| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. William Blakely | Analyst |
| Ms. Jennifer L. Prater | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Arthur A. Omartian | Member | |
| Ms. Regan K. Smith | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his retired rank and pay grade be upgraded and that he be provided all back pay and allowances due as a result.
APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that he was not promoted prior to his retirement because of the chain of command’s attitude towards promotions. In support of his application, he submits the following documents: a copy of his separation document (DD Form 214); his retirement application (DA Form 2339); a letter in regard to his creditable service from a Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) official, dated 4 December 1968; a statement of service (DD Form 13); and his retirement orders.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
On 29 February 1968, the applicant was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD), in the rank and pay grade of specialist six/E-6 (SP6/E-6), for the purpose of retirement. At the time of his separation, he had completed a total of 20 years, 1 month, and 4 days of active military service.
The applicant’s Personnel Qualification Record (DA Form 2-1) confirms in Item 18 (appointments and reductions) that he was promoted to the rank and pay grade of SP6/E-6 on 1 September 1963, and that this is the highest rank and pay grade he attained while serving on active duty. In addition, there are no orders or other documents contained in his Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) that give any indication that he was ever promoted to, held, or served in a higher pay grade while he was serving on active duty.
A Data For Retired Pay (AGPZ Form 977), dated 4 January 1968, prepared on the applicant during his retirement processing contains the entry SP6/E-6 in Item 2 (Retired Grade), Item 6 (Highest Grade Held), and Item 17 (Retired Pay Grade), which verifies that this was the rank and pay grade he held on the date of his REFRAD, and that it was the highest rank and pay grade he was promoted to and held while serving on active duty. This document further confirms that he was placed on the Retired List in the rank and pay grade of SP6/E-6 on 1 March 1968.
The separation document (DD Form 214) issued to and authenticated by the applicant with his signature on the date of his REFRAD, 29 February 1968, confirms that he held the rank of SP6/E-6 on the date of his separation and was serving in military occupational specialty (MOS) 71C (Stenographer). This document also confirms that during his active duty tenure he earned the following awards: Army Good Conduct Medal (6th Award); National Defense Service Medal; Korean Service Medal with 4 bronze service stars; Combat Infantryman Badge; United Nations Service Medal; World War II Victory Medal; and the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (Dominican Republic).
Title 10, United States Code, Section 3961 provides the general rule for assigning a retired grade. It states, in pertinent part, that unless entitled to a higher retired grade under some other provision of law, a Regular or Reserve member of the Army who retires other than for physical disability retires in the regular or reserve grade that he/she holds on the date of his retirement.
Title 10, United States Code, Section 3964, provides that a retired enlisted member or warrant officer of the Army who is retired with less than 30 years of active service is entitled, when his active service plus his service on the Retired List totals 30 years, to be advanced on the Retired List to the highest grade in which he served on active duty satisfactorily. The term “highest grade in which he served on active duty satisfactorily” does not apply to a member who simply served in a position calling for a higher rank and pay grade. In order to meet the satisfactory service provisions of the law a member must have actually been promoted to, paid as, and served in the higher grade while on active duty.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The Board notes the applicant’s contention that his chain of command’s attitude towards promotions hindered his promotion to a higher rank and as a result, his retired grade should be upgraded and he should be provided all back pay and allowances due as a result. However, the Board finds insufficient evidence to support this claim.
2. By law, members are retired in the grade they hold on the date of their REFRAD, and in order to be advanced on the Retired List it must be determined that a member satisfactorily served on active duty in a higher grade. To receive a satisfactory service determination under this statutory provision, a member must have been promoted to, paid as, and satisfactorily served in a higher pay grade while on active duty.
3. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant was placed on the Retired List in the rank and pay grade of SP6/E-6 and that this is the rank and pay grade he held on the date of his REFRAD and was the highest rank he attained and in which he satisfactorily served while on active duty. Lacking independent evidence to the contrary, the Board finds the applicant was placed on the retired list in accordance with applicable law and regulation, and it concludes there is insufficient evidence to support grating the relief requested by the applicant.
4. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
JLP AAO RKS DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2002069025 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 2002/05/30 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 129.0400 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078537C070215
These orders also authorized the applicant the retired rank and pay grade of SP6/E-6. It states, in effect, that upon a determination by the Secretary concerned a member who is determined to be unfit to perform the duties of their office, grade, rank, or rating because of a temporary physical disability incurred while on active duty may be placed on the TDRL and receive retired pay. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant was promoted to SFC/E-7 on 11 September 1968, during a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059788C070421
By law and regulation, retirement will be in the Regular or Reserve grade the soldier holds on the date of retirement and advancement on the Retired List is only authorized when a member has held and satisfactorily served on active duty in a higher grade. In fact, the applicant’s own evidence, the LTG letter, confirms that the promotion recommendation submitted on him in 1968 was returned without action by the promotion authority. The Board also took special note of the fact that the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001056806C070420
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091703C070212
On 8 January 1990, the applicant submitted an application for voluntary retirement (DA Form 2339) requesting a retirement date of 31 October 1990, in the rank and pay grade of SFC/E-7. It states, in pertinent part, that retired soldiers are entitled to be advanced on the Retired List to the highest grade they held and in which they satisfactorily served on active duty when their active service plus service on the retired list totals 30 years. By law, enlisted soldiers are retired in the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065230C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. In addition, there are no orders or other documents contained in his Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) that give any indication that he was ever promoted to, held, or served in a higher pay grade while he was serving on active duty. The applicant submitted an application to the Army Grade Determination Board (AGRDB) requesting advancement on the Retired List to the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002066460C070402
It further confirms that he held the rank and pay grade of SFC/E-7 on the date of his separation and that on the following day he was placed on the Retired List in that rank and pay grade. By law and regulation, enlisted soldiers are retired in the rank and pay grade they hold on the date of their REFRAD, and retired soldiers are entitled to be advanced on the Retired List to the highest grade in which they satisfactorily served while on active duty, as determined by the Secretary of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077004C070215
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded: The evidence of record confirms that the applicant was placed on the Retired List in the rank and pay grade of LTC/0-5, and that this is the highest rank he attained and in which he...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060002888C070205
The applicant’s Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) is void of any orders or documents that indicate the applicant was ever selected for promotion to the pay grade E-8 by a properly constituted promotion selection board, or that he was promoted to a pay grade above E-7 by proper authority while serving on active duty. Further, by law, Soldiers are retired in the rank and pay grade they hold on the date of their REFRAD. It also shows he was never selected for promotion to the pay grade...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068213C070402
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070788C070402
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The term “highest grade in which he served on active duty satisfactorily” does not apply to a member who simply served in a position calling for a higher rank and pay grade. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant was placed on the Retired List in the rank and pay grade of SFC/E-7, and that this is the highest rank and pay grade he attained, and in which he...