.
On 15 January 1997, he was punished under Article 15, UCMJ, by reduction to private E-1, 14 days extra duty, and forfeiture of $204 for communicating a threat to a civilian, placing a false alarm call on 911, and under age drinking of an alcoholic beverage.
Between December 1995 and January 1997, he also received counseling statements for assault on a soldier’s wife, sleeping instead of being on duty, sleeping on duty, 13 times for failure to be at the appointed place of duty or at the appointed time, missing 22 items of uniform and equipment, loss of government property, poor appearance, poor performance of duty, failure to obey orders, failure to wear protective gear, and disobeying the direct order of a superior.
On 14 March 1997, the applicant was notified by his commander of his intent to separate the applicant for a pattern of misconduct under paragraph 14-12b, Army Regulation 635-200. On 18 March 1997, he was advised of his rights by a Judge Advocate officer. The applicant elected not to submit a statement on his own behalf. He did request legal counsel and representation. He was given a physical and mental evaluation. He was found to be mentally normal and responsible. On 19 March 1997, the commander recommended that the applicant be separated for a pattern of misconduct and that he receive a general, under honorable conditions, discharge. The recommendation was approved by the separation authority on 20 March 1997. The applicant was so discharged from the Army on 27 March 1997 as a private, pay grade E-1, with 1 year and
8 months (20 months) active service.
On 20 February 2002, the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) considered the applicant’s request for a discharge upgrade. After reviewing his military record, the ADRB denied the request finding that his general, under honorable conditions, discharge was proper and equitable under the circumstances.
Army Regulation 635-200 (Enlisted Personnel) sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 14 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct. Specific
categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, commission of a serious offense, convictions by civil authorities, desertion or absence without leave. Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impracticable or is unlikely to succeed.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. At enlistment, the applicant signed a DA Form 3286-66 (Statement of Understanding, United States Army Incentive Enlistment Program), indicating that he had read and understood in paragraph 5a(4), that if he failed to complete his term of enlistment and was discharged, he would lose entitlement to the MGIB and ACF, unless he had completed 30 months service of an enlistment if
3 years or more. He completed only 20 months of active service and is therefore not entitled to any MGIB benefits.
2. Based on his record of misconduct, the applicant was correctly and justly separated for a pattern of misconduct with a general, under honorable conditions, discharge. His separation processing was properly administered. He was provided counsel and advised of his rights. There is no basis for upgrading his discharge to honorable.
3. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__mm___ __kf___ ___le_____ DENY APPLICATION
CASE ID | AR2002069260 |
SUFFIX | |
RECON | |
DATE BOARDED | 20020523 |
TYPE OF DISCHARGE | GD |
DATE OF DISCHARGE | 19970327 |
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR 635-20, para 14-12b |
DISCHARGE REASON | Pattern of Misconduct |
BOARD DECISION | DENY |
REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
ISSUES 1. | 110 – Discharge Documents |
2. | |
3. | |
4. | |
5. | |
6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060002658C071029
Ronald D. Gant | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant provides her DA Form 3286-66 (Statement of Understanding United States Army Incentive Enlistment Program); her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty); and an email from the Department of Veterans Affairs. In a prior case, the Education Incentives Branch, USAHRC confirmed that the ACF is a fixed amount based on the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005895
The applicant's DA Form 3286-66 stated he was enlisting for the ACF for $30,000.00. The applicant's military records may be corrected to show his DA Form 3286-66 was amended to include the sentence, "If ACF benefits in the amount of $20,000.00 (exclusive of MGIB benefits) were authorized by the official processing you for enlistment and the Government fails to pay the full amount under the appropriate provisions and such failure results in nonpayment of ACF benefits in the amount of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060005839
x The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. It stated that applicants for enlistment would be advised of the following: The ACF provided additional educational assistance in addition to that earned under the MGIB. The evidence of record confirms the applicant enlisted in July 1997, and there is insufficient evidence to show he was not advised that the $30,000 listed as his ACF benefit was the total combined amount of the MGIB...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001793
The applicant requests that he be paid $25,000.00 in Army College Fund (ACF) benefits as outlined in his enlistment contract. The applicants military records may be corrected to show his DA Form 3286-66 was amended to include the sentence, "If ACF benefits in the amount of $25,000.00 (exclusive of MGIB benefits) were authorized by the official processing you for enlistment and the Government fails to pay the full amount under the appropriate provisions and such failure results in...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010901
The applicant requests that he be paid $40,000.00 in Army College Fund (ACF) benefits as outlined in his enlistment contract. The applicants military records may be corrected to show his DA Form 3286-66 was amended to include the sentence, "If ACF benefits in the amount of $40,000.00 (exclusive of MGIB benefits) were authorized by the official processing you for enlistment and the Government fails to pay the full amount under the appropriate provisions and such failure results in...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070000904
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 24 July 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070000904 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests, in effect, that he be paid the $30,000.00 Army College Fund (ACF) kicker. It stated that applicants for enlistment would be advised of the following: The ACF provided additional educational...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005382
The applicant's military records show she enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) on 10 April 1997 and she reenlisted on 1 December 2000 and 30 July 2004. The available evidence does not show she enlisted for the ACF incentive. Further, the applicant has provided no evidence that shows she was led to believe she was eligible for the incentive.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040005403C070208
The applicant's DA Form 3286-66, paragraph 1a states that he was enlisting, in addition to the U. S. Army Training Enlistment Program, for the "US Army College Fund $30,000." The applicant's DA Form 3286-66, paragraph 1a stated that he was enlisting, in addition to the U. S. Army Training Enlistment Program, for the "US Army College Fund $30,000." The DVA informed the applicant that he would receive $35,460.00 in MGIB benefits plus $24,165.40 for his ACF benefits.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008274
The applicant requests that he be paid $40,000 in Army College Fund (ACF) benefits as outlined in his enlistment contract. The applicants military records may be corrected to show his DA Form 3286-66 was amended to include the sentence, "If ACF benefits in the amount of $40,000.00 (exclusive of MGIB benefits) were authorized by the official processing you for enlistment and the Government fails to pay the full amount under the appropriate provisions and such failure results in nonpayment...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008599
The applicant requests that he be paid $40,000 in Army College Fund (ACF) benefits as outlined in his enlistment contract. The applicants military records may be corrected to show his DA Form 3286-66 was amended to include the sentence, "If ACF benefits in the amount of $40,000.00 (exclusive of MGIB benefits) were authorized by the official processing you for enlistment and the Government fails to pay the full amount under the appropriate provisions and such failure results in nonpayment...