Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068814C070402
Original file (2002068814C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 25 July 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002068814

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Nancy L. Amos Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Raymond V. O’Connor, Jr. Chairperson
Mr. Richard T. Dunbar Member
Mr. Kenneth W. Lapin Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: That the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he changed his Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) coverage to former spouse coverage.

APPLICANT STATES: That the FSM thought he had made a permanent and irrevocable election and that the RCSBP annuity would go to her without it needing to be changed to former spouse coverage. They discussed this during the divorce proceedings. He wanted her to have it since she was there to help and support him during the 20 years he was in the Army National Guard. Although they went through unfortunate times and divorce, they cared for each other and their child very much. She provides a sworn affidavit from the FSM’s brother, an attorney licensed to practice law in North Carolina. He swears that the FSM contacted him in October 1991 with respect to advice and counsel in making his will. The RCSBP annuity was specifically discussed. Disposition of this annuity was not made part of his will because he believed that, under the clear and unambiguous language of the Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate, DD Form 1883, the benefits of the RCSBP annuity would pass outside the will, like his insurance benefits, to his previously designated beneficiary: his ex-wife, the applicant. At the time of the dissolution of their marriage, no property settlement was executed because the FSM wanted the applicant (the mother of his only child) to receive everything they owned at the time and he simply relinquished title to their property to her without court order.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The FSM's military records show:

He enlisted in the Army National Guard on 18 July 1960. He and the applicant married on 10 August 1963. He was discharged from the Army National Guard on 4 October 1980. His notification of eligibility for retired pay at age 60 (his 20-year letter) is dated 13 February 1981. On 26 February 1981, he completed a DD Form 1883. He elected spouse only RCSBP coverage, full base amount, option C.

The FSM and the applicant divorced on 10 July 1984. The divorce decree is not available but apparently the RCSBP was not mentioned. The FSM remarried on 20 September 1985. He died on 21 December 1998.

The FSM’s widow submitted an application dated 14 April 2002 (AR2002074719) to the Board requesting she be granted the RCSBP annuity.

Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement but were not yet age 60 to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching age 60. Three options are available: (A) elect to decline enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to start SBP participation; (B) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity if they die before age 60 but delay payment of it until the date of the member’s 60th birthday; (C) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity immediately upon their death if before age 60. Elections are made by category, not by name. Changes in SBP options are not authorized except in specific instances or authorized by law.

Public Law 97-252, the Uniformed Services Former Spouses Protection Act (USFSPA), dated 8 September 1982 established SBP for former military spouses for retiring members. Public Law 98-94, dated 24 September 1983, established former spouse coverage for retired members (Reservists, too).

Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. The Board agrees with the FSM’s brother’s contention that the language of the DD Form 1883 was clear and unambiguous. The FSM elected spouse only coverage. The applicant was the FSM’s spouse at that time. However, once they divorced, she was no longer his spouse and so not entitled to be a spouse only beneficiary. His brother is correct in presuming that the benefits of the RCSBP annuity would pass outside the will. Even if the will had “granted” the RCSBP to the applicant, she could not have received it because, again, she was not his spouse.

2. While it was Congress’s intent in establishing the SBP to provide for those spouses who supported the military member for the majority of his or her military career, the lawful beneficiary of the FSM’s RCSBP is eligible to receive the annuity. Absent a statement from the FSM’s widow asserting that she agrees to renounce payment of the SBP annuity in perpetuity in favor of the applicant, (and she has indicated to the Board that she does not desire to renounce the annuity), the Board will not take any action to prevent the lawful beneficiary from receiving those benefits. To do so would constitute an unconstitutional taking without due process of law.

3. Regrettably, in view of the foregoing there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__RVO__ __RTD__ __KWL__ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2002068814
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 2002/07/25
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 137.04
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.



Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100030282

    Original file (20100030282.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of the records of her deceased husband, a retired former service member (FSM), to show: a. he made a voluntary election for former spouse immediate coverage under the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) on the full base amount of his retired pay within 1 year of their divorce; and b. she filed a claim for the SBP annuity in a timely manner following the FSM's death. The applicant states she was denied her former spouse's retirement...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004100155C070208

    Original file (2004100155C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides the death certificate; a notification from the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS); a court reporter brief; written transcripts of the trial with a copy of tapes of the trial; the divorce decree; paperwork filed for a portion of retired pay and SBP annuity; Office of Personnel Management's 25 August 1986 acknowledgement for the paperwork sent for the court-ordered former spouse annuity; the request for deemed election; a 3 February 1997 acknowledgement of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076772C070215

    Original file (2002076772C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he elected to participate in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) for former spouse coverage. On 10 August 1992, he completed a Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate, DD Form 1883, and elected to participate in the RCSBP for spouse only coverage, full base amount, option C. He named the applicant as his spouse and indicated they were...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012822

    Original file (20060012822.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The FSM divorced M___ E___ in 1982. MEMBER NEVER CANCELED HIS SBP ELECTION AFTER HIS DIVORCE. The evidence of record shows he was not married to the applicant at the time of his death.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023390

    Original file (20110023390.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * Orders 343-072 (Retired Reserve) * National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 23B (Army National Guard (ARNG) Retirement Points History Statement) * Letters from her divorce attorney * Superior Court of the State of New York, County of Orange, Court Order – Acceptance for Processing and Amended Court Order – Acceptable for Processing * Correspondence with and from DFAS * DD Form 2656-10 (SBP/RCSBP Request for Deemed Election) * Copies of certified mail receipts * Letter from...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005696

    Original file (20110005696.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant and FSM divorced in 1997. Public Law 92-425, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that military members on active duty could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents. Title 10, U.S. Code, chapter 73, provides that a spouse loses status as an SBP beneficiary upon divorce; however, the means by which the divorced (former) spouse may receive a survivorship annuity are: a. if the service member voluntarily...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060016263C071029

    Original file (20060016263C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides their divorce decree; the FSM’s DD Form 1883 (Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate); the FSM’s DD Form 2656, and the FSM’s obituary. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. Notwithstanding his widow informing the Board analyst that she was actively...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000928

    Original file (20110000928.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), to show he timely changed his Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) coverage from "spouse" to "former spouse" coverage at the time of their divorce and payment of the SBP annuity based on his death. The evidence of record shows that the FSM executed a DD Form 1883 on 19 August 1979, electing "spouse and children" RCSBP coverage under option C, immediate...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003096

    Original file (20090003096.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence in the FSM's file, and provided by the applicant indicates the FSM was divorced at the time he completed his SBP election form in 1997. In order to provide immediate coverage to the applicant or his nephew the FSM would have had to so indicate on his election form. Unfortunately, the evidence does not support a conclusion that the FSM intended to provide an immediate annuity to an insurable interest under the SBP when he made his SBP election in November 1998.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001066198C070421

    Original file (2001066198C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Retirement Services Noncommissioned Officer for the Tennessee Army National Guard states that she believes the FSM was not properly counseled as to how inexpensive coverage for his daughter would have been and on how to change his Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate, DD Form 1883, upon a change of dependency (such as divorce). Although as of 19 March 2002 records at DFAS still indicate that the FSM’s former spouse was his SBP beneficiary, they did not have any divorce documents...