| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Nancy L. Amos | Analyst |
| Mr. Fred N. Eichorn | Chairperson | ||
| Ms. Barbara J. Ellis | Member | ||
| Mr. William D. Barr | Member |
2. The applicant, attorney for the two minor children of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests, in effect, that the records of their deceased father be corrected to show he declined to resume spouse Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage upon his remarriage.
3. The applicant states that, according to the terms and intent of the Stipulation Agreement entered into as part of divorce proceedings, the widow of the FSM waived any interest in the SBP. The FSM died prior to the divorce being finalized and the annuity is being paid to the widow whereas it should be paid to his surviving children. As supporting evidence, he provides a signed statement from the widow concurring in this correction to provide for payment of future benefits to the FSM’s surviving children rather than to her. Also provided is a signed statement from the FSM's surviving children and their legal guardian renouncing retroactive SBP benefits that were paid to the widow and understanding that the widow would not be liable for repayment of such benefits paid to her prior to the effective date of this record correction action.
4. The FSM’s military records show that, after having had prior service, he reenlisted in the Regular Army in June 1956. He was permanently retired by reason of a physical disability on 3 November 1970.
5. Records at the Defense Finance and Accounting Service show that the FSM enrolled in the SBP in 1973 for spouse and children coverage.
6. In 1994, the FSM divorced, leaving two dependent children. He remarried on 8 May 1998.
7. On 17 November 1999, the FSM and his spouse entered into a Stipulation Agreement. In pertinent part, the Agreement stated that his spouse forever relinquished and released all right, title, and interest which she then or ever may have in and to the real, personal and mixed property of the FSM. She also agreed to waive any right she may have had, then or in the future, to spousal support and maintenance.
8. The FSM died on 13 July 2000, prior to the divorce becoming final. The FSM’s widow, as the legal beneficiary, was paid the SBP annuity.
9. Public Law 92-425, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that military members on active duty could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents. Changes in SBP options are not authorized except in specific instances or authorized by law. Coverage is suspended when there is no eligible beneficiary. An Open Season was declared for members who retired prior to enactment of the SBP.
10. Public Law 99-145, enacted 8 November 1985, permitted a previously participating retiree upon remarriage to elect not to resume spouse coverage or to increase reduced coverage for the latter spouse. Changes must be made prior to the first anniversary of remarriage or else the previously suspended coverage resumes by default on the first day of the month following the first anniversary of the remarriage, with costs owed from that date. An election to terminate spouse coverage under this law, once made, is irrevocable.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The Board believes that it was the intent of the FSM not to provide SBP coverage for his spouse once their divorce became final. Once he no longer had an eligible spouse beneficiary, his children would have become the legal beneficiaries. Unfortunately, he died prior to the divorce becoming final. Since he was still legally married at the time he died, his widow was also the legal SBP beneficiary.
2. The widow stated that she waived any interest in the SBP in the Stipulation Agreement entered into as part of their divorce proceedings and now has relinquished her right to any future SBP payments in the statement provided with her application. The FSM's children and their guardian have renounced retroactive SBP benefits that were paid to the widow and understand that the widow would not be liable for repayment of such benefits paid to her prior to the effective date of this record correction action.
3. In order to provide the SBP annuity to the FSM’s dependent children, it would be appropriate to now correct his records to show that he elected not to resume spouse coverage when he married the widow. This would make his minor children the legal beneficiaries of his SBP. However, in accordance with the request of the widow (the legal beneficiary of the SBP annuity prior to this records correction taking effect) and with the concurrence of the FSM's children and guardian, only future payments of the SBP will be provided to the FSM’s children. Any SBP annuity paid to the widow will not be recouped.
4. In view of the foregoing, the FSM’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that, on 1 June 1998, the FSM elected to terminate spouse coverage.
2. That the date of this Board action will be the effective date to pay the SBP annuity to the FSM’s children. Any SBP annuity paid to the widow will not be recouped.
3. That so much of the application as is in excess of the foregoing be denied.
BOARD VOTE:
__FNE __ __ BJE _ __WDB __ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
__Fred N. Eichorn _
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2002068856 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 2002/09/10 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | PARTIAL GRANT |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 137.04 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001066200C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Public Law 98-94, dated 24 September 1983, established former spouse coverage for retired members (Reservists, too). It also permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070015370
The FSM and the applicant divorced on 8 May 1987. The FSM died on 23 October 2002, and his eligible minor daughter was paid the SBP annuity. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing that the FSM made a written request on 9 May 1987 to change his SBP election to former spouse and children coverage; that his request was received and processed by the appropriate office in a timely manner; and that the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070000870
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 10 July 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070000870 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1450(f)(3)(A) permits a former spouse to make a written request that an SBP election of former spouse coverage be deemed to have been made when the former spouse is awarded the SBP annuity...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060016424C071029
The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) election to former spouse coverage. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. Since the FSM died with spouse...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019417
The applicant, the former spouse of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests in effect correction of her former husband's record to show he elected Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage for former spouse, and payment of the SBP annuity based on his death. On 25 March 1987, the FSM and applicant were divorced. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member's agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024481
The applicant requests reconsideration of her earlier request for correction of her deceased former husband's records, a former service member (FSM), to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage from spouse to former spouse. The applicant states: a. she now provides a notarized statement from the FSM's widow renouncing her right to an SBP annuity as indicated in the "Discussion and Conclusions" section of the original Record of Proceedings; and b. contrary to the Army Board...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017623
In a letter dated 14 August 2012, DFAS denied her request and informed her that in order for a former spouse to be eligible for the SBP, the former spouse had to be awarded the SBP in the divorce decree and the applicant or her attorney would have to deem her election for former spouse SBP coverage within 1 year of the date of the divorce. Records on file at DFAS reflected the retiree's SBP election was for spouse coverage and they did not receive a deemed election from her within 1 year of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012159
The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her former spouse, a deceased former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage to former spouse coverage. The divorce decree incorporated a Property Settlement Agreement which states, in pertinent part, that "The Husband agrees to pay the premiums and to maintain in full force and effect insurance on his life payable to the Wife as beneficiary and to David J. The Army Board for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065106C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. His spouse’s consent to his requested change was required before the SBP Board would consider granting his request.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020192
The FSM's records at DFAS show the FSM married P____. The evidence of record shows the FSM elected to participate in the SBP for spouse and children coverage at the time of his retirement in 1979. However, the FSM did not make a former spouse election within 1 year of the divorce as required by law and the applicant did not request a deemed election, also required to be made within 1 year of her divorce from the FSM.