Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068758C070402
Original file (2002068758C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 2 July 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002068758

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Jessie B. Strickland Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. Karol A. Kennedy Chairperson
Mr. Arthur A. Omartian Member
Mr. Raymond J. Wagner Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his Reentry (RE) Code be changed to a more favorable code that will allow him to enlist again.

APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that he had an allergic reaction to medication at the time and was discharged for a condition (flat feet) that existed prior to entry into service (EPTS). However, he has been examined by officials at the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) who opine that he could fulfill his military obligations. In support of his application, he submits a letter from the DVA, a copy of his report of separation (DD Form 214), a copy of his Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) Proceedings (DA Form 3947), a copy of his Physical Profile (DA Form 3349), and copies of some medical documents.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

He enlisted on 30 April 1999 for a period of 4 years, training as an infantryman and a cash enlistment bonus. He served until 20 August 1999, when he was discharged at Fort Benning, Georgia, for failure to meet procurement medical fitness standards under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-11. He had served 3 months and 21 days of total active service and his service was uncharacterized. He was issued a RE Code of “3”.

The applicant again enlisted on 22 August 2001, for a period of 4 years, training as an infantryman and a cash enlistment bonus. He was transferred to Fort Benning and on 21 September 2001 and was issued a permanent physical profile for Pes Planus – chronic flat feet with pain.

On 10 October 2001, the applicant was evaluated by a MEB which determined that he had flat feet and that the condition EPTS. The MEB recommended that the applicant be discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 5 and the Expeditious Discharge Program. The applicant indicated that he did not desire to continue on active duty and that he concurred with the findings of the MEB. The findings and recommendations were approved on 12 October 2001.

Accordingly, he was discharged on 30 October 2001, with his service uncharacterized, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 5, due to a disability that EPTS – Medical Board. He had served 2 months and 9 days of active service and was given a RE Code of “3”.

The letter from the DVA is dated 26 October 2001, 4 days prior to his discharge. The examining physician opined that the applicant suffered from mild flat feet bilaterally and that if he is asymptomatic, he should not have any problems fulfilling his military obligations.

Army Regulation 635-200 serves as the authority for enlisted separations and discharges. Chapter 5 of that regulation provides for the separation of personnel who did not meet procurement medical fitness standards. It states, in pertinent part, that soldiers who were not medically qualified under procurement medical fitness standards when accepted for enlistment, or who became medically disqualified under these standards prior to entry on active duty, will be separated. Medical proceedings, regardless of the date completed, must establish that a medical condition was identified by appropriate medical authority within 6 months of the soldier’s entry on active duty. Personnel in an entry-level status will not have their service characterized.

Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. Army Regulation 601-210 covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment processing into the Regular Army and the USAR. Chapter 3 of that regulation prescribes basic eligibility for prior service applicants for enlistment. That chapter includes a list of armed forces RE codes.

RE-3 applies to persons not qualified for continued Army service, but the disqualification is waivable. Certain persons who have received nonjudicial punishment are so disqualified, as are persons with bars to reenlistment, and those discharged under the provisions of chapters 5, 9, 10, 13, 14, and 16 of Army Regulation 635-200. A waiting period of 2 years from separation is required before a waiver may be submitted.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

2. The applicant’s administrative separation was accomplished in accordance with applicable regulations with no indication of any violations of the applicant’s rights.

3. The applicant was separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 5; therefore; he was properly issued an RE Code of “3” in accordance with the applicable regulations.

4. The applicant has failed to show through the evidence submitted or the evidence of record that he was issued the wrong RE Code at the time of his separation.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__kak ___ ___ao___ __rjw ___ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2002068758
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 2002/07/02
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 4 100.0300/RE CODE
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021051

    Original file (20110021051.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests the reason and authority for his release from active duty be corrected. The SPD KFN, as corrected by the DD Form 215, specified the narrative reason for discharge as "Physical disability prior to entry on active duty - Medical Board" and the authority for discharge under this SPD was Army Regulation 635-40, chapter 5. Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation), chapter 5, then it effect, stated an enlisted Soldier may be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057698C070420

    Original file (2001057698C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. On 22 November 2000, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009736

    Original file (20110009736.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    b. her initial "Report of Medical Examination" completed on 23 April 1997 shows she did not have any problems with her lower extremities and her feet were determined to have a normal arch. She was sent to the Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) for shin splints and flat feet. There is insufficient evidence to show the applicant's PEB findings were incorrect, that the applicant's shin splints did not exist prior to her service in the Army, that her leg condition was permanently aggravated by her...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016808

    Original file (20140016808.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation (AR) 635-200 (Enlisted Personnel), chapter 5 be changed to a medical discharge. Chapter 5 provides that Soldiers who are not medically qualified under procurement medical fitness standards when accepted for enlistment, or who became medically disqualified under these standards prior to entry on active duty, active duty for training, or initial entry training will be separated. A medical proceeding...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019568

    Original file (20140019568.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show she was medically discharged because of a medical disability under honorable conditions. Her record contains a DA Form 4707 (Entrance Physical Standards Board), dated 13 March 1986, which shows the board found her medically unfit for enlistment for her medical conditions, which in the opinion of medical personnel were conditions that existed prior to service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012093

    Original file (20100012093.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he was discharged in 2001 for having flat feet. He has arches in his feet but he is otherwise in an excellent physical condition. Army Regulation 635-200 states that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9711074

    Original file (9711074.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 1 December 1993, the applicant requested discharge for physical disability based upon the findings and recommendations of a medical evaluation board. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Medical proceedings, regardless of the date completed, must establish that a medical condition was identified by appropriate military medical authority within 6 months of the soldier’s initial entrance of active duty that would have permanently...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002681

    Original file (20110002681.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 10 May 1996, he requested discharge for physical disability. His service medical records are not available. The applicant requests that his RE code 4 be changed to 1 or 2 so he may be allowed to enlist in the Army.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015643

    Original file (20080015643.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the entry of "Uncharacterized" in item 24 (Character of Service) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be changed to read "Honorable." This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. The applicant's military...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013251

    Original file (20080013251.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, a medical discharge and correction to his discharge date. If a Soldier is found unfit because of physical disability, this regulation provides for disposition of the Soldier according to applicable laws and regulations. The evidence shows the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 1 March 1988 and was discharged on 12 April 1988.